Examining How Interaural Differences Owing to Head Rotation during Walking Improve the Distance of Auditory Obstacle Perceptions among Individuals with Visual Impairment: A Case Study in Small-Scale Blind Group

Takahiro Miura,Naoyuki Okochi,Masaki Matsuo,Ken-ichiro Yabu,Atsushi Katagiri,Keiichi Yasu,Masatsugu Sakajiri,Tohru Ifukube

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030356

2024-03-08

Life

Abstract:The ability of individuals with visual impairment to recognize an obstacle by hearing is called "obstacle sense". This ability is facilitated while they are moving, though the exact reason remains unknown. This study aims to clarify which acoustical factors may contribute to obstacle sense, especially obstacle distance perception. First, we conducted a comparative experiment regarding obstacle distance localization by individuals who are blind (N = 5, five men with blindness aged 22–42 (average: 29.8)) while they were standing and walking. The results indicate that the localized distance was more accurate while walking than while standing. Subsequently, the head rotation angle while walking and acoustic characteristics with respect to obstacle distance and head rotation angle were investigated. The peaks of the absolute head rotation angle during walking ranged from 2.78° to 11.11° (average: 6.55°, S.D.: 2.05°). Regarding acoustic characteristics, acoustic coloration occurred, and spectral interaural differences and interaural intensity differences were observed in the blind participants (N = 4, four men including two blind and two control sighted persons aged 25–38 (average: 30.8)). To determine which acoustic factors contribute, we examined the threshold of changes for interaural differences in time (ITD) and intensity (IID) (N = 11, seven men and four women with blindness aged 21–35 (average: 27.4)), as well as coloration (ICD) (N = 6, seven men and a woman with blindness aged 21–38 (average: 29.9))—depending on the head rotation. Notably, ITD and IID thresholds were 86.2 μs and 1.28 dB; the corresponding head rotation angles were 23.5° and 9.17°, respectively. The angle of the ICD threshold was 6.30° on average. Consequently, IID might be a contributing factor and ICD can be utilized as the cue facilitating the obstacle distance perception while walking.

biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve

This paper aims to explore why visually impaired individuals are more accurate in recognizing obstacles through auditory perception (referred to as "obstacle perception") while walking. Specifically, the study seeks to clarify which acoustic factors contribute to obstacle perception, particularly the perception of obstacle distance.

#### Research Background and Objectives
- **Background**: Previous studies have shown that visually impaired individuals can recognize the presence of objects through auditory information, even for stationary and untouchable objects. This ability may be achieved through changes in the reflection, absorption, or insulation of various sounds in the environment (such as traffic noise, human voices, and other continuous noises).
- **Objective**: The study aims to identify which acoustic cues are generated by body movement and head rotation, and how these cues contribute to accurate obstacle distance perception. If this mechanism can be elucidated, the research findings will aid in the systematic development of auditory localization rehabilitation methods and the design of assistive devices for the blind.

#### Experimental Design and Findings
- **Experiment 1**: Compared the accuracy of obstacle distance localization in visually impaired participants under static conditions (standing still) and dynamic conditions (walking towards a target). Results showed that localization was more accurate under dynamic conditions.
- **Experiment 2**: Measured the angle of head rotation during walking and analyzed the acoustic characteristics related to obstacle distance. The study found that the head rotation angle varied between 2.78° and 11.11°, with an average of 6.55°.
- **Experiment 3**: Examined the impact of interaural time difference (ITD), interaural intensity difference (IID), and interaural color difference (ICD) on obstacle distance perception. Results indicated that IID might be one of the influencing factors, while ICD could serve as a cue for obstacle distance perception while walking.

In summary, through systematic experimental design and data analysis, this paper explores how visually impaired individuals utilize acoustic changes to improve the accuracy of obstacle distance perception while walking.