Abstract:Researchers and practitioners have devoted considerable attention to firms' policies regarding discretionary disclosures. Prior studies argue that firms increase demand for their debt and equity issues and, thus, lower their cost of capital, by providing more informative disclosures. However, empirical research has generally not been able to document significant benefits from increased disclosure.This paper proposes an alternative explanation – firms disclose because it is the socially responsible thing to do. We argue that companies have incentives to engage in stakeholder management by undertaking socially responsible activities and that providing extensive and informative disclosures is one such practice.We examine the relationship between firms' disclosures and measures of social responsibility. We use ratings provided by the Council on Economic Priorities as proxies for the degree of social responsibility adopted by the sample firms. Disclosure rankings provided by the annual Association for Investment Management and Research Corporate Information Committee Reports (AIMR Reports) are used to measure disclosure level.Our results indicate that there is a positive relationship between disclosure level and corporate social responsibility. That is, firms that engage in socially responsive activities provide more informative and/or extensive disclosures than do companies that are less focused on advancing social goals. In addition, we find that socially responsible firms are more likely to provide this increased disclosure through better investor relations practices. These results support our contention that increased disclosure is a form of socially responsible behavior.

Institutional Investor Attention and Firm Disclosure

Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital Revisited

Is Investor Attention for Sale? The Role of Advertising in Financial Markets

Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure

Cater to Thy Client: Analyst Responsiveness to Institutional Investor Attention

Institutional Dual-Holders and Corporate Disclosures: A Natural Experiment

Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting

Does Investor Attention Affect Stock Trading and Returns? Evidence from Publicly Listed Firms in China

Corporate Disclosure Quality and Institutional Investors' Holdings During Market Downturns

Does Limited Attention Constrain Investors' Acquisition of Firm-Specific Information?

Institutional investors' limited attention and stock price informativeness in emerging markets: Evidence from China 1

Institutional Investor Attention, Agency Conflicts, and the Cost of Debt

Institutional investor attention and stock market volatility and liquidity: international evidence

Selective Disclosure Associated with Institutional Investors: Evidence Based on Chinese Stock Market

The Effect of Disclosures by Management, Analysts, and Business Press on Cost of Capital, Return Volatility, and Analyst Forecasts: A Study Using Content Analysis

The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Transparency and Information Production

Liquidity, Analysts, and Institutional Ownership

Institutional Investor Attention, Compensation Incentive and Corporate Performance

Institutional investors' attention to environmental information, trading strategies, and market impacts: Evidence from China

The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure