Abstract:Background: Neurofeedback is a non-invasive brain training technique used to enhance and treat hyperactivity disorder by altering the patterns of brain activity. Nonetheless, the extent of enhancement by neurofeedback varies among individuals/patients and many of them are irresponsive to this treatment technique. Therefore, several studies have been conducted to predict the effectiveness of neurofeedback training including the theta/beta protocol with a specific emphasize on slow cortical potential (SCP) before initiating treatment, as well as examining SCP criteria according to age and sex criteria in diverse populations. While some of these studies failed to make accurate predictions, others have demonstrated low success rates. This study explores functional connections within various brain lobes across different frequency bands of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and the value of phase locking is used to predict the potential effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment before its initiation. Methods: This study utilized EEG data from the Mendelian database. In this database, EEG signals were recorded during neurofeedback sessions involving 60 hyperactive students aged 7-14 years, irrespective of sex. These students were categorized into treatable and non-treatable. The proposed method includes a five-step algorithm. Initially, the data underwent preprocessing to reduce noise using a multi-stage filtering process. The second step involved extracting alpha and beta frequency bands from the preprocessed EEG signals, with a particular emphasis on the EEG recorded from sessions 10 to 20 of neurofeedback therapy. In the third step, the method assessed the disparity in brain signals between the two groups by evaluating functional relationships in different brain lobes using the phase lock value, a crucial data characteristic. The fourth step focused on reducing the feature space and identifying the most effective and optimal electrodes for neurofeedback treatment. Two methods, the probability index (p-value) via a t-test and the genetic algorithm, were employed. These methods showed that the optimal electrodes were in the frontal lobe and central cerebral cortex, notably channels C3, FZ, F4, CZ, C4, and F3, as they exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Finally, in the fifth step, machine learning classifiers were applied, and the results were combined to generate treatable and non-treatable labels for each dataset. Results: Among the classifiers, the support vector machine and the boosting method demonstrated the highest accuracy when combined. Consequently, the proposed algorithm successfully predicted the treatability of individuals with hyperactivity in a short time and with limited data, achieving an accuracy of 90.6% in the neurofeedback method. Additionally, it effectively identified key electrodes in neurofeedback treatment, reducing their number from 32 to 6. Conclusions: This study introduces an algorithm with a 90.6% accuracy for predicting neurofeedback treatment outcomes in hyperactivity disorder, significantly enhancing treatment efficiency by identifying optimal electrodes and reducing their number from 32 to 6. The proposed method enables the prediction of patient responsiveness to neurofeedback therapy without the need for numerous sessions, thus conserving time and financial resources.

Exploring neurofeedback as a therapeutic intervention for subjective cognitive decline

Exploring the Effects of EEG-Based Alpha Neurofeedback on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Participants

Self-Modulation of Gamma-Band Synchronization through EEG-Neurofeedback Training in the Elderly

Beta wave enhancement neurofeedback improves cognitive functions in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary pilot study

Real‐time Memory‐related Neurofeedback Training Improves Intrinsic Brain Oscillations in Older Adults

Neurofeedback and the Aging Brain: A Systematic Review of Training Protocols for Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

[Neurofeedback in the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with early cerebral small vessel disease]

Effects of one session of theta or high alpha neurofeedback on EEG activity and working memory

Neurofeedback technique based on mismatched negativity in improvement of cognitive function

Effects of neurofeedback training on the alpha activity in quantitative electroencephalography, cognitive function, and speech perception in elderly with presbycusis: a quasi-experimental study

Neurofeedback Training with a Motor Imagery-Based BCI Improves Neurocognitive Functions in Elderly People

Individualized EEG-Based Neurofeedback Targeting Auditory Steady-State Responses: A Proof-of-Concept Study

A Game-Based Neurofeedback Training System to Enhance Cognitive Performance in Healthy Elderly Subjects and in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Effectiveness of Electroencephalography Neurofeedback for Improving Working Memory and Episodic Memory in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis

Electrophysiological correlates of improved executive function following EEG neurofeedback in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Enhancing Working Memory Based on Mismatch Negativity Neurofeedback in Subjective Cognitive Decline Patients: A Preliminary Study.

EEG subject-dependent neurofeedback training selectively impairs declarative memories consolidation process

Methodology and feasibility of neurofeedback to improve visual attention to letters in mild Alzheimer's disease

Utilizing Phase Locking Value to Determine Neurofeedback Treatment Responsiveness in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Brain Exercising Games With Consumer-Grade Single-Channel Electroencephalogram Neurofeedback: Pre-Post Intervention Study

The Effect of Alpha Neurofeedback Training on Cognitive Performance in Healthy Adults