Abstract:Abstract Background Among promising markers for neurodegenerative disorders, electroencephalogram (EEG) represents a non‐invasive and potentially portable alternative. Standardized methods for preprocessing may contribute to less inter‐observer variability, while pooling multi‐centric EEG data may provide more generalizable results. We aim to formulate a reproducible pipeline for group‐level classification (of Parkinson’s Disease ‐PD‐) based on various features of resting‐state EEG recordings (rsEEG) collected in multi‐site studies. Methods We used four datasets (acquired in Colombia, Finland, and the USA) consisting of 169 subjects (84 PD; 85 non‐PD healthy controls). Our workflow included rsEEG raw files standardization, preprocessing, spectral bandpowers and multiple entropy features extraction on sensor space, harmonization of multi‐site features, and group‐level multiclass classification using supervised machine learning methods. Center/scanner‐related variability effects in the extracted features were harmonized using the ComBat approach and its variants 1 . Finally, sequential feature selection (SFS) and binary classification (Non‐PD vs. PD) was conducted using XGradientBoosting 2 . The full workflow is detailed in Figure 1. Results t‐distributed stochastic neighbor embedded (tSNE) plots showed that center‐related variability in spectral features was reduced after harmonization using the ComBat method and its bootstrapped variant, Figure 2. SFS of rsEEG features was performed on 224 harmonized features, showing the highest performance when alpha, pre‐alpha, and slow‐theta bands were considered for subsequent classification. The XGradientBoosting classifier showed an AUC of 0.826 in separating PD from non‐PD, Figure 3. Conclusions In multicenter studies, the harmonization of rsEEG features at the sensor space using ComBat can contribute to controlling batch effects. XGradientBoosting with rsEEG features and SFS performed well in classifying non‐PD vs. PD. Intended to be a practical tool for group‐level analysis of neurodegenerative disorders based on sensor space rsEEG features, our workflow is openly available at (https://github.com/alberto‐jj/raw_to_classification) and can be easily adapted to multi‐class classification and regression tasks. References 1. Da‐ano, R., et al. Sci. Rep . 10 , 10 (2020). 2. Moguilner, S., et al. J. Neural Eng . 19 , 046048 (2022).

MEG/EEG group study with MNE: recommendations, quality assessments and best practices

MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data

MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python

MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm

Bayesian Model Selection Maps for Group Studies Using M/EEG Data

Statistical power: Implications for planning MEG studies

Multi-subject MEG/EEG source imaging with sparse multi-task regression

Understanding data analysis aspects of TMS-EEG in clinical study: a mini review and a case study with open dataset

Managing EEG studies: How to prepare and what to do once data collection has begun

Introducing MEG-MASC a high-quality magneto-encephalography dataset for evaluating natural speech processing

Choosing MUSE: Validation of a Low-Cost, Portable EEG System for ERP Research

Inter-individual single-trial classification of MEG data using M-CCA

Reproducible Python workflow for multi‐site resting‐state EEG analysis: From raw data to group classification

Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis

MEG-MASC: a high-quality magneto-encephalography dataset for evaluating natural speech processing

Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials

Group‐level brain decoding with deep learning

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Data Processing in Epilepsy Patients with Implanted Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) Devices

Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach

Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data

EECoG-Comp: An Open Source Platform for Concurrent EEG/ECoG Comparisons-Applications to Connectivity Studies