Abstract:Purpose Based on 3,775 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2013 using publicly available disclosure data for Korean listed firms, this study examines whether and how firm-level governance characteristics are associated with investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate the association between governance characteristics and investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Findings The authors find that firms with greater ownership of the largest shareholders and with a higher proportion of outside directors invest more in internal auditing. These results indicate that firms with higher incentive and demand for monitoring are more likely to invest more in internal auditing. The authors further find that the positive effect of the largest shareholder ownership (board independence) on investment in internal auditing is attenuated in firms with greater board independence (ownership of the largest shareholders) suggesting that the complementary effect of the two governance mechanisms associated with internal auditing weakens as they function simultaneously. Research limitations/implications The results provide regulators and investors with a clear picture of the governance characteristics of firms associated with investment in internal auditing. The results imply that both the largest shareholders and the outside board of directors play a significant role in resource allocation in internal auditing within a firm. The effect of allocation, however, can be attenuated contingent upon the combined characteristics of governance mechanisms. Originality/value Using large amounts of public archival data, this study adds to the extant literature on firm characteristics associated with investment in internal auditing. This study also contributes to the literature by expanding the scope of research on executive compensation to the locus of statutory internal auditors.

Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance: Evidence from Korea

The Effects of Shareholding of the National Pension Fund on Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry

Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis in South Korea

Environment, Social, and Governance Performance and Financial Performance With National Pension Fund Investment: Evidence From Korea

Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea

Assessing the Effect of Corporate ESG Management on Corporate Financial & Market Performance and Export

Do firms manage corporate social responsibility strategically?: Evidence from ESG ratings of Korean firms

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Do Institutional Investors Improve Corporate Governance Quality? Evidence From the Blockholdings of the Korean National Pension Service

An Empirical Analysis on Performance Inconsistency among Environmental, Social and Governance Components of ESG Ratings

Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from Korea

The Moderating Effect of ESG Level in the Relationship between Digital Transformation Capability and Financial Performance: Evidence from Foreign Subsidiaries of Korean Firms

ESG and Firm Performance: Focusing on the Environmental Strategy

The Impact of ESG Management on Investment Decision: Institutional Investors’ Perceptions of Country-Specific ESG Criteria

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The impact of the MSCI ESG Ratings on Korean Firms

Investment in internal auditing and governance characteristics

Corporate executives' incentives and ESG performance