Abstract:Background: An aspect that influences sport performance is maturation status, since, within the same chronological age group, boys who have advanced maturation outperform their late maturing peers in tests of muscular strength, power, and endurance. Therefore, the aims of the present study were: (i) to investigate the differences in biological maturation and anthropometric and morphological characteristics among three groups of Italian adolescents, two of which were sportive (practicing basketball and football) and one non-sportive, and (ii) to identify the anthropometric and morphological predictors that best discriminate these three groups. Methods: Sixty-one basketball and 62 soccer players and 68 non-sportive youths were measured (mean age = 13.0 ± 1.1 y). Anthropometric characteristics were taken and body mass index, cormic index, body composition parameters, and somatotype were derived. An estimation of maturity status was carried out considering the years from peak height velocity (PHV). Two-way 3 × 3 ANOVAs was performed on all anthropometric characteristics to test the differences within sport groups and maturity status groups. Discriminant function analysis (stepwise criteria) was then applied to anthropometric and body composition variables to classify subjects into the three different sport categories. Results: Differences in anthropometric characteristics were detected among the three groups. For somatotype, differences among all of the considered groups were higher for endomorphy (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.13). Biological maturity influences the differences in the anthropometric characteristics and body composition among subjects of the same chronological age during adolescence. The variables that best discriminated the three groups were represented by body composition parameters, body proportions, and body build. Conclusions: This study confirms that boys who practice sport present healthier body composition parameters, with lower level of fat parameters. The assessment of maturity status is a fundamental factor in explaining anthropometric and body composition differences among peers in this period. Its comprehension may assist coaches and technical staff in optimizing competitive efficiency and monitoring the success of training regimes.

Sex Differences in Strength During Development: Implications for Inclusivity and Fairness in Sport

Relative strength explains the differences in multi-joint rapid force production between sexes

Sex differences in human performance

Narrative Review of Sex Differences in Muscle Strength, Endurance, Activation, Size, Fiber Type, and Strength Training Participation Rates, Preferences, Motivations, Injuries, and Neuromuscular Adaptations

Musculoskeletal fitness: relative handgrip strength and vertical jump power from 10 to 18 years old

Sex differences in neuromuscular and biological determinants of isometric maximal force

Hormonal Basis of Biological Sex Differences in Human Athletic Performance

Sexual dimorphism in growth in the relative length of the forearm and relative knee height during adolescence

Age and sex effects in physical fitness components of 108,295 third graders including 515 primary schools and 9 cohorts

Sex differences in strength at the shoulder: a systematic review

Differences in body composition and physical fitness parameters among prepubertal and pubertal children engaged in extracurricular sports: the active health study

The Impact of Sex and Biological Maturation on Physical Fitness in Adolescent Badminton Players

Comparison of Sport Type on the Handgrip Strength Change in Young Athletes

Squat and Bench Press Force-Velocity Profiling in Male and Female Adolescent Rugby Players

Differences in Maturity and Anthropometric and Morphological Characteristics among Young Male Basketball and Soccer Players and Non-Players

Sex-specific associations of muscular fitness with overall academic performance and specific school subjects in adolescents: the EHDLA

Age and Gender Universality Research on Different Upper Limbs Strength Indicators in Physical Fitness Test Based Surface Electromyography Muscular Contribution

Age and Gender Differences in Anthropometric Characteristics and Motor Performance of 3 through 6 Young Kids Aged (Pilot Study)

Strength and functional characteristics of men and women 65 years and older

Sex Differences in Muscle Morphology between Male and Female Sprinters

Age and Sex Differences in the Limits of Human Performance: Fatigability and Real-World Data