Theoretical frameworks

D Polit, C Beck

2017-01-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Estruturas teóricas e conceituais

DF Polit, CT Beck, BP Hungler

2004-01-01

Abstract:
The miss of the framework

Paul E Smaldino,Paul E. Smaldino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x23002315

2024-01-01

Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract:Abstract The authors rightly critique existing social sciences approaches. However, they are too quick to dismiss the criticism that their proposed paradigm is atheoretical. Social and cognitive theories are indeed incommensurate, often due to the lack of a unifying framework. Without proper integration with theoretical frameworks, their proposal may merely produce a resource-intensive veneer of thoroughness without substantive improvements to understanding.

behavioral sciences,neurosciences,psychology, biological
Uncertainty, the Problem of Order, and Markets: a Critique of Beckert, Theory and Society, May 2009

Kurtuluş Gemici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9158-0

2012-01-01

Theory and Society

Abstract:Jens Beckert’s 2009 article on the constitution and dynamics of markets is a bold attempt to define a novel research agenda. Deeming uncertainty and coordination essential for the constitution of social action in markets, Beckert proposes a framework centered on the resolution of three coordination problems: valuation, cooperation, and competition. The empirical study of these three coordination problems has the potential to contribute considerably to the sociological analysis of markets. However, the assertion that such a theoretical vantage point can explain the constitution and dynamics of markets is not compelling because it (1) conflates social interaction with social structures, (2) fails to address power relations, institutions, and macro-level structures, and (3) neglects the historically contingent and socially contested nature of markets themselves. The present article shows that these three pitfalls are the result of starting from the problem of order and building upon uncertainty as the basis of action in markets, lending the suggested framework a methodologically individualist bent. Therefore, Beckert’s suggested framework is in danger of mystifying the very power relations, institutions, and macro-level structures that are at the heart of the constitution and dynamics of markets.
Research methods

Denise F Polit, CT Beck, BP Hungler

2012-01-01

Abstract:
Essentials of

DF Polit, CT Beck, BP Hungler

2001-01-01

Abstract:
What is a framework? Understanding their purpose, value, development and use

Stefan Partelow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00833-w

2023-04-15

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Abstract:Many frameworks exist across the sciences and science-policy interface, but it is not always clear how they are developed or can be applied. It is also often vague how new or existing frameworks are positioned in a theory of science to advance a specific theory or paradigm. This article examines these questions and positions the role of frameworks as integral but often vague scientific tools, highlighting benefits and critiques. While frameworks can be useful for synthesizing and communicating core concepts in a field, they often lack transparency in how they were developed and how they can be applied. Positioning frameworks within a theory of science can aid in knowing the purpose and value of framework use. This article provides a meta-framework for visualizing and engaging the four mediating processes for framework development and application: (1) empirical generalization, (2) theoretical fitting, (3) application, and (4) hypothesizing. Guiding points for scholars and policymakers using or developing frameworks in their research are provided in closing.
Specific types of quantitative research

DF Polit, C Beck

2012-01-01

Abstract:
Theoretical frameworks cited in Nursing Research from January 1974–June 1985

CHERYL TATANO BECK

1985-11-01

Abstract:The frequency of the most commonly used theoretical frameworks in Nursing Research and their references plus trends in their use are identified for January 1974-June 1985. The results of this literature review can be used as a reference guide for both nursing faculty and graduate students to aid them in selecting theoretical frameworks for research projects or theses.
A theoretical framework of organizational change

Gabriele Jacobs,Arjen van Witteloostuijn,Jochen Christe‐Zeyse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137

2013-08-23

Journal of Organizational Change Management

Abstract:Purpose Organizational change is a risky endeavour. Most change initiatives fall short on their goals and produce high opportunity and process costs, which at times outweigh the content benefits of organizational change. This paper seeks to develop a framework, offering a theoretical toolbox to analyze context‐dependent barriers and enablers of organizational change. Starting from an organizational identity perspective, it aims to link contingency‐based approaches, such as environmental scan, SWOT and stakeholder analysis, with insights from organizational behaviour research, such as knowledge sharing and leadership. Design/methodology/approach The framework is informed by long‐lasting field research into organizational change in an international policing environment. The theories in the framework are selected from the perspective of field validity in two ways; they were chosen because the topics covered by these theories emerged as relevant during the field research and therefore it can be expected they have applicability to the field. The authors' insights and suggestions are summarised in 13 propositions throughout the text. Findings The analysis provides a clear warning that organizational change is more risky and multifaceted than change initiators typically assume. It is stressed that the external environment and the internal dynamics of organizations co‐determine the meaning of managerial practices. This implies that cure‐all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail. Originality/value This paper makes an ambitious attempt to cross disciplinary boundaries in the field of organizational change research to contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of change processes by integrating perspectives that focus on the internal context and the external environment of organizations.

management
Qualitative descriptive studies

D Polit, C Beck

2014-01-01

Abstract:
Analyzing quantitative data

DF Polit, C Beck, B Hungler

2006-01-01

Abstract:
The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

Lara Varpio,Elise Paradis,Sebastian Uijtdehaage,Meredith Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003075

IF: 7.84

2019-11-12

Academic Medicine

Abstract:Health professions education (HPE) researchers are regularly asked to articulate their use of theory, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks in their research. However, all too often, these words are used interchangeably or without a clear understanding of the differences between these concepts. Further problematizing this situation is the fact that theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework are terms that are used in different ways in different research approaches. In this article, the authors set out to clarify the meaning of these terms and to describe how they are used in 2 approaches to research commonly used in HPE: the objectivist deductive approach (from theory to data) and the subjectivist inductive approach (from data to theory). In addition to this, given that within subjectivist inductive research theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework can be used in different ways, they describe 3 uses that HPE researchers frequently rely on: fully inductive theory development, fully theory-informed inductive, and theory-informing inductive data analysis.

education, scientific disciplines,health care sciences & services
The Conceptual Framework: A Practical Guide

John Kulesa,Spandana Induru,Elizabeth Hubbard,Priti Bhansali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007794

2024-11-01

Abstract:There is no single definition of the conceptual framework (CF) or consensus on how it is best applied in the research process. However, in this piece, the authors argue that the CF is a tool used to link the literature review, research methodology, and study design. The CF grounds the study in the previous literature, theories, and models. It helps the researcher articulate their rationale for why the study should be performed, justify their study design, and describe the lens through which they analyze a phenomenon or research question. Researchers may find the variable use of terms such as theory, theoretical framework, and CF to be confusing. The authors address the distinction between these terms and present strategies to develop and use the CF throughout the research process. The authors provide practical examples and resources for additional learning.
Beck. C.(2004)

D Polit

Abstract:
Trustworthiness and rigor in qualitative research

D Polit, C Beck

2020-01-01

Abstract:
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

Per Nilsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0

2015-04-21

Implementation Science

Abstract:BackgroundImplementation science has progressed towards increased use of theoretical approaches to provide better understanding and explanation of how and why implementation succeeds or fails. The aim of this article is to propose a taxonomy that distinguishes between different categories of theories, models and frameworks in implementation science, to facilitate appropriate selection and application of relevant approaches in implementation research and practice and to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among implementation researchers.DiscussionTheoretical approaches used in implementation science have three overarching aims: describing and/or guiding the process of translating research into practice (process models); understanding and/or explaining what influences implementation outcomes (determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories); and evaluating implementation (evaluation frameworks).SummaryThis article proposes five categories of theoretical approaches to achieve three overarching aims. These categories are not always recognized as separate types of approaches in the literature. While there is overlap between some of the theories, models and frameworks, awareness of the differences is important to facilitate the selection of relevant approaches. Most determinant frameworks provide limited “how-to” support for carrying out implementation endeavours since the determinants usually are too generic to provide sufficient detail for guiding an implementation process. And while the relevance of addressing barriers and enablers to translating research into practice is mentioned in many process models, these models do not identify or systematically structure specific determinants associated with implementation success. Furthermore, process models recognize a temporal sequence of implementation endeavours, whereas determinant frameworks do not explicitly take a process perspective of implementation.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
An integrative framework of conflict and control

Daniela Becker,Erik Bijleveld,Senne Braem,Kerstin Fröber,Felix J Götz,Tali Kleiman,Anita Körner,Roland Pfister,Andrea M F Reiter,Blair Saunders,Iris K Schneider,Alexander Soutschek,Henk van Steenbergen,David Dignath

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.002

Abstract:People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action-goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework's key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.
Hedgehogs, foxes, blueprints, and skeletons: Untangling the murky complexity of theoretical and conceptual frameworks

Brahim Hiba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103468

IF: 8.514

2024-05-01

Energy Research & Social Science

Abstract:The terms “theoretical framework” and “conceptual framework” are often sources of confusion and debate. Doctoral students and novice researchers usually struggle to discern the disparities between these two threshold concepts. Despite the extensive literature on theoretical and conceptual frameworks, the complex and technical jargon used is sometimes perplexing. Furthermore, the information about these concepts is usually scattered across lengthy academic texts, which makes it arduous for those new to social research to fully grasp. Additionally, there is a scarcity of comprehensive articles that effectively synthesize and illuminate the similarities and differences between theoretical and conceptual frameworks. To address this gap, this paper provides a theoretical dissection of the epistemological and philosophical underpinnings that differentiate and, at times, intertwine theoretical and conceptual frameworks. To do this, this paper not only re-examines familiar metaphors found in the literature like the blueprint metaphor and the house metaphor but also introduces five original metaphors to elucidate the differences between theoretical and conceptual frameworks. These metaphors are the skeleton metaphor, the joints-vessels metaphor, the hedgehog metaphor, the fox metaphor, and the zoom lens metaphor. The paper's findings reveal that theoretical and conceptual frameworks are not synonymous or interchangeable, but they are also not entirely mutually exclusive, as theoretical analysis shows that the conventional boundaries between them sometimes overlap. Accordingly, the fresh metaphors offered by this paper may catalyze transcending rigid frameworks by inviting researchers to critically examine pre-established structures, cross traditional epistemological borders, and act as “nomads” moving freely between theories and concepts to develop innovative research perspectives.

environmental studies
A New Conceptual Framework and Approach to Decision Making in Public Policy

Francisco Banha,Adão Flores,Luís Serra Coelho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2040032

2022-09-20

Knowledge

Abstract:In this conceptual paper, we bring forward a new theoretical proposition in the form of an Integrated Policy-Making Process Framework. This tool arose from the discussion and hypothesis that the main models used to analyse public policies have practical and theoretical limitations and/or are due for an update, especially when it comes to the study of phenomena with many actors involved, vast legislation, large timeframes, and high degrees of complexity. Our original model encompasses the three fundamental stages of the public policy cycle (agenda; decision making; implementation). Our approach can have a wide spectrum of applications and contribute to the field of knowledge of political sciences. Our proposal of using three frameworks in an integrated way enables researchers and users to gain a holistic vision concerning policy processes, and it offers the possibility to compare and rank categories. The Integrated Policy-Making Process Framework is thus proposed as a new tool to tackle research and studies on decision making in public policies and the policy-making cycle.
Processes of quantitative data analysis

DF Polit, CT Beck

2017-01-01

Abstract:

Theoretical frameworks

Estruturas teóricas e conceituais

The miss of the framework

Uncertainty, the Problem of Order, and Markets: a Critique of Beckert, Theory and Society, May 2009

Research methods

Essentials of

What is a framework? Understanding their purpose, value, development and use

Specific types of quantitative research

Theoretical frameworks cited in Nursing Research from January 1974–June 1985

A theoretical framework of organizational change

Qualitative descriptive studies

Analyzing quantitative data

The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

The Conceptual Framework: A Practical Guide

Beck. C.(2004)

Trustworthiness and rigor in qualitative research

Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

An integrative framework of conflict and control

Hedgehogs, foxes, blueprints, and skeletons: Untangling the murky complexity of theoretical and conceptual frameworks

A New Conceptual Framework and Approach to Decision Making in Public Policy

Processes of quantitative data analysis