Abstract:ProblemClerkship grades contribute to a summative assessment culture in clerkships and can therefore interfere with students' learning. For example, by focusing on summative, tiered clerkship grades, students often discount accompanying feedback that could inform future learning. This case report seeks to explore whether an assessment system intervention which eliminated tiered grades and enhanced feedback was associated with changes in student perceptions of clerkship assessment and perceptions of the clinical learning environment. Intervention: In January 2019, our institution eliminated tiered clerkship grading (honors/pass/fail) for medical students during the core clerkship year and implemented pass/fail clerkship grading along with required twice weekly, work-based assessments for formative feedback. Context: In this single institution, cross-sectional survey study, we collected data from fourth-year medical students one year after an assessment system intervention. The intervention entailed changing from honors/pass/fail to pass/fail grading in all eight core clerkships and implementing an electronic system to record twice-weekly real-time formative work-based assessments. The survey queried student perceptions on the fairness and accuracy of grading and the clinical learning environment-including whether clerkships were mastery- or performance-oriented. We compared responses from students one year after the assessment intervention to those from the class one year before the intervention. Comparisons were made using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests or chi-squared tests as appropriate with Cohen's d for effect size estimation for score differences. Content analysis was used to analyze responses from two open-ended questions about feedback and grading. Impact: Survey response rates were similar before and after intervention (76% (127/168) vs. 72% (118/163), respectively) with no between-group differences in demographics. The after-intervention group showed statistically significant increases in the following factors: "grades are transparent and fair" (Cohen's d = 0.80), "students receive useful feedback" (d = 0.51), and "resident evaluation procedures are fair" (d = 0.40). After-intervention respondents perceived the clerkship learning environment to be more mastery-oriented (d = 0.52), less performance approach-oriented (d = 0.63), and less performance avoid-oriented (d = 0.49). There were no statistical differences in the factors "attending evaluation procedures are fair," "evaluations are accurate," "evaluations are biased," or "perception of stereotype threat." Open-ended questions revealed student recommendations to improve clerkship summary narratives, burden of work-based assessment, and in-person feedback. Lessons Learned: After an assessment system change to pass/fail grading with work-based assessments, we observed moderate to large improvements in student perceptions of clerkship grading and the mastery orientation of the learning environment. Our intervention did not improve perceptions around bias in assessment in clerkships. Other medical schools may consider similar interventions to begin to address student concerns with clerkship assessment and promote a more adaptive learning environment.

The death of exams? Grade inflation and student satisfaction when coursework replaces exams

Grades for glory? The impact of grade appeasement on business school teacher evaluations

Grade Inflation and Stunted Effort in a Curved Economics Course

The effects of more informative grading on student outcomes

Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course

A new explanation for grade inflation: the long-term development of German university grades

The impact of the pointless system of grading in an undergraduate physiology class

Exam as an instrument for student-active learning in STEM education – An example from a reliability analysis course

Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback

Exam reform: an opportunity for the redistribution of academic power

Decomposing university grades: a longitudinal study of students and their instructors

Grading by Category: A simple method for providing students with meaningful feedback on exams in large courses

A tale of two algorithms: The appeal and repeal of calculated grades systems in England and Ireland in 2020

Assessing Selected Teaching Techniques and Their Impact on Student Success in the Classroom

An Exploratory Study of Student Perceptions of Ungrading in Upper-Level Psychology Courses

An Analysis of Programming Course Evaluations Before and After the Introduction of an Autograder

Low-Stakes, Growth-Oriented Testing in Large-Enrollment General Chemistry 1: Formulation, Implementation, and Statistical Analysis

Examination in Accordance with Aptitude: Selection and Optimization of Curriculum Assessment Methods in Higher Education Adapted to the Teacher–Student Game Behaviors

The Distribution of College Grades across Fields in the Contemporary University

Death of an outcome – consequences of stigmergy in our examinations

Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning