Abstract:Current approaches to biodiversity conservation are largely based on geographic areas, ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, with less attention on genetic diversity and the evolutionary continuum from populations to species. Conservation management generally rests on discrete categories, such as identified species, and, for threated taxa, intraspecific units. Species, in particular, provide a common measure of biodiversity yet in both theory and nature, speciation is typically a protracted process progressing from connected populations to unambiguous species with variable rates of phenotypic, ecological and genetic divergence. Thus, most recognized species are not genetically uniform and are sometimes highly structured into historically isolated populations worthy of consideration as intraspecific units that represent unique genetic diversity for conservation. Genome screens offer unprecedented resolution of structure across taxonomic boundaries in species complexes, and have the potential to oversplit species if not interpreted conservatively. This highlights the blurred line between populations and species, and can confound simple dichotomies of “species” vs. “not species.” At the same time, like plants, there is increasing evidence that even distantly related animal species can hybridize and exchange genes. A review of conservation legislation reveals that legal definitions of “species” are quite flexible and can accommodate a range of infra-specifictaxa and divergent populations, as well as taxonomically recognized species. For example, the legislative definition of a species around the world can include: species, subspecies, varieties, and geographically and/or genetically distinct populations. In principle, this flexibility allows for protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of evolutionary processes at a broad range of infra-specific levels. However, evolutionary biologists often fail to adequately justify and then translate their evidence for genetically defined units into categories suited to assessment under local legislation. We recommend that (i) genomic data should be interpreted conservatively when formally naming species, (ii) concomitantly, there should be stronger impetus and a more uniform approach to identifying clearly justified intraspecific units, (iii) guidelines be developed for recognizing and labeling intraspecific data that align with best scientific practice, and (iv) that the more nuanced view of species and speciation emerging from genomic analyses is communicated more effectively by scientists to decision makers.

How is the concept of charisma used in the academic literature about biodiversity conservation? A systematic map protocol

Charismatic megafauna, regional identity, and invasive species: what role does environmental archaeology play in contemporary conservation efforts?

The concept that went viral: Using machine learning to discover charisma in the wild

A systematic review of animal personality in conservation science

Using Wikipedia to measure public interest in biodiversity and conservation

Cryptic species conservation: a review

The significance of meaning. Why IPBES needs the social sciences and humanities

Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science

Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management

Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation

Global trends in geospatial conservation planning: a review of priorities and missing dimensions

A systematic survey of the integration of animal behavior into conservation

How the diversity of human concepts of nature affects conservation of biodiversity

Innovative communication strategies for promoting urban wildlife habitat conservation

Big data, big problems? How to circumvent problems in biodiversity mapping and ensure meaningful results

Participatory research in complex marine conservation settings: A review of recent trends and lessons for the future

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies

How is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance? A systematic map protocol

Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management