Evaluation of thickness of 3D printed versus thermoformed aligners: A prospective in vivo ageing experiment

Babak Sayahpour,Sara Eslami,Jakob Stuhlfelder,Sarah Bühling,Iulia Dahmer,Malcolm Goteni,Stefan Kopp,Ludovica Nucci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12822
2024-06-12
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Abstract:Background To compare and investigate the effects of intraoral ageing on the thickness of one group of directly printed and two groups of thermoformed aligners on the labial surface of maxillary central incisors. Materials and Methods Six groups (12 samples per group) were included in this prospective in vivo experiment. Groups DP‐Clin, INV‐Clin and CA‐Clin consisted of directly printed (Tera Harz TC‐85 DAC resin), thermoformed (Invisalign, PU based polymer) and in house thermoformed (CA‐Pro, PET‐G based polymer) aligners, retrieved after 1 week of intraoral service. Groups DP‐Ctr, INV‐Ctr and CA‐Ctr included unused aligners samples. Thickness measurements were conducted using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data that underwent log‐10 transformation was analysed by multiple linear regression analysis (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?