Abstract:Empirical How does corporate governance affect a manager's intention to promote corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Is the relationship between financial transparency and CSR activities affected by the business group affiliation and ownership structure of firms? CSR ratings are negatively correlated with the level of earnings management when all firms are considered. However, the relationship is weaker for chaebol firms and firms with highly concentrated ownership, which suggests that CSR practices can be abusively used by those firms to conceal their poor earnings quality. The adverse use of CSR is discouraged if the fraction of shares owned by institutional investors is high. However, no evidence is found for a similar moderating effect for foreign investors. This study suggests that the business group affiliation and the ownership structure of a firm are important factors in determining the managerial incentives to engage in CSR, which can explain the mixed results reported in previous research. In addition, the possibility of a simultaneous relationship between CSR and other key firm characteristics, such as earnings quality, should be considered when conducting research on CSR. This study provides the insight to investors and other stakeholders that the managerial incentives behind CSR activities can differ depending on a firm's characteristics. Care must be taken when assessing the CSR activities, in particular, of firms with weak corporate governance. For policy makers, it is important to ensure that CSR‐related disclosures by firms are based on actual plans and are not intended to deceive stakeholders, especially when the firms are not actively monitored by external shareholders.

The value of corporate social responsibility: evidence from the humidifier disinfectant scandal in Korea

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The impact of the MSCI ESG Ratings on Korean Firms

Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea

Do firms manage corporate social responsibility strategically?: Evidence from ESG ratings of Korean firms

Which Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Affects the Cost of Equity? Evidence from Korea

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Do Higher-Rated or Enhancing ESG of Firms Enhance Their Long–Term Sustainability? Evidence from Market Returns in Korea

Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from Korea

The impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate value

One in the Same? Unpacking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and ESG in South Korea

ESG and Firm Risk: Evidence in Korea

The Impact of Firms' Environmental, Social, and Governancial Factors for Sustainability on Their Stock Returns and Values

Impact of Managerial Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility in Korea

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Corporate sustainability and financial performance: Collective reputation as moderator of the relationship between environmental performance and firm market value

Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance: Evidence from Korea

The impact of ESG ratings on corporate value during COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from China and South Korea

Local corporate social responsibility, media coverage, and shareholder value