Marketization, Performative Environments, and the Impact of Organizational Climate on Teaching Practice in Business Schools

S. Page,L. Vos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2018.0173

2020-04-20

Abstract:Marketization of higher education has emerged as a global trend in many countries, and in the UK, students are now paying among the highest tuition fees globally. Marketization is synonymous with p...

Education,Political Science,Business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The marketization of education

Trevor Cotterill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563718-4

2017-08-23

Abstract:This chapter explores the process of marketization or 'quasi-marketization'. It describes the notion of choice for individuals within education. The chapter explains the debate surrounding accountability within a market economy. Much has been written about the marketization of Higher Education in England, with the emphasis on student choice of university. The chapter examines market forces within the wider sector of education. This marketization, or rather 'quasi-marketization', of education refers to privatization of the education industry in the process of providing educative services. Economic advantage is the main driving force for the emergence of this style of education. As economic globalization takes hold across the world, there is an increase in economic competition, resulting in instability, high unemployment rates, heavy pressure on public expenditures and a continuous pursuit of competitiveness. Market accountability has sought to make available a range of information by which consumers (parents) could hold English schools accountable.
Commercialization of American Universities and Its Enlightenment

MEI Wei-hui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1981.2007.03.025

2007-01-01

Abstract:Commercialization has become a common phenomenon of American universities.With the introduc-tion of the mechanism of SWOT analysis,this paper firstly discusses the reasons why commercialization e-merges.Then,four main forms of commercialization,namely athletics,scientific research,education and curriculum are analyzed to conclude that commercialization brings both benefits and costs to universities.U-niversities should make clear what its core spirit is and at the same time serve the society well.
Consumerisation in UK higher education business schools: higher fees, greater stress and debatable outcomes

Abdul Jabbar,Bejan Analoui,Kai Kong,Mohammed Mirza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0196-z

2017-10-04

Higher Education

Abstract:For many UK higher education business schools, the continued recruitment of UK, EU and international students is crucial for financial stability, viability and independence. Due to increasingly competitive funding models across the sector, many institutional leaders and administrators are making decisions typical of highly marketised consumer environments. Thus, this paper explores academics’ perceptions of the impact of consumerisation in UK higher education business schools. To achieve this, 22 business school academics were interviewed within three UK higher education institutions (HEIs) in the North of England. Participants had a minimum of three years teaching experience. Data was analysed using template analysis taking an interpretive approach. The findings indicate that academics perceived the introduction of tuition fees to have been the catalyst for students increasing demonstration of customer-like behaviour: viewing the education process as transactional, with the HEI providing a ‘paid for’ service. It is argued that these changes in UK higher education have created tensions between university leaders and academics, creating genuine dilemmas for those with decision-making responsibilities who must balance academic integrity and long-term institutional financial viability.

education & educational research
Managing the student experience in English higher education: Differing responses to market pressures

Paul A. Temple,Claire Callender,Lyn Grove,Natasha Kersh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/lre.14.1.05

2016-04-18

London Review of Education

Abstract:This paper reports on recent research aimed at assessing how the management of the undergraduate student experience in English higher education is changing in the light of the new tuition fee regime introduced in 2012, as well as other government policies aimed at creating market-type pressures within the higher education sector. A distinction was observed between the research-intensive universities studied – defined here as institutions where research income comprised 20 per cent or more of total turnover, with correspondingly strong positions in published research-based rankings – and universities largely dependent on income from teaching, with weaker market positions. Broadly speaking, the latter group were responding to market pressures by centralizing services, standardizing procedures, and strengthening management controls over teaching processes. The research-intensive universities tended to work within existing institutional cultures to respond to students' needs. Organizational change here usually took the form of creating more coherent functional groupings of student services, rather than comprehensive reorganizations. It appears to us that these different responses to a changed environment point to the creation of two distinct English university types, one strongly managerial with 'student as customer' orientations, and a smaller group with less centralized, more collegial cultures.
Impacts of Marketization Environments on Universities' Behaviors and the Universities' Coping Strategies

YAN Feng-qiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2005.03.014

2005-01-01

Abstract:Universities are obsessed by tensions between temptations from marketization environments and safeguarding role of academic values. If universities want to play an axial role in the new economy, they have to cope with the tensions successfully. The author analyzes the costs and benefits of market behaviors in universities by reviewing American research universities. The internal and external mechanisms are analyzed, which regulate the for-profit behaviors of universities. Based on above phenomena, the author discusses characteristics of higher education market by comparing elite and mass higher education institutions, non-profit and for-profit institutions. Finally, four strategies are summarized which can be adopted to cope with the marketization environments.
American higher education system: consumerism versus professorialism

Steve O. Michael

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549710164014

1997-06-01

International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract:Suggests that institutions of higher education in the USA encounter problems that are unique to the market environment. These problems include competition for resources, escalating costs, and resource constraints. In response to these problems, higher education systems within this kind of environment tend to borrow strategies from organizations operating under the most competitive environment ‐ the business sector. Discusses specific strategies adopted by institutions of higher education in North America. Examines how these strategies have affected the culture of higher education. Discusses the shift occurring between the consumerism‐ professorialism continuum. Calls for the need to understand the dual nature of higher education so that strategies can be selectively adapted.
Marketisation of Higher Education: Trends, Issues and Prospects

Motohisa KANEKO,LIU Wen-jun,ZHONG Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2006.03.002

2006-01-01

Abstract:How are the growing influence of market forces changing the shape of higher education? What are the backgrounds, prospects and consequences of the marketisation of higher education? These are the questions that higher education research has to respond to. This paper first presents a brief review of the relationship between the state and market in the history of higher education, then proposes a framework to categorise and analyse the market forces in higher education and releated major issues.
Higher Education’s Marketization Impact on EFL Instructor Moral Stress, Identity, and Agency

Timothy Scott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n1p99

2020-12-25

English Language Teaching

Abstract:Higher educational institutions (HEIs) have experienced a dramatic reconceptualization as academia strives to align its organizational design and civic mission with the societal notion that education is obliged to prioritize quantifiable results. The traditionalistic ethos that knowledge is acquired through reason and the pursuit of critical inquiry has been supplanted by a marketized ideology that education is a transactional process. The latter notion fails to foster the development of students’ core competencies. The resulting commodification of education has repurposed HEIs from serving a public good to serving a private good and has impacted institutional policies, program offerings, curriculum design, pedagogy, and instructor and student assessment. English foreign language (EFL) programs face immense pressure to conform to external idealized beliefs concerning appropriate course design and implementation. Such pressure limits instructors’ ability to perform their tasks efficiently. The burden of cultural and institutional constraints and unmanageable expectations has led to myriads of professional and moral stresses that negatively affect EFL instructors’ identity and agency in their occupation. This article explores the marketization of universities and its subsequent impact on EFL instructors. Demands from various stakeholders create moral stress for instructors; influence instructor identity through shaping the perceived, actual, and external ought self; and produce damaging consequences related to diminished instructor agency in the classroom.
Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education

Ben Williamson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556

2020-03-11

Critical Studies in Education

Abstract:'Platform capitalism' and 'surveillance capitalism' describe the new business model and market form of the web. These forms of digital capitalism have begun to infuse the higher education landscape by merging with existing political demands for universities to become more data-driven, competitive, and market-focused. This article presents a case study of the education business Pearson and its expansion of the digital platform as a model for global higher education reform. A key 'edu-business' in the 'global education industry', Pearson has pivoted to online program management platforms, on-demand digital learning platforms, and intensive mobilization of data analytics to enact its strategic business priorities. These developments position Pearson as an authoritative source for both the evaluation and valuation of HE as a market. The analysis foregrounds the micro-processes involved as Pearson has sought to make, exploit, and maintain market opportunities in HE, demonstrating how the market form of digital capitalism is being reproduced by commercial power-players in the global higher education industry. As an actor in the sociotechnical arrangement of markets, the digital platform is a key participant in HE reforms that are intended to align the public mission of universities with the private interests of digital capitalism.

education & educational research
Student performativity in higher education: converting learning as a private space into a public performance

Bruce Macfarlane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.956697

2014-10-07

Abstract:The paper sets out a conceptual analysis of student performativity in higher education as a mirror image of teacher performativity. The latter is well known and refers to targets, evaluations and performance indicators connected with the measurement of the teaching and research quality of university academics. The former is defined as the way that students are evaluated on the basis of how they perform at university in bodily, dispositional and emotional terms. Specifically, this includes rules on class attendance and assessment (‘presenteeism’), an increasing emphasis on participation in class and in groups as part of learning and assessment regimes (‘learnerism’) and the surveillance of students’ emotional development and values (‘soulcraft’). Student performativity is symbolic of the ‘performing self’ in wider society and is transforming learning at university from a private space into a public performance. This negatively impacts student rights to be free to learn as autonomous adults.

education & educational research
Discursive framings of market-based education policy and their negotiation by students: the case of ‘value for money’ in English universities

Steven Jones,Katy Vigurs,Diane Harris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1708711

2020-01-26

Oxford Review of Education

Abstract:Measures that economise education are typically accompanied by discourses that prime society for change by framing the policy in individualistic and consumeristic terms. This article explores the emergence of 'value for money' (VfM) discourses in the English higher education sector. Using Bourdieu's thinking tools, we explore how VfM is conceptualised by final year undergraduates paying different levels of 'headline' tuition fees at a Russell Group and a Post-92 university. Unsurprisingly, we find qualitative evidence of an increase in VfM negativity as fees rise. However, this does not distribute evenly across different groups of students. At both institutions, undergraduates approach VfM in complex and unexpected ways, drawing on different capitals and often pushing back against dominant discourses. A key finding is that many students report high levels of satisfaction with their institution, course and teaching, while simultaneously expressing VfM negativity because they feel tuition fees are too high.

education & educational research
The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education

Simon Marginson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.747109

2013-05-01

Journal of Education Policy

Abstract:For more than two decades, governments around the world, led by the English-speaking polities, have moved higher education systems closer to the forms of textbook economic markets. Reforms include corporatisation, competitive funding, student charges, output formats and performance reporting. But, no country has established a bona fide economic market in the first-degree education of domestic students. No research university is driven by shareholders, profit, market share, allocative efficiency or the commodity form. There is commercial tuition only in parts of vocational training and international education. While intensified competition, entrepreneurship and consumer talk are pervasive in higher education, capitalism is not very important. At the most, there are regulated quasi-markets, as in post-Browne UK. This differs from the experience of privatisation and commercialisation of transport, communications, broadcasting and health insurance in many nations. The article argues that bona fide market reform in higher education is constrained by intrinsic limits specific to the sector (public goods, status competition), and political factors associated with those limits. This suggests that market reform is utopian, and the abstract ideal is sustained for exogenous policy reasons (e.g. fiscal reduction, state control, ordering of contents). But, if capitalist markets are clearly unachievable, a more authentic modernisation agenda is needed.

education & educational research
The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good

Rajani Naidoo,Joanna Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.939098

2014-07-24

Critical Studies in Education

Abstract:The restructuring of higher education (HE) according to neoliberal market principles has constructed the student consumer as a social category, thereby altering the nature, purpose and values of HE. In England, a key government attempt to champion the rights of the student consumer has taken the form of institutional charters which indicate the level of services students can expect to receive and what they will be expected to do in return. Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual framework is applied to analyse the dynamics of practice in the context of the intensification of marketisation in English universities. The impact on student identities and learning processes, on the curriculum and on the academic practices of faculty is explored. By studying the production of institutional information related to charters, a particular image of the ‘good’ student is promoted to prospective students, which simultaneously regulates current student expectations. We argue that the marketisation of learning may result in passive and instrumental learners, a reduction in the range of disciplinary knowledge and a deterrence of innovation in teaching practices, all of which impact on the public good functions of universities.

education & educational research
A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior

James M. Sinkula,William E. Baker,Thomas Noordewier,J. M. Sinkula,W. E. Baker,T. Noordewier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003

IF: 18.2

1997-09-01

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Abstract:The authors review the concept of organizational learning and present a broad conceptual framework for its modeling. Within this framework, one specific process for market-based organizational learning is postulated. An empirical test of this model leads the authors to conclude that a more positive learning orientation (a value-based construct) will directly result in increased market information generation and dissemination (knowledge-based constructs), which, in turn, directly affects the degree to which an organization makes changes in its marketing strategies (a behavioral construct). Managerial implications are discussed.

business
Organizational responses to the marketization of higher education institutions: a comparative case study of South Korea and Hong Kong

Sue-Yeon Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1775550

IF: 1.478

2020-06-23

Asia Pacific Journal of Education

Abstract:The purpose of this study is to investigate the organizational changes in higher education institutions across different regional contexts, with a special focus on the trends towards marketization in South Korea and Hong Kong. The study employs a qualitative case study approach to understand the organizational responses to the marketization from the selected research sites. Using data collected through semi-structured interviews with participants from each case, the study applies cross-case synthesis to evaluate similarities and differences related to organizational changes and management practices at universities in these two contexts in Asia. The findings underscore two principal themes: market influences and trends towards marketization, and organizational and management changes on campuses. The findings suggest that both South Korea and Hong Kong represent excellent cases through which to explore organizational responses to the marketization of higher education institutions and to highlight the reshaping of higher education in Asia.

education & educational research
Marketing higher education: the MBA experience

John Nicholls,John Harris,Eleanor Morgan,Ken Clarke,David Sims

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549510082369

1995-04-01

International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract:Given the increasing competition in higher education, including that on MBA degrees, it is surprising that more attention has not been paid to marketing issues, such as are educational institutions really “customer‐oriented”?; do they choose the most appropriate market segments?; the complexities of the decision processes of the “buyers”. Looks first at general issues facing educational marketers, and then examines the marketing of MBA degrees in the light of theory, of previous survey data and of evidence arising from their collective experience. Concludes that, whether the “customer” is an individual student or a company, a greater understanding of buyer behaviour is needed; business schools should improve their marketing or stand accused of not practising what they preach.

English Else
Tipping point: The staff wellbeing crisis in higher education

Michelle Jayman,Jonathan Glazzard,Anthea Rose

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.929335

2022-08-13

Frontiers in Education

Abstract:This marketised higher education environment in the UK has had dire consequences for academics at all levels. Literature suggests that academics are busier and working faster than ever. There is evidence of an undermining of academic professionalism, academic freedom and increased job insecurity in the sector. It is not possible for academics to position themselves outside of the performance culture and still be viewed as a valued team member. Within this paper, our concerns relate specifically to the impact of this culture of performativity on the wellbeing of staff who work in UK higher education institutions.
The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity

Martin Parker,David Jary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849522013

1995-05-01

Organization

Abstract:This paper uses elements of Weberian and Foucauldian social theory to speculate on the consequences of recent higher education change in the UK. We argue that changes in the political, institutional and funding environment have produced forms of HE organization that increase the power of management and diminish the autonomy of professional academics. These new forms of organization, which are increasingly bureaucratic and utilize sophisticated systems of surveillance, will make academics increasingly instrumental in their attitudes and behaviour. We conclude that the rationalization of HE should be resisted, but that nostalgia for a previous order should not be part of that resistance. `Mass' higher education organizations are not simply good or bad, but their rationale and consequences need to be clearly thought through if their negative aspects are to be addressed.

management
Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism

Mark Olssen *,Michael A. Peters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718

2005-01-01

Journal of Education Policy

Abstract:The ascendancy of neoliberalism and the associated discourses of ‘new public management’, during the 1980s and 1990s has produced a fundamental shift in the way universities and other institutions of higher education have defined and justified their institutional existence. The traditional professional culture of open intellectual enquiry and debate has been replaced with a institutional stress on performativity, as evidenced by the emergence of an emphasis on measured outputs: on strategic planning, performance indicators, quality assurance measures and academic audits. This paper traces the links between neoliberalism and globalization on the one hand, and neoliberalism and the knowledge economy on the other. It maintains that in a global neoliberal environment, the role of higher education for the economy is seen by governments as having greater importance to the extent that higher education has become the new star ship in the policy fleet for governments around the world. Universities are seen as a key driver in the knowledge economy and as a consequence higher education institutions have been encouraged to develop links with industry and business in a series of new venture partnerships. The recognition of economic importance of higher education and the necessity for economic viability has seen initiatives to promote greater entrepreneurial skills as well as the development of new performative measures to enhance output and to establish and achieve targets. This paper attempts to document these trends at the level of both political philosophy and economic theory.

education & educational research
Markets in Education: A Theoretical Note

Simon Marginson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419503900306

1995-11-01

Australian Journal of Education

Abstract:The development of market relations is a striking feature of education in Australia and comparable countries. Education continues to produce non-market outputs (‘use values’) as well as market outputs, but participation in schooling is being reworked as market consumption; schools, TAFE institutions and universities are now required to sell themselves, and a range of services is provided on full cost basis. This article re-theorises markets in education, drawing on political economy and social theory (including the literature on post-modernism). It defines educational markets and describe four types of commodity produced: positional goods, self goods, training goods and knowledge goods. Post-compulsory education's long-standing role, as a vast competition for scarce social position, constitutes a form of market (one ordered by both government and private interests), and is the platform on which more orthodox economic markets in training and knowledge goods are being erected.

education & educational research

Marketization, Performative Environments, and the Impact of Organizational Climate on Teaching Practice in Business Schools

The marketization of education

Commercialization of American Universities and Its Enlightenment

Consumerisation in UK higher education business schools: higher fees, greater stress and debatable outcomes

Managing the student experience in English higher education: Differing responses to market pressures

Impacts of Marketization Environments on Universities' Behaviors and the Universities' Coping Strategies

American higher education system: consumerism versus professorialism

Marketisation of Higher Education: Trends, Issues and Prospects

Higher Education’s Marketization Impact on EFL Instructor Moral Stress, Identity, and Agency

Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education

Student performativity in higher education: converting learning as a private space into a public performance

Discursive framings of market-based education policy and their negotiation by students: the case of ‘value for money’ in English universities

The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education

The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good

A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior

Organizational responses to the marketization of higher education institutions: a comparative case study of South Korea and Hong Kong

Marketing higher education: the MBA experience

Tipping point: The staff wellbeing crisis in higher education

The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity

Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism

Markets in Education: A Theoretical Note