Evaluating Survey Items of Buddhism Religiosity in China
Anning Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edx018
2018-01-01
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Abstract:Over the past few decades, public opinion studies have paid increasing attention to the comparison of eastern and western religions, an endeavor that calls for a rigorous evaluation of empirical measures of religiosity for eastern religions. This study investigates the applicability to Chinese Buddhism of a measurement scheme based on believing, belonging, and behaving (the Three Bs). Confirmatory factor analyses of the Chinese Spiritual Life Survey suggest that the Three Bs are valid measures of Buddhist religiosity as they converge to the same latent construct. They are also reliable survey instruments, as illustrated by measurement invariance across subpopulations defined by differences in region of residence, gender, cohort, and education. The Three Bs measurement scheme has potential for empirical comparative research. It has been noted that religion is strongly related to individual attitudes toward political parties, abortion, gay rights, and foreign policy, to name a few (Baumgartner, Francia, & Morris, 2008; Clements, 2014a; Eisenstein, 2006). With the rise in cross-national comparative studies, various religions, especially ones from the East, have begun to enter the research agenda of empirical researchers (Bender, Cadge, Levitt, & Smilde, 2012; Cadge, Levitt, & Smilde 2011; Gonzalez, 2011; Tanaka, 2010). This brings the following questions to the fore: How can researchers measure religious involvement in different religions using survey instruments? More importantly, is it possible to gauge religiosity in different religions with a common measurement scheme?1