Sex Differences in Muscle Morphology between Male and Female Sprinters

Robert Miller,Thomas G. Balshaw,Garry J. Massey,Sumiaki Maeo,Marcel B. Lanza,Bill Haug,Michael Johnston,Sam J. Allen,Jonathan P. Folland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00009.2023
2024-04-27
Journal of Applied Physiology
Abstract:There is a marked difference between males and females in sprint running performance, yet a comprehensive investigation of sex differences in the muscle morphology of sprinters remains to completed. This study compared muscle volumes of 23 individual leg muscles/compartments and five functional muscle groups, assessed with 3T magnetic resonance imaging, between male (n=31) and female (n=22) sprinters, and sub-groups of elite males (EM, n=5), elite females (EF, n=5), and performance matched (to elite females) males (PMM EF , n=6). Differences in muscle volume distribution between EM, EF and unathletic male controls (UM) were also assessed. For the full sprint cohorts, males were more muscular than females, but the differences were non-uniform and anatomically variable, with the largest differences in the hip extensors and flexors. However, amongst elite sprinters the sex differences in the volume of the functional muscle groups were almost uniform (absolute volume +47-53%), and the muscle volume distribution of EM was more similar to EF than UM (P<0.039). For PMM EF relative hip extensor volume, but not stature or percent body fat, differentiated for performance (PMM EF and EF < EM) rather than sex. In conclusion, whilst the full cohorts of sprinters showed a marked sex difference in the amount and distribution of muscle mass, elite sprinters appeared to be selected for a common muscle distribution phenotype that for these elite sub-groups was a stronger effect than that of sex. Relative hip extensor muscle volume appeared to be the primary determinant of the sex difference in performance.
physiology,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?