Long-term outcomes of tepotinib in patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC from the VISION study.

Paul K. Paik,Marina Chiara Garassino,Xiuning Le,Michael Thomas,Hiroshi Sakai,Remi Veillon,Egbert F. Smit,Julien Mazieres,Alexis B Cortot,Jo Raskin,Santiago Viteri,James Chih-Hsin Yang,Myung-Ju Ahn,Yi-Long Wu,Jun Zhao,Svenja Adrian,Karin Berghoff,Rolf Bruns,Andreas Johne,Enriqueta Felip
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.9060
IF: 45.3
2023-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:9060 Background: Tepotinib is a highly selective MET inhibitor with clinical activity in patients (pts) with MET exon 14 ( METex14) skipping NSCLC. We previously reported robust and durable activity of tepotinib from the Phase II VISION study (NCT02864992; data cut: Feb 20, 2022; median follow-up: 26.1 months [mos]; Thomas, et al. WCLC 2022). Here, we report long-term outcomes from VISION, fulfilling an FDA post-market requirement (data cut: Nov 20, 2022; follow-up: Cohort A [primary cohort] ≥35 mos, Cohort C [confirmatory cohort] ≥18 mos). Methods: Pts with advanced METex14 skipping NSCLC detected by liquid and/or tissue (T+) biopsy received tepotinib 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response by independent review using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 313 pts enrolled, median age was 72 years (range 41–94) and pts received tepotinib for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 11.5 mos (11.6); median follow-up was 32.6 mos (range 0.3–71.9). First line (1L) pts (n=164; median age: 74 years [range 47–94]; male: 50.6%; ECOG PS 1: 72.0%; smoking history: 53.7%) received tepotinib for a mean (SD) of 12.4 mos (12.2), with 27 pts still receiving treatment. ORR was 57.3% (95% CI: 49.4, 65.0), mDOR was 46.4 mos (13.8, not estimable [ne]), mPFS was 12.6 mos (9.7, 17.7), and mOS was 21.3 mos (14.2, 25.9). Among 111 1L T+ pts, ORR was 58.6% (48.8, 67.8), mDOR was 46.4 mos (15.2, ne), mPFS was 15.9 mos (11.0, 49.7), and mOS was 29.7 mos (18.8, ne) (Table). Second-or-later line (2L+) pts (n=149; median age: 71 years [range 41–89]; male: 47.7%; ECOG PS 1: 75.8%; smoking history: 40.9%) received tepotinib for a mean (SD) of 10.5 mos (11.0), with 10 pts still receiving treatment. ORR was 45.0% (36.8, 53.3) and mDOR was 12.6 mos (9.5, 18.5). Across all 313 pts, ORR was 51.4% (45.8, 57.1), mDOR was 18.0 mos (12.4, 46.4), mPFS was 11.2 mos (9.5, 13.8), and mOS was 19.6 mos (16.2, 22.9). No new safety concerns were observed. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 34.8% of pts; 14.7% of pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. Any grade related peripheral edema occurred in 67.1% of pts (Grade ≥3: 11.2%). Conclusions: The long-term outcomes of VISION demonstrate the robust and durable clinical activity of tepotinib, particularly in 1L T+ pts, and manageable safety profile, further defining its use in clinical practice. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992 . [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?