Abstract:This paper investigates the interrelationship between institutional investors' information competition, accounting information transparency, and corporate governance in the context of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2020. Institutional investors are considered informed traders due to their access to valuable information and professional research teams. They play a critical role in reducing information asymmetry between listed companies and investors, influencing investment decisions. Previous research has primarily focused on the impact of institutional investors' shareholding on accounting information transparency, but less attention has been paid to the influence of their information competition. This study addresses this gap by examining the competition among institutional investors to acquire exclusive information and the effect on the transparency of corporate accounting information. The study finds that when information competition is low, institutional investors with larger shareholdings tend to decrease the transparency of financial information to gain a private information advantage. Additionally, the paper explores the mediating factors that influence the quality of management disclosure, which is affected by institutional investors. The research contributes to the understanding of institutional investors' information competition, accounting information transparency, and corporate governance. It reveals that agency cost is a critical linkage factor for institutional investors to influence accounting information transparency to obtain an information competition advantage. It also highlights the impact of stock liquidity and non-Big Four independent audits on the degree of information asymmetry resulting from information competition. Furthermore, the paper suggests that the competitive rivalry between institutional investors determines their tendency to disrupt the market information environment and increase information asymmetry to gain private information advantages. This behavior contradicts the concept of developing institutional investors to foster a healthy and orderly capital market in China. The paper emphasizes the need for regulators to guide and regulate the market behavior of institutional investors.

Liquidity, Analysts, and Institutional Ownership

Disproportional Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity in China

Does Control-Ownership Divergence Impair Market Liquidity in an Emerging Market? Evidence from China

Liquidity Effects of Institutional Investment Horizons

Does Stock Market Liquidity Affect Dividends?

Institutional ownership and liquidity commonality: evidence from Australia

The Effect of Analysts' Reports on Stock Liquidity: The Interaction of Ratings and Qualitative Indicators

The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Transparency and Information Production

Liquidity Preference of Corporate under Asymmetrical Information: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

Ultimate Ownership, Institutional Holdings and Analyst Following

Monitor or manipulator? The effect of institutional ownership on market manipulation

Institutional ownership and analysts' earnings forecasts

Whose money is smart? Individual and institutional investors’ trades based on analyst recommendations

Liquidity Risk and Hedge Fund Ownership

Liquidity Characteristics of Market Anomalies and Institutional Trading

Institutional ownership and insider trading profitability: Evidence from an emerging market

More online interaction, more stock liquidity:--Evidence from Chinese stock exchange online interaction platform

Corporate governance, institutional ownership, and stock liquidity of SMEs: evidence from China

Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?

The Effect of Stock Liquidity on Corporate Risk-Taking

Institutional Investor Information Competition and Accounting Information Transparency: Implications for Financial Markets and Corporate Governance in China