Abstract:To the Editor: Placenta previa is one of the main causes of bleeding in late pregnancy and childbirth. According to the relationship between the lower edge of the placenta and the internal cervix, placenta previa can be classified as incomplete placenta previa (IPP) and complete placenta previa (CPP). IPP indicates that the lower edge of the placenta reaches but does not exceed the internal cervix. CPP refers the lower edge of the placenta covering and exceeding the internal cervix. This common classification standard is applicable to cases in which the myometrium is intact and only the placenta is prepositioned. However, when a pregnant woman who has previously delivered by cesarean section presents with placenta previa in the current pregnancy, and the placenta is attached to the uterine scar, there are significant increases in the risks for post-delivery bleeding and various complications. These cases have been given a new name, pernicious placenta previa (PPP).[1] Women with placenta previa are at an approximately ten-fold increased risk of antepartum vaginal bleeding. The only safe and appropriate mode of delivery for placenta previa is cesarean delivery.[2] Moreover, if the placenta previa is combined with placenta accreta, because the pathogenesis of both is related to endometrial damage, the risk of obstetric bleeding is greatly increased. Placenta accreta indicates the invasion of chorionic villi into the maternal myometrium due to developmental defects of the decidua. Placenta accreta is a general term, which is classified into three progressive states based on the depth of myometrial invasion: accreta, increta, and percreta. As the placenta invades deeper into the myometrium, peripartum hemorrhage can become more severe. In the case of placenta previa combined with accreta, complications include disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiorgan failure, the need for additional surgery including hysterectomy, thromboembolism, and even death.[3] One of the most important modifiers of the clinical outcome is prenatal diagnosis.[4] Several studies confirm decreased hemorrhage and other maternal complications in cases diagnosed antenatally rather than intrapartum because prenatal diagnosis and pre-estimation of blood loss allow for optimal management, which typically includes delivery in “centers of excellence” for high risk pregnant women, use of a well-equipped blood bank with ample blood products, team training of the surgery team, and planned cesarean hysterectomy.[5] This study aimed to conduct a pre-operative assessment of potential blood loss during operation for patients with various types of placenta previa with or without different degrees of placenta accreta. This knowledge is important for pre-delivery preparation and optimal management choices for obstetricians and patients. A retrospective analysis of a total of 81 patients with placenta previa was conducted in the study (IPP, 15; CPP, 35; and PPP, 31). Cesarean section blood loss was analyzed for each group. In the cases of hysterectomy, sonographic characteristics and similarities of the placenta were analyzed and summarized. SPSS21.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used. The measurement data were analyzed by t tests and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Nonnormally distributed data were evaluated by the rank sum test. Count data were analyzed by the Chi-square test. A value of P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Here, we showed that cesarean section blood loss was highest in the PPP group, followed sequentially by the CPP and IPP groups (2166 ± 35 mL vs. 726 ± 38 mL vs. 630 ± 45 mL, P < 0.05). Only placenta accreta occurred in the IPP and CPP groups; no cases of placenta increta nor percreta were identified in these groups. Cesarean section blood loss was significantly higher in cases of placenta previa combined with placenta accreta than in those without this combination of placental abnormalities (IPP, 750 ± 46 mL vs. 444 ± 42 mL, P < 0.05; CPP, 734 ± 39 mL vs. 600 ± 36 mL, P < 0.05). In the PPP group, all three types of placenta accreta (accreta, increta, and percreta) were identified. Cesarean section blood loss was highest in cases with placenta percreta and increta, and there was no significant difference between these two subgroups (3500 ± 62 mL vs. 3443 ± 68 mL, P > 0.05). The amount of blood loss was 2487 ± 56 mL in cases of PPP with placenta accreta (P < 0.05). The amount of blood loss was lowest in the PPP group without placenta accreta (946 ± 53 mL, P < 0.05). Next, we investigated the incidence of the three placenta previa types combined with placenta accreta. No significant difference was found in the incidence of IPP and CPP (40% vs. 34%, P > 0.05). The incidence of PPP combined with placenta accreta (including accreta, increta, and percreta) was highest (55%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, placental characteristics of hysterectomy patients were summarized. Nine patients underwent a hysterectomy. All of them were in the PPP with placenta accreta group; seven had placenta increta, and two had placenta accreta. The average blood loss was 4500 ± 69 mL. The sonographic commonalities and characteristics of the placenta were as follows: the main part of the placenta was attached to the lower part of the uterus; the uterine wall was thin where the placenta adhered (<1 mm); abundant sinusoids in the placenta and a loss of retroplacental clear space were evident; and the vortex-type blood flow signal was identified in the posterior space of the placenta [Figure 1].Figure 1: Sonogram of a patient with PPP combined with increta, who had blood loss of 5000 mL (A). Sonogram of a patient with PPP combined with percreta, who had blood loss of 4300 mL (B). PPP: Pernicious placenta previa.Overall, our study demonstrated that PPP exhibits the highest incidence of combination with placenta accreta. Among this group, PPP with placenta increta or percreta caused the greatest blood loss during cesarean section and highly likely led to hysterectomy. Therefore, prenatal ultrasound diagnosis is very important. If dangerous sonographic signs of the placenta are observed by sonographers, the clinical team should be immediately warned. In addition to the above routine preparation, more active plans should be implemented. Effective management involves reducing complications, saving the mother's life, and improving the prognosis. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Qin Li and Ye-Qing Jiang for their assistance with sonography. Funding This work is supported by the Key Special Projects of National Key R & D Plan (No. 2020YFC2005100). Conflicts of interest None.

Placental histopathology lesions and pregnancy outcome in pregnancies complicated with symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic placenta previa

[Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Pernicious Placenta Previa].

Prevalence of Antepartum Hemorrhage in Women with Placenta Previa: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Pregnant Women with Placenta Previa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Placenta previa: risk factors, maternal and perinatal outcomes

Severe Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Placenta Previa and Prior Cesarean Delivery

Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa

Prevalence and association of placental lesions with obstetrical features and outcome: data from French prospective study

Severe outcomes and strategies for the prediction and treatment in pregnancies with pernicious placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery -- a national retrospective study

Effect of Previous Placenta Previa on Outcome of Next Pregnancy: a 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

A Multicenter, Retrospective Comparison Study of Pregnancy Outcomes According to Placental Location in Placenta Previa

A comprehensive analysis of the association between placental pathology and recurrent preterm birth

Placenta Previa: Does Its Type Affect Pregnancy Outcome?

Relationship Between Placental Pathology and Neonatal Outcomes.

MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS WITH PLACENTA PREVIA

[A Retrospective Analysis on the Pernicious Placenta Previa from 2008 to 2014].

The Pregnancy Outcome and the High Risk Factor of Postpartum Hemorrhage in PPP Patients

Risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: a retrospective cohort study

The bleeding mother and her baby: a study to determine the fetomaternal outcome in cases of placenta previa

Correlation of Placenta Previa Type with Cesarean Section Blood Loss and Predictors of Hysterectomy

Prospective observational study of risk factors and maternofetal outcome of placenta previa at LMICs