Abstract:ProblemClerkship grades contribute to a summative assessment culture in clerkships and can therefore interfere with students' learning. For example, by focusing on summative, tiered clerkship grades, students often discount accompanying feedback that could inform future learning. This case report seeks to explore whether an assessment system intervention which eliminated tiered grades and enhanced feedback was associated with changes in student perceptions of clerkship assessment and perceptions of the clinical learning environment. Intervention: In January 2019, our institution eliminated tiered clerkship grading (honors/pass/fail) for medical students during the core clerkship year and implemented pass/fail clerkship grading along with required twice weekly, work-based assessments for formative feedback. Context: In this single institution, cross-sectional survey study, we collected data from fourth-year medical students one year after an assessment system intervention. The intervention entailed changing from honors/pass/fail to pass/fail grading in all eight core clerkships and implementing an electronic system to record twice-weekly real-time formative work-based assessments. The survey queried student perceptions on the fairness and accuracy of grading and the clinical learning environment-including whether clerkships were mastery- or performance-oriented. We compared responses from students one year after the assessment intervention to those from the class one year before the intervention. Comparisons were made using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests or chi-squared tests as appropriate with Cohen's d for effect size estimation for score differences. Content analysis was used to analyze responses from two open-ended questions about feedback and grading. Impact: Survey response rates were similar before and after intervention (76% (127/168) vs. 72% (118/163), respectively) with no between-group differences in demographics. The after-intervention group showed statistically significant increases in the following factors: "grades are transparent and fair" (Cohen's d = 0.80), "students receive useful feedback" (d = 0.51), and "resident evaluation procedures are fair" (d = 0.40). After-intervention respondents perceived the clerkship learning environment to be more mastery-oriented (d = 0.52), less performance approach-oriented (d = 0.63), and less performance avoid-oriented (d = 0.49). There were no statistical differences in the factors "attending evaluation procedures are fair," "evaluations are accurate," "evaluations are biased," or "perception of stereotype threat." Open-ended questions revealed student recommendations to improve clerkship summary narratives, burden of work-based assessment, and in-person feedback. Lessons Learned: After an assessment system change to pass/fail grading with work-based assessments, we observed moderate to large improvements in student perceptions of clerkship grading and the mastery orientation of the learning environment. Our intervention did not improve perceptions around bias in assessment in clerkships. Other medical schools may consider similar interventions to begin to address student concerns with clerkship assessment and promote a more adaptive learning environment.

An Exploratory Study of Student Perceptions of Ungrading in Upper-Level Psychology Courses

Implementation of ungrading in the pharmacy curriculum

Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course

PUSHING BACK AGAINST AI: USING UNGRADING TO PROMOTE CRITICAL THINKING AND INTRINSIC MOTIVATION

The Promise of Labor-Based Grading Contracts for the Teaching of Psychology and Neuroscience

From Grading to Assessment for Learning: A Qualitative Study of Student Perceptions Surrounding Elimination of Core Clerkship Grades and Enhanced Formative Feedback

The impact of the pointless system of grading in an undergraduate physiology class

Bringing Radical Assessment into Radical Political Economy: An Ungrading Experience

Use of Contract Grading to Improve Grades Among College Freshmen in Introductory Psychology

Leveling Up Learning: Exploring Meaningful Gamification in Psychology Courses

How to assess? Student preferences for methods to assess experiential learning: A best-worst scaling approach

Emotional and Cognitive Responses to Academic Performance and Grade Anxiety

Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors

Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback

Grades, Student Satisfaction and Retention in Online and Face-to-Face Introductory Psychology Units: A Test of Equivalency Theory

An Evaluation of Asynchronous Online Discussion Board Formats in Interteaching

Two examples of ungrading in higher education from the United States and from Germany

An Analysis of Programming Course Evaluations Before and After the Introduction of an Autograder

Validity concerns with the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in undergraduate anatomy & physiology students

Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations

Perceived Student Benefits of an Undergraduate Physiological Psychology Laboratory Course