Zircon Lu-Hf Isotope Study of Ultrahigh-Pressure Eclogite and Granitic Gneiss in the Dabie Orogen

Zheng Y F,Chen R X,Zhang S B,Tang J,Zhao Z F,Wu Y B
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.02.012
IF: 1.468
2007-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:Zircon Lu-Hf isotopic analyses were carried out for ultrahigh-pressure eclogite and granitic gneiss from the Dabie orogen. Together with zircon U-Pb dating, the results provide constraints on their protolith origin, with significant implications for growth of continental crust by rift magmatism during breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia. Analyses and comparison of combined U-Pb and LuHf isotopes in different domains of igneous and metamorphic zircons indicate that different origins of zircons show considerable differences in Pb-206/U-238 age, initial Hf isotope ratio, Th/U and Lu/Hf ratios. Metamorphically grown zircons have lower Th/U and Lu/Hf ratios but higher epsilon(Hf)(t) values than igneous core and mantle. There are positive correlations between Th/U and Lu/Hf ratios for metamorphically reworked zircons, suggesting similar effects of eclogite-facies metamorphism on zircon U-Th-Pb and Lu-Hf isotope systems. Therefore, high-grade metamorphism can cause an increase in Hf-176/Hf-177 ratios for metamorphically grown grain or domain, resulting in enhanced epsilon(Hf) (t) values as if crystallizing from juvenile crust. Hence caution must be exercised when interpreting metamorphic zircon Hf isotope data for the purpose of source tracing. Zircon U-Pb dating for igneous cores from both eclogite and gneiss clearly indicate bimodal magmatism at about 750Ma, with a minor incorporation of juvenile crust in an age of 2.15Ga. Initial Hf isotope ratios can be categorized into two groups, first with positive epsilon(Hf)(t) values of 5.9 +/- 0. 9 to 12.9 +/- 0. 7 and second with neutral epsilon(Hf)(t) values of -4.3 +/- 0. 5 to 2.3 +/- 0. 3 around zero. The positive epsilon(Hf)( t) values correspond to young Hf model ages mostly on early Neoproterozoic and late Mesoproterozoic, whereas negative epsilon(Hf)(t) values to Paleoproterozoic Hf model ages. The former implies growth of continental crust by extraction of juvenile crust from the depleted mantle along rifting volcanic margins at middle Neoproterozoic, with contemporaneous crust-mantle interaction in rifting tectonic zones. Both growth and reworking of juvenile and ancient crusts are evident in the protoliths of both eclogite and gneiss, with prompt reworking of juvenile crust at each time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?