Abstract:How students react to and use feedback is an important element of their higher education experience. Within the constraints of mass higher education, effective feedback processes are, however, difficult to manage. The aim of this longitudinal qualitative inquiry is to investigate through repeated interviews and related documentary analysis how four case study learners experienced feedback processes over the duration of their undergraduate studies. The analysis is guided by a social constructivist perspective on feedback research. The findings highlight students' development of more sophisticated orientations to feedback over time; how they experienced and used feedback over the shorter and longer term; their varied affective responses; and how their perspectives evolved. The novel aspects of the findings lie in detailing the individual nature of students' responses to feedback and documenting the different ways these changed during their undergraduate studies. The role of grades and projected honours classification was a significant element of the performative nature of the students' experience, and impacted on the extent to which they engaged with feedback. Students often felt that there were dissonances between feedback that teachers were providing and what would be useful or palatable to them. The implications propose that the concept of students as partners can support the reframing of feedback processes as a partnership between students and teachers. Partnership approaches resonate with the need for social constructivist approaches to feedback where knowledge and understanding are co-constructed. Feedback partnerships also carry potential to enable the mutual development of staff and student feedback literacy.

Student performativity in higher education: converting learning as a private space into a public performance

The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity

Perform or else: the performative enhancement of teacher professionalism

Conceptualizing Gender Performance in Higher Education: Exploring Regulation of Identity Expression

Performance management in the Australian higher education system – A historically informed critique

Student Subjectivity in the Marketised University

The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity

Professionalism and competing responsibilities: moderating competitive performativity in school autonomy reform

Committed to learn: student engagement and care in higher education

The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good

Rendering the paradoxes and pleasures of academic life: using images, poetry and drama to speak back to the measured university

Legitimation, professionalisation and accountability in higher education studies: an intergenerational story

Revisiting Higher Education Business Models and Academic Performance Metrics Times

Marketization, Performative Environments, and the Impact of Organizational Climate on Teaching Practice in Business Schools

ENTERING THE LIVE-STREAMING VOID AND EMERGING VICTORIOUS: TEACHING PERFORMANCE PSYCHOLOGY UNDER PRESSURE

Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships

Tipping point: The staff wellbeing crisis in higher education

“She’s Pretty in Her Pictures but in Real Life She’s Ugly”: School Pupils Negotiating the Blurred Boundaries between Online and Offline Social Contexts

Re/imagining higher education pedagogies: gender, emotion and difference

Tactical evaluations: Everyday neoliberalism in academia

Performing English, Performing Bodies: A Case for Critical Performative Language Pedagogy