Abstract:Purpose Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kVCBCT)‐guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART) uses daily deformed CT (dCT), which is generated automatically through deformable registration methods. These registration methods may perform poorly in reproducing volumes of the target organ, rectum, and bladder during treatment. We analyzed the registration errors between the daily kVCBCTs and corresponding dCTs for these organs using the default optical flow algorithm and two registration procedures. We validated the effectiveness of these registration methods in replicating the geometry for dose calculation on kVCBCT for ART. Methods We evaluated three deformable image registration (DIR) methods to assess their registration accuracy and dose calculation effeciency in mapping target and critical organs. The DIR methods include (1) default intensity‐based deformable registration, (2) hybrid deformable registration, and (3) a two‐step deformable registration process. Each technique was applied to a computerized imaging reference system (CIRS) phantom (Model 062 M) and to five patients who received volumetric modulated arc therapy to the prostate. Registration accuracy was assessed using the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and each method was compared with the intensity‐based registration method. The improvement in the dCT image quality of the CIRS phantom and five patients was assessed by comparing dCT with kVCBCT. Image quality quantitative metrics for the phantom included the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), uniformity, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), whereas those for the patients included the mean absolute error (MAE), mean error, peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To determine dose metric differences, we used a dose‐volume histogram (DVH) and 3.0%/0.3 mm gamma analysis to compare planning computed tomography (pCT) and kVCBCT recalculations with restimulated CT images used as a reference. Results The dCT images generated by the hybrid (dCTH) and two‐step (dCTC) registration methods resulted in significant improvements compared to kVCBCT in the phantom model. Specifically, the SNR improved by 107% and 107.2%, the uniformity improved by 90% and 75%, and the CNR improved by 212.2% and 225.6 for dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the patient images, the MAEs improved by 98% and 94%, the PSNRs improved by 16.3% and 22.9%, and the SSIMs improved by 1% and 1% in the dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the geometric evaluation, only the two‐step registration method improved registration accuracy. The dCTH method yielded an average HD95 of 12 mm and average DSC of 0.73, whereas dCTC yielded an average HD95 of 2.9 mm and average DSC of 0.902. The DVH showed that the dCTC‐based dose calculations differed by 95% at all points, whereas they were <95% for kVCBCT‐based treatment plans. Conclusion The two‐step registration method outperforms the intensity‐based and hybrid registration methods. While the hybrid and two‐step‐based methods improved the image quality of kVCBCT in a linear accelerator, only the two‐step method improved the registration accuracy of the corresponding structures among the pCT and kVCBCT datasets. A two‐step registration process is recommended for applying kVCBCT to ART, which achieves better registration accuracy for local and global image structures. This method appears to be beneficial for radiotherapy dose calculation in patients with pelvic cancer.

Comparison of translation algorithms in determining maximum allowable CTV shifts for Real‐Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) robustness evaluation in prostate cancers

Postoperative Radiotherapy For Glioma: Improved Delineation Of The Clinical Target Volume Using The Geodesic Distance Calculation

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Hypofractionated Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Dose Delivery Uncertainty Due to Interfractional Motion.

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Investigation of intra-fractionated range guided adaptive proton therapy (RGAPT): (Part II) range-shift compensated on-line treatment adaptation and verification

A novel approach for evaluation of prostate deformation and associated dosimetric implications in IGRT of the prostate.

A "rolling average" multiple adaptive planning method to compensate for target volume changes in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Evaluation of the geometric and dosimetric accuracies of deformable image registration of targets and critical organs in prostate CBCT‐guided adaptive radiotherapy

Real-time image-guided treatment of mobile tumors in proton therapy by a library of treatment plans: a simulation study

SU-FF-T-374: Robustness of Proton Versus IMRT Treatment Plans in the Presence of Target Motion for Prostate Cancers

Feasibility of proton dosimetry overriding planning CT with daily CBCT elaborated through generative artificial intelligence tools

A treatment-site-specific evaluation of commercial synthetic computed tomography solutions for proton therapy

Verification of surface‐guided radiation therapy (SGRT) alignment for proton breast and chest wall patients by comparison to CT‐on‐rails and kV‐2D alignment

Clinical implementation of real time motion management for prostate SBRT: A radiation therapist's perspective

Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study

Urethral Interfractional Geometric and Dosimetric Variations of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Study Using an Onboard MRI

Evaluating the impact of possible interobserver variability in CBCT-based soft-tissue matching using TCP/NTCP models for prostate cancer radiotherapy

Simulating an intra-fraction adaptive workflow to enable PTV margin reduction in MRIgART volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate SBRT

Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes

Evaluation of dose delivery based on deformed CT using a commercial software for lung cancer