Crustal evolution and tectonomagmatic history of the Indian Shield at the periphery of supercontinents

Wei Wang,Christopher Spencer,Manoj K. Pandit,Yuan-Bao Wu,Jun-Hong Zhao,Jian-Ping Zheng,Xiao-Ping Xia,Gui-Mei Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.10.040
IF: 5
2022-11-05
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Abstract:River sand detrital zircons from several rivers flowing through the Peninsular Indian cratons were analyzed for U-Pb, Lu-Hf, and O isotopes to characterize the Precambrian crustal evolution of the Indian Shield and to constrain its role in the early supercontinent cycles. Analyzed river sand zircon samples exhibit a prominent age grouping at 2.7-2.4 Ga and additional peaks at 1.8-1.7 Ga, 1.0-0.8 Ga, and 0.6-0.5 Ga. The time-related Hf and O isotope trends of the Indian zircons display a slight offset from the global trends. The age peaks and distinct Hf-O isotopic compositions of the Indian zircons also lack coherence with the global patterns associated with supercontinent cycles, implying a discrete crustal evolutionary history for the Indian Shield. Their contrasting ε Hf -age trajectories indicate that the Indian Shield was accreted to the Columbia/Nuna supercontinental framework through a collision event that postdated the 2.1-1.8 Ga global-scale orogeny, and was part of a long-lived subduction system along the margin of Rodinia. This implies that the Indian Shield occupied a peripheral paleo-position during the assembly of the two Precambrian supercontinents. The ca. 2.6-2.4 Ga Indian river sand zircons have remarkably low δ 18 O values that are distinct from the global zircon O isotopic record. This period coincides with the fragmentation of the Archean supercraton and the flaring-up of a subaerial Large Igneous Province that facilitated the generation of 18 O-depleted magmas. Depending on whether the 2.6-2.4 Ga zircons with low δ 18 O values (<4.7‰) are considered or not, approximately 2.77‰ or 1.78‰ rise in the zircon δ 18 O values occurred between ca. 2.4 Ga and ca. 1.87 Ga (decoupled from zircon Lu-Hf isotopes), further suggesting that the fine-grained sediments were enriched in 18 O after the Great Oxidation Event. These high δ 18 O sediments were subsequently incorporated into the magmatic systems resulting in elevated δ 18 O in the zircons crystallizing from such melts. Nevertheless, a ca. 0.9 Ga peak of >10‰ in δ 18 O system was followed by a pronounced δ 18 O drop at ca. 0.759 Ga, suggesting that δ 18 O of recycled sedimentary reservoirs was not the only controlling factor for zircon δ 18 O characteristics. Variations in the O-Hf data for Indian and global zircons could be attributed to the initiation of the supercontinent cycle at ca. 2.0 Ga. A significant volume of the juvenile crust was added during the 3.0 - 2.7 Ga mafic magmatism in the Indian Shield, as underlined by the Hf model ages of all the zircon grains and those with mantle-like δ 18 O signatures. A gradual addition of continental crust during ca. 3.6 Ga to 3.1 Ga can also be deduced, with the oldest crust being derived from the mantle at ca. 4.4 Ga.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?