How Will Consensus on Key Elements of the International Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution Be Reached by the End of 2024?

Yangzhao Sun,Roland Weber,Yang Chen,Shijing Lin,Liyuan Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c11458

IF: 11.4

2024-11-28

Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract:Environ Sci Technol . 2024 Nov 26. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c11458. Online ahead of print. NO

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

How Can the Scope of a New Global Legally Binding Agreement on Plastic Pollution to Facilitate an Efficient Negotiation Be Clearly Defined?

Yangzhao Sun,Yan Lin,Eirik Hovland Steindal,Chao Jiang,Sen Yang,Thorjørn Larssen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02033

2021-04-28

Abstract:Environmental Science & TechnologyDOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02033

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
The Second Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to Develop an International Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution, Including the Marine Environment

Aleke Stöfen-O’Brien

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10153

2023-11-29

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law

Abstract:In June 2023, the second session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee ( INC ) to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including the marine environment concluded. It provided an opportunity to gauge the progress made by States and other stakeholders towards agreeing on the potential objective and treaty architecture of a future plastics treaty which is planned to be agreed upon by the end of 2024. This brief intervention outlines the developments made, as well as potential contentious issues that have arisen in relation to procedural and substantive aspects of the negotiations. It also reflects on key highlights. In June 2023, the second session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee ( INC ) to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including the marine environment concluded. It provided an opportunity to gauge the progress made by States and other stakeholders towards agreeing on the potential objective and treaty architecture of a future plastics treaty which is planned to be agreed upon by the end of 2024. This brief intervention outlines the developments made, as well as potential contentious issues that have arisen in relation to procedural and substantive aspects of the negotiations. It also reflects on key highlights. In June 2023, the second session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee ( INC ) to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including the marine environment concluded. It provided an opportunity to gauge the progress made by States and other stakeholders towards agreeing on the potential objective and treaty architecture of a future plastics treaty which is planned to be agreed upon by the end of 2024. This brief intervention outlines the developments made, as well as potential contentious issues that have arisen in relation to procedural and substantive aspects of the negotiations. It also reflects on key highlights.

law
A new treaty process offers hope to end plastic pollution

Antaya March,Keiron P. Roberts,Stephen Fletcher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00361-1

2022-11-10

Abstract:The development of a global legally binding treaty by the UN to end plastic pollution is underway. To be effective, the global treaty requires new levels of transparency, disclosure and cooperation to support evidence-based policymaking that avoids the fragmented and reactionary policies of the past.
The time for ambitious action is now: Science-based recommendations for plastic chemicals to inform an effective global plastic treaty

Susanne M Brander,Kala Senathirajah,Marina O Fernandez,Judith S Weis,Eva Kumar,Annika Jahnke,Nanna B Hartmann,Juan José Alava,Trisia Farrelly,Bethanie Carney Almroth,Ksenia J Groh,Kristian Syberg,Johanna Sophie Buerkert,Amila Abeynayaka,Andy M Booth,Xavier Cousin,Dorte Herzke,Laura Monclús,Carmen Morales-Caselles,Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati,Rana Al-Jaibachi,Martin Wagner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174881

2024-11-01

Abstract:The ubiquitous and global ecological footprint arising from the rapidly increasing rates of plastic production, use, and release into the environment is an important modern environmental issue. Of increasing concern are the risks associated with at least 16,000 chemicals present in plastics, some of which are known to be toxic, and which may leach out both during use and once exposed to environmental conditions, leading to environmental and human exposure. In response, the United Nations member states agreed to establish an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, the global plastics treaty. The resolution acknowledges that the treaty should prevent plastic pollution and its related impacts, that effective prevention requires consideration of the transboundary nature of plastic production, use and pollution, and that the full life cycle of plastics must be addressed. As a group of scientific experts and members of the Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty, we concur that there are six essential "pillars" necessary to truly reduce plastic pollution and allow for chemical detoxification across the full life cycle of plastics. These include a plastic chemical reduction and simplification, safe and sustainable design of plastic chemicals, incentives for change, holistic approaches for alternatives, just transition and equitable interventions, and centering human rights. There is a critical need for scientifically informed and globally harmonized information, transparency, and traceability criteria to protect the environment and public health. The right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment must be upheld, and thus it is crucial that scientists, industry, and policy makers work in concert to create a future free from hazardous plastic contamination.
An independent Scientific Committee on Plastic Pollution (SCOPP)

Mary George,Mohammed Rizman-Idid,Wee Cheah,Kishneth Palaniveloo,Siti Aisyah Alias

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117041

Abstract:The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution seeks to address, among other issues, the science-policy interface of plastic pollution in the forthcoming international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment (ILBI) to be finalised in 2024 by the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA). Given the importance of protecting the marine environment from plastic pollution, this paper reviews ILBI and argues that the UNEA should by Resolution establish an independent scientific committee. The committee should have an overarching global, regional, and local presence with institutional openness and accessibility to elucidate the science behind plastic pollution. This paper proposes that an independent scientific approach is preferrable to a combined science-policy institution seen in Secretariats and Conference of Parties in some conventions. The latter often exhibit numerous weaknesses. Establishing an independent scientific committee will ensure the science behind plastic pollution is robust, credible, and effectively informs policy decisions.
Reflections on the European Union's participation in negotiations of the global plastic pollution instrument under international environmental law

Qi Xu,Mingyang Zhang,Shuli Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1388975

IF: 5.247

2024-04-23

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Increasing plastic pollution is looming worldwide, damaging biodiversity, marine ecosystems, and human health. At the global level, no overarching normative framework sets out the specific rules and principles of general application in international environmental law, leading to difficulties in compliance and enforcement of plastic pollution governance. Developing an effective and legally binding instrument to tackle this emerging issue is imperative. The United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) has called for developing an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment, based on plastic's full lifecycle approach. As one of the active participants in the negotiations, the European Union (EU) has discussed various aspects of the instrument in detail and sought to introduce the EU governance experience at the international level. This article develops a framework that considers contextual, actor, and process factors to assess the extent of achieving EU targets. On this basis, we argue that the EU's objectives for the international instrument may be achieved at a high level. However, how the EU responds to challenges will also impact subsequent development, which may require the EU to adopt a more moderate stance and compromise on some controversial issues.

marine & freshwater biology
Reflections on the European Union’s Participation in Negotiations of the Global Plastic Pollution Instrument under International Environmental Law

Qi Xu,Mingyang Zhang,Shuli Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1388975

IF: 5.247

2024-01-01

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Increasing plastic pollution is looming worldwide, damaging biodiversity, marine ecosystems, and human health. At the global level, no overarching normative framework sets out the specific rules and principles of general application in international environmental law, leading to difficulties in compliance and enforcement of plastic pollution governance. Developing an effective and legally binding instrument to tackle this emerging issue is imperative. The United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) has called for developing an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment, based on plastic’s full lifecycle approach. As one of the active participants in the negotiations, the European Union (EU) has discussed various aspects of the instrument in detail and sought to introduce the EU governance experience at the international level. This article develops a framework that considers contextual, actor, and process factors to assess the extent of achieving EU targets. On this basis, we argue that the EU’s objectives for the international instrument may be achieved at a high level. However, how the EU responds to challenges will also impact subsequent development, which may require the EU to adopt a more moderate stance and compromise on some controversial issues.
Can we end plastic pollution?

Michael Gross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.004

IF: 9.2

2024-04-23

Current Biology

Abstract:By the end of this year, UN member states are due to complete the negotiation of a global deal to end plastic pollution. Meanwhile, the problems are mounting up and the search for more sustainable solutions continues.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
Pathways to reduce global plastic waste mismanagement and greenhouse gas emissions by 2050

A. Samuel Pottinger,Roland Geyer,Nivedita Biyani,Ciera C Martinez,Neil Nathan,Molly R Morse,Chao Liu,Shanying Hu,Magali de Bruyn,Carl Boettiger,Elijah Baker,Douglas J McCauley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr3837

IF: 56.9

2024-11-18

Science

Abstract:Plastic production and plastic pollution negatively affect our environment, environmental justice, and climate change. Using detailed global and regional plastics datasets coupled with socio-economic data, we employ machine learning to predict that, without intervention, annual mismanaged plastic waste will nearly double to 121 Mt (100 - 139 Mt 95% CI) by 2050. Annual greenhouse gas emissions from the plastic system are projected to grow by 37% to 3.35 Gt CO 2 equivalent (3.09 - 3.54 CO 2 e) over the same period. The United Nations plastic pollution treaty presents a unique opportunity to reshape these outcomes. We simulate eight candidate treaty policies and find that just four could together reduce mismanaged plastic waste by 91% (86% - 98%) and gross plastic-related greenhouse gas emissions by one third.

multidisciplinary sciences
Integrating a Chemicals Perspective into the Global Plastic Treaty

Zhanyun Wang,Antonia Praetorius

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00763

2022-12-20

Abstract:Environ Sci Technol Lett . 2022 Dec 13;9(12):1000-1006. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00763. Epub 2022 Nov 22. NO

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
Exploring long-term global environmental impacts of chlorinated paraffins (CPs) in waste: Implications for the Stockholm and Basel Conventions and the global plastic treaty

Jiazhe Chen,Shaoxuan Zhang,Weiguang Xu,Chengkang Chen,Anna Chen,Rongjing Lu,Qiaonan Jing,Jianguo Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108527

IF: 11.8

2024-02-26

Environment International

Abstract:Chlorinated paraffins (CPs), mainly short-chain CPs (SCCPs) and medium-chain CPs (MCCPs), are currently the most produced and used industrial chemicals related to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) globally. These chemicals are widely detected in the environment and in the human body. As the release of SCCPs and MCCPs from products represents only a small fraction of their stock in products, the potential long-term release of CPs from a large variety of products at the waste stage has become an issue of great concern. The results of this study showed that, by 2050, SCCPs and MCCPs used between 2000 and 2021 will cumulatively generate 226.49 Mt of CP-containing wastes, comprising 8610.13 kt of SCCPs and MCCPs. Approximately 79.72 Mt of CP-containing wastes is predicted to be generated abroad through the international trade of products using SCCPs and MCCPs. The magnitude, distribution, and growth of CP-containing wastes subject to environmentally sound disposal will depend largely on the relevant provisions of the Stockholm and Basel Conventions and the forthcoming global plastic treaty. According to multiple scenarios synthesizing the provisions of the three conventions, 26.6–101.1 Mt of CP-containing wastes will be subject to environmentally sound disposal as POP wastes, which would pose a great challenge to the waste disposal capacity of China, as well as for countries importing CP-containing products. The additional 5-year exemption period for MCCPs is expected to see an additional 10 Mt of CP-containing wastes subject to environmentally sound disposal. Thus, there is an urgent need to strengthen the Stockholm and Basel Conventions and the global plastic treaty.

environmental sciences
Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution

Winnie W Y Lau,Yonathan Shiran,Richard M Bailey,Ed Cook,Martin R Stuchtey,Julia Koskella,Costas A Velis,Linda Godfrey,Julien Boucher,Margaret B Murphy,Richard C Thompson,Emilia Jankowska,Arturo Castillo Castillo,Toby D Pilditch,Ben Dixon,Laura Koerselman,Edward Kosior,Enzo Favoino,Jutta Gutberlet,Sarah Baulch,Meera E Atreya,David Fischer,Kevin K He,Milan M Petit,U Rashid Sumaila,Emily Neil,Mark V Bernhofen,Keith Lawrence,James E Palardy,Winnie W. Y. Lau,Richard M. Bailey,Martin R. Stuchtey,Costas A. Velis,Margaret B. Murphy,Richard C. Thompson,Toby D. Pilditch,Meera E. Atreya,Kevin K. He,Milan M. Petit,U. Rashid Sumaila,Mark V. Bernhofen,James E. Palardy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9475

IF: 56.9

2020-09-18

Science

Abstract:A mess of plastic It is not clear what strategies will be most effective in mitigating harm from the global problem of plastic pollution. Borrelle et al. and Lau et al. discuss possible solutions and their impacts. Both groups found that substantial reductions in plastic-waste generation can be made in the coming decades with immediate, concerted, and vigorous action, but even in the best case scenario, huge quantities of plastic will still accumulate in the environment. Science , this issue p. 1515 , p. 1455

multidisciplinary sciences
Transforming the Global Plastics Economy: The Role of Economic Policies in the Global Governance of Plastic Pollution

Diana Barrowclough,Carolyn Deere Birkbeck,Carolyn Birkbeck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11010026

2022-01-14

Social Sciences

Abstract:International policy discussions on plastic pollution are entering a new phase, with more than 100 governments calling for the launch of negotiations for a new global plastics agreement in 2022. This article aims to contribute to efforts to identify effective international policy levers to address plastic pollution. It takes stock of the evolution of views and perceptions on this complex and multi-faceted topic—from concerns about marine pollution and waste management towards new strategic directions that involve the entire plastics life-cycle and include climate and health impacts associated with the proliferation of plastics. It also traces the progressive development of responses—from voluntary approaches involving multiple stakeholders to national and international approaches focused on regulation. The paper is informed by desk research, a literature review and participation by the authors in informal and formal global governance processes on plastic pollution, the environment and development in the United Nations and World Trade Organization between 2019 and 2021. It also draws on empirical findings from a novel and original database on the life-cycle of plastic trade created by the authors. The paper argues that the important focus on downstream dimensions of plastic pollution—and strategies to address them—needs to be complemented by a broad life-cycle and “upstream” perspective that addresses plastic pollution at its source. It highlights the political economy tensions and inconsistencies at hand, observing that while some countries are taking concerted efforts to reduce pollution (including through bans on certain kinds of plastic and plastic products); to promote more circular plastic economies; and to reduce the carbon footprint of plastics (as part of a wider effort to decarbonize their economies), trade and investment in the plastic industry continues to rise. The paper argues that to reduce plastic pollution, emerging global governance efforts must integrate international environmental law and cooperation with a complementary and enabling global framework that addresses the economic, financial, industrial and trade policies needed to drive the necessary transformation of the plastics sector.
Plastic pollution requires an integrative systems approach to understand and mitigate risk

Winnie Courtene-Jones,Nathaniel J Clark,Richard C Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20220018

2022-12-01

Abstract:To date, much effort has been placed on quantifying plastic pollution and understanding its negative environmental effects, arguably to the detriment of research and evaluation of potential interventions. This has led to piecemeal progress in interventions to reduce plastic pollution, which do not correspond to the pace of emissions. For substances that are used on a global scale and identified as hazardous, there is a need to act before irreversible damage is done. For example, the history of dichlorodiphenyltrichloethane's (DDT) use has demonstrated that legacy chemicals with properties of persistence can still be found in the environment despite being first prohibited 50 years ago. Despite the growing evidence of harm, evidence to inform actions to abate plastic pollution lag behind. In part, this is because of the multifaceted nature of plastic pollution and understanding the connections between social, economic and environmental dimensions are complex. As such we highlight the utility of integrative systems approaches for addressing such complex issues, which unites a diversity of stakeholders (including policy, industry, academia and society), and provides a framework to identify to develop specific, measurable and time-bound international policies on plastic pollution and meet the ambitious yet necessary goals of the UN Plastic Treaty.
Beyond surface: Unveiling ecological and economic ramifications of microplastic pollution in the oceans

Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan,Ayesha Mohyuddin,Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman,Hui Hwang Goh,Dongdong Zhang,Abdelkader Anouzla,Faissal Aziz,Joan C Casila,Imran Ali,Buntora Pasaribu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11070

Abstract:Every year, the global production of plastic waste reaches a staggering 400 million metric tons (Mt), precipitating adverse consequences for the environment, food safety, and biodiversity as it degrades into microplastics (MPs). The multifaceted nature of MP pollution, coupled with its intricate physiological impacts, underscores the pressing need for comprehensive policies and legislative frameworks. Such measures, alongside advancements in technology, hold promise in averting ecological catastrophe in the oceans. Mandated legislation represents a pivotal step towards restoring oceanic health and securing the well-being of the planet. This work offers an overview of the policy hurdles, legislative initiatives, and prospective strategies for addressing global pollution due to MP. Additionally, this work explores innovative approaches that yield fresh insights into combating plastic pollution across various sectors. Emphasizing the importance of a global plastics treaty, the article underscores its potential to galvanize collaborative efforts in mitigating MP pollution's deleterious effects on marine ecosystems. Successful implementation of such a treaty could revolutionize the plastics economy, steering it towards a circular, less polluting model operating within planetary boundaries. Failure to act decisively risks exacerbating the scourge of MP pollution and its attendant repercussions on both humanity and the environment. Central to this endeavor are the formulation, content, and execution of the treaty itself, which demand careful consideration. While recognizing that a global plastics treaty is not a panacea, it serves as a mechanism for enhancing plastics governance and elevating global ambitions towards achieving zero plastic pollution by 2040. Adopting a life cycle approach to plastic management allows for a nuanced understanding of possible trade-offs between environmental impact and economic growth, guiding the selection of optimal solutions with socio-economic implications in mind. By embracing a comprehensive strategy that integrates legislative measures and technological innovations, we can substantially reduce the influx of marine plastic litter at its sources, safeguarding the oceans for future generations.
Finding equitable solutions to the land-based sources of marine plastic pollution: Sovereignty as a double-edged sword

Solène Guggisberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105960

IF: 4.315

2024-01-01

Marine Policy

Abstract:Marine litter is a global and transboundary pollution problem. Recent attention has focused on the impact of this issue on areas beyond national jurisdiction. In many cases, marine litter is traced to a coastal State where debris have been released into the sea. Effective and legally-binding commitments at the global level to tackle land-based sources of marine pollution are rare, in large part because of the sensitive nature of territorial sovereignty. When it comes to addressing the marine plastics crisis, sovereignty is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the international legal regime traditionally addressing marine litter, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, does not specifically respond to, and is not able to adequately address, the issue of plastics as a land-based source of marine pollution. While it contributes to social equity by recognizing the special position of developing States in terms of capacity and need for economic development, this deference to domestic decisions is not conducive to the adoption of binding and global standards. Since a large majority of plastics in the oceans originate from land, this weakness is a major concern. On the other hand, sovereignty might contribute to a solution within the regime regulating trade in waste products: unilateral actions taken in application of sovereign powers and aimed at reducing trade in plastic waste led to major multilateral actions with the potential to reduce the issue of marine plastic pollution. In recent times, the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste and their Disposal has indeed become an important forum to respond to the plastic waste issue, with the potential to contribute to a solution to the marine dimension of this crisis. This regime is not perfect, especially in that its complexity and reliance on enforcement at the customs level leave ample opportunities for criminal activities to flourish. Areas for improvement include addressing the legal uncertainty regarding bilateral, regional, and multilateral agreements as well as certain key definitions; strengthening the prior informed consent procedure and the Mechanism for Promoting Implementation and Compliance; and heavily investing in capacity building and technology transfer. Nonetheless, this regime provides a widely-ratified framework to decrease trade in plastic waste considered hazardous or requiring special consideration – these two categories cover most hard-to-recycle plastics. In that sense, the Basel Convention regime has the potential to reduce mismanaged plastic waste leaking into the oceans and to contribute to social equity between States–if not domestically–by reducing the practice of wealthy countries using developing States as dumping grounds under the pretense of mutually beneficial trade in waste products.

environmental studies,international relations
The global governance of marine plastic pollution: rethinking the extended producer responsibility system

Jiang Zhou,Di Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1363269

IF: 5.247

2024-03-05

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:The harm caused by marine plastic pollution to the wider environment highlights its importance as a governance issue. The Fifth United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) adopted a resolution, "End Plastic Pollution: Towards an International Legally Binding Instrument", which represents a shift towards globalism in the governance of marine plastic pollution. This resolution focuses on the circular economy of plastics and highlights the role of corporations in contributing to a more socially responsible society, thereby increasing emphasis has been placed on the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system that integrates the two factors referred to above. This paper provides a full technical explanation of the EPR system and its implementation in entities such as the European Union, the United States, and China. The challenges faced when integrating the EPR system into international legal instruments for plastic governance were identified, including the different national perspectives, the absence of a supervisor in the public domain, the obscurity of its application, and the lack of supporting measures for the implementation of the system. Therefore, new standards and requirements in the governance of marine plastic pollution and the advantages associated with implementing the full-life-cycle obligations under the EPR system on plastic producers should be fully considered. On this basis, the positioning and implications of the EPR system should be clarified by obligation-oriented regulation and extension-based interpretation. Moreover, the extended and prolonged applicability of the system, including the original sources of marine plastic wastes and considerations of the full-life-cycle of plastics, should be achieved in pursuit of improvements and upgrades in application and complementary policies. If this can be achieved, it is hoped that the goals of protecting human health and controlling plastic pollution can be achieved, contributing to the development of an ocean-based economy and a better world.

marine & freshwater biology
A local-to-global emissions inventory of macroplastic pollution

Joshua W Cottom,Ed Cook,Costas A Velis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07758-6

IF: 64.8

Nature

Abstract:Negotiations for a global treaty on plastic pollution1 will shape future policies on plastics production, use and waste management. Its parties will benefit from a high-resolution baseline of waste flows and plastic emission sources to enable identification of pollution hotspots and their causes2. Nationally aggregated waste management data can be distributed to smaller scales to identify generalized points of plastic accumulation and source phenomena3-11. However, it is challenging to use this type of spatial allocation to assess the conditions under which emissions take place12,13. Here we develop a global macroplastic pollution emissions inventory by combining conceptual modelling of emission mechanisms with measurable activity data. We define emissions as materials that have moved from the managed or mismanaged system (controlled or contained state) to the unmanaged system (uncontrolled or uncontained state-the environment). Using machine learning and probabilistic material flow analysis, we identify emission hotspots across 50,702 municipalities worldwide from five land-based plastic waste emission sources. We estimate global plastic waste emissions at 52.1 [48.3-56.3] million metric tonnes (Mt) per year, with approximately 57% wt. and 43% wt. open burned and unburned debris, respectively. Littering is the largest emission source in the Global North, whereas uncollected waste is the dominant emissions source across the Global South. We suggest that our findings can help inform treaty negotiations and develop national and sub-national waste management action plans and source inventories.
Insights from international environmental legislation and protocols for the global plastic treaty

Margrethe Aanesen,Julide C. Ahi,Tenaw G. Abate,Farhan R. Khan,Frans P. de Vries,Hauke Kite-Powell,Nicola J. Beaumont

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53099-9

IF: 4.6

2024-02-03

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Plastic pollution has emerged as a global challenge necessitating collective efforts to mitigate its adverse environmental consequences. International negotiations are currently underway to establish a global plastic treaty. Emphasizing the need for solution-orientated research, rather than focusing on further defining the problems of widespread environmental occurrence and ecological impacts, this paper extracts insights and draws key patterns that are relevant for these international negotiations. The analysis reveals that (i) environmental rather than human health concerns have been the predominant driving force behind previous regulations targeting pollutants, and (ii) the decision to ban or discontinue the use of harmful pollutants is primarily affected by the availability of viable substitutes. These two key findings are relevant to the discussions of the ongoing Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) on the global plastic treaty and underscore the recognition of environmental consequences associated with plastic pollution while emphasizing the need to enhance the knowledge base of potential human health risks. Leveraging the availability of substitutes can significantly contribute to the development and implementation of effective strategies aimed at reducing plastic usage and corresponding pollution.

multidisciplinary sciences
The global threat from plastic pollution

Matthew MacLeod,Hans Peter H Arp,Mine B Tekman,Annika Jahnke,Hans Peter H. Arp,Mine B. Tekman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5433

IF: 56.9

2021-07-02

Science

Abstract:Plastic pollution accumulating in an area of the environment is considered “poorly reversible” if natural mineralization processes occurring there are slow and engineered remediation solutions are improbable. Should negative outcomes in these areas arise as a consequence of plastic pollution, they will be practically irreversible. Potential impacts from poorly reversible plastic pollution include changes to carbon and nutrient cycles; habitat changes within soils, sediments, and aquatic ecosystems; co-occurring biological impacts on endangered or keystone species; ecotoxicity; and related societal impacts. The rational response to the global threat posed by accumulating and poorly reversible plastic pollution is to rapidly reduce plastic emissions through reductions in consumption of virgin plastic materials, along with internationally coordinated strategies for waste management.

multidisciplinary sciences

How Will Consensus on Key Elements of the International Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution Be Reached by the End of 2024?

How Can the Scope of a New Global Legally Binding Agreement on Plastic Pollution to Facilitate an Efficient Negotiation Be Clearly Defined?

The Second Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to Develop an International Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution, Including the Marine Environment

A new treaty process offers hope to end plastic pollution

The time for ambitious action is now: Science-based recommendations for plastic chemicals to inform an effective global plastic treaty

An independent Scientific Committee on Plastic Pollution (SCOPP)

Reflections on the European Union's participation in negotiations of the global plastic pollution instrument under international environmental law

Reflections on the European Union’s Participation in Negotiations of the Global Plastic Pollution Instrument under International Environmental Law

Can we end plastic pollution?

Pathways to reduce global plastic waste mismanagement and greenhouse gas emissions by 2050

Integrating a Chemicals Perspective into the Global Plastic Treaty

Exploring long-term global environmental impacts of chlorinated paraffins (CPs) in waste: Implications for the Stockholm and Basel Conventions and the global plastic treaty

Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution

Transforming the Global Plastics Economy: The Role of Economic Policies in the Global Governance of Plastic Pollution

Plastic pollution requires an integrative systems approach to understand and mitigate risk

Beyond surface: Unveiling ecological and economic ramifications of microplastic pollution in the oceans

Finding equitable solutions to the land-based sources of marine plastic pollution: Sovereignty as a double-edged sword

The global governance of marine plastic pollution: rethinking the extended producer responsibility system

A local-to-global emissions inventory of macroplastic pollution

Insights from international environmental legislation and protocols for the global plastic treaty

The global threat from plastic pollution