Abstract:Jan Trøst Jørgensen 1 , Edyta M. Urbanska 2 , Jens Mollerup 3 1 Medical Sciences, Dx-Rx Institute, Fredensborg, Denmark; 2 Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3 Pathology Division, Agilent Technologies Denmark ApS, Glostrup, Denmark Comment on: Mazieres J, Paik PK, Garassino MC, et al . Tepotinib Treatment in Patients With MET Exon 14-Skipping Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Long-term Follow-up of the VISION Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023;9:1260-6. Keywords: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); MET exon 14-skipping mutations ( MET ex14); tepotinib; capmatinib; companion diagnostics Submitted Jan 28, 2024. Accepted for publication Mar 29, 2024. Published online Apr 25, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-98 Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with several histological subtypes and a range of known driver molecular alterations. Over the past few decades, the treatment landscape for NSCLC has undergone significant transformation owing to the emergence of targeted therapies related to specific oncogenic drivers such as ALK , BRAF , EGFR , HER2 , KRAS , NTRK , RET , ROS1 , and recently MET exon 14-skipping mutations ( MET ex14) (1). The occurrence of MET ex14 is relatively rare in NSCLC, with a frequency of 2–4% depending on the histological subtype (2,3). The frequency in patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinomas was reported to be 17.4%, in sarcomatoid histology 12%, followed by those with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, with frequencies of 2.4% and 1.3%, respectively. Additionally, patients with NSCLC and MET ex14 tend to be older, with only minor differences with respect to sex or smoking history (2). Mutations leading to MET ex14 typically result in the loss of CBL ubiquitin ligase binding sites on the MET receptor and reduced ubiquitination, allowing for sustained activation of the receptor (4). Different other MET dysregulations, such as gene amplification or fusion, mutations localized in the kinase domain, and protein overexpression, may lead to the oncogenic activation of MET-mediated signaling (1). MET ex14 is prone to emerge in the absence of other oncogenic alterations. However, co-existing mutations in TP53 and MET amplification were identified in 56% and 13.3% of patients, respectively (5). MET amplification has also been recognized as a mechanism for acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with EGFR -mutated NSCLC (6,7). The main objective of this Editorial Commentary was to present and discuss long-term follow-up data for tepotinib, a selective MET inhibitor, in NSCLC patients with MET ex14 mutations from the VISION Phase II clinical trial. The treatment of patients with NSCLC harboring MET ex14 has undergone significant changes in recent years, with the regulatory approval of several selective MET-TKIs. These compounds specifically bind to the intracellular part of the MET receptor and inhibit its kinase activity and downstream signaling pathways (8,9). Initial data were available for crizotinib, where in the PROFILE 1001 study, 18 NSCLC patients with MET ex14 had an objective response rate (ORR) of 44%. Based on this data, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted a breakthrough designation in 2018. More mature data published in 2020 showed though a lower ORR of 32%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.3 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 20.5 months (10). The first approval of a more promising MET-TKI came from Japan in 2020, when tepotinib was approved for the treatment of patients with unresectable, advanced, or recurrent NSCLC with MET ex14 (2). In 2021, a similar approval came from the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2022 (8,11). Tepotinib is not the only selective MET-TKI that has regulatory approval. Capmatinib obtained approval by FDA in 2020, and subsequently by EMA in 2022 (9,12). Savolitinib is another selective MET-TKI that has been approved in China for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with MET ex14 (13). This approval was based on the results of a phase II trial (NCT02897479) in NSCLC patients with MET ex14, who had progressed on or were unable to tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy. The ORR was 49.2% after a median follow-up of 17.6 months, and all responses were partial. Savolitinib showed similar ORR in first line as in later lines, 46.4% versus 40.5%, and a PFS of 6.9 months in both groups, regardless of the treatment line and histologic subtypes such as pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma or other -Abstract Truncated-

Efficacy and safety of tepotinib in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping enrolled in VISION

P2.11-02 Tepotinib in Asian Patients with MET exon 14 Skipping Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Long-term Follow-up From VISION

Tepotinib Treatment in Patients With MET Exon 14–Skipping Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Long‐term experience with tepotinib in Japanese patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC from the Phase II VISION study

Long-term outcomes of tepotinib in patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC from the VISION study.

PPD02.03 Tepotinib in Patients with MET Exon 14 (metex14) Skipping NSCLC: Analysis of All Patients from VISION Cohorts A and C

OA03.05 Tepotinib in Patients with MET Exon 14 (METex14) Skipping NSCLC: Primary Analysis of the Confirmatory VISION Cohort C

Safety of Tepotinib in Patients With MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC and Recommendations for Management

Tepotinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations

Tepotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with high-level MET amplification detected by liquid biopsy: VISION Cohort B

MET targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET exon 14-skipping mutations

Abstract CT538: Tepotinib + Gefitinib in Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with MET Amplification: Final Analysis of INSIGHT

PPD02.02 Tepotinib + Gefitinib in Patients with EGFR-Mutant NSCLC with MET Amplification (metamp): Final Analysis of INSIGHT

Case report: Response to tepotinib in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring METex14 skipping with varying features

Abstract CT193: Tepotinib + gefitinib vs chemotherapy in<i>MET-</i>amplified EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Predefined subgroup analysis of a Phase Ib/II study

Spatial profiling of METex14-altered NSCLC under tepotinib treatment: Shifting the immunosuppressive landscape

Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Subgroup Analysis of Savolitinib in Chinese Patients with NSCLCs Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Alterations

Randomised Phase 1b/2 Trial of Tepotinib Vs Sorafenib in Asian Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with MET Overexpression

Abstract CT031: Preliminary Efficacy and Safety Results of Savolitinib Treating Patients with Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma (PSC) and Other Types of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboringmetexon 14 Skipping Mutations

OA14 Phase 2 Study: Tepotinib + Gefitinib in MET+/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Egfr)-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Phase II Study of Savolitinib in Patients (pts) with Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma (PSC) and Other Types of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations (Metex14+).