Abstract:Purpose Based on 3,775 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2013 using publicly available disclosure data for Korean listed firms, this study examines whether and how firm-level governance characteristics are associated with investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate the association between governance characteristics and investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Findings The authors find that firms with greater ownership of the largest shareholders and with a higher proportion of outside directors invest more in internal auditing. These results indicate that firms with higher incentive and demand for monitoring are more likely to invest more in internal auditing. The authors further find that the positive effect of the largest shareholder ownership (board independence) on investment in internal auditing is attenuated in firms with greater board independence (ownership of the largest shareholders) suggesting that the complementary effect of the two governance mechanisms associated with internal auditing weakens as they function simultaneously. Research limitations/implications The results provide regulators and investors with a clear picture of the governance characteristics of firms associated with investment in internal auditing. The results imply that both the largest shareholders and the outside board of directors play a significant role in resource allocation in internal auditing within a firm. The effect of allocation, however, can be attenuated contingent upon the combined characteristics of governance mechanisms. Originality/value Using large amounts of public archival data, this study adds to the extant literature on firm characteristics associated with investment in internal auditing. This study also contributes to the literature by expanding the scope of research on executive compensation to the locus of statutory internal auditors.

Do Institutional Investors Improve Corporate Governance Quality? Evidence From the Blockholdings of the Korean National Pension Service

National Culture and Governance on Bondholder Wealth: Evidence from Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances Around the World

The Effects of Shareholding of the National Pension Fund on Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance: Evidence from Korea

Foreign board membership and firm value in Korea

Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea

Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis in South Korea

Do Foreign Investors Make Firms More Transparent? Evidence from Korea

Environment, Social, and Governance Performance and Financial Performance With National Pension Fund Investment: Evidence From Korea

Changes in foreign ownership and innovation investment: the case of Korean corporate governance reforms

Investment in internal auditing and governance characteristics

The Impact of Institutional Investors’ Responsible Investment Activities on ESG Performance: Focusing on Korea’s National Pension Service

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS)

Estimating the Value of Absolute Power: Evidence from Judiciary Decision Events on Controlling Shareholders in Large Business Groups

Executive compensation, firm performance, and Chaebols in Korea: Evidence from new panel data

Who Initiates Layoffs and Affects Firm Performance? Conflict of Interests between Active Foreign Institutional Investors and Outside Directors

The Institutional Investors’ Governance Role on Corporate Overinvestment: A Review Based on Endogeneity

Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea