How and Why Do Policy Paradigms Change; and Does It Matter? The Case of UK Energy Policy
Florian Kern,Caroline Kuzemko,Catherine Mitchell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_13
2015-01-01
Abstract:It has long been argued that materialist explanations (i.e. focusing exclusively on interests) of policy-making and institutional change are limited and that concepts developed within the ‘new’ institutionalism may provide some extra explanatory depth (Blyth, 2002; Fischer, 2003; Widmaier, Blyth, & Seabrooke, 2007). The ‘new’ institutionalism, formed in the 1980s and 1990s as a response to rational choice and behaviouralism, sought to ‘bring the state back in’ to the explanation of political action (Hall & Taylor, 1996; Peters, 2005). Sociological and constructivist variants of new institutionalism have built upon Hall’s (1993) seminal work on policy paradigms in order to provide explanations of the role ideas play in policy and institutional change (e.g. see Béland & Cox, 2013; Carson, Burns, & Calvo, 2009; Daigneault, 2013; Kern, 2011; Kuzemko, 2013; Menahem, 2008; Murphy, 2012; Niemelä & Saarinen, 2012). These analyses proceed from the observation that frameworks of ideas colour not only how a policy problem is understood, but also policy choices and institutional structures. Likewise, frameworks of ideas can also impact heavily upon processes of institutional change, often understood as happening in response to crises. Ideas and their expression in the form of narratives are understood as being capable of convincing groups within society that there is a crisis, that existing policy is failing to solve the crisis, and that alternative solutions should be pursued.