Does Early Treatment With Teriparatide Prevent the Need for Surgical Intervention in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Vishnu Vikraman Nair,Vishal Kundnani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241265327
2024-06-25
Global Spine Journal
Abstract:Global Spine Journal, Ahead of Print. Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early administration of Teriparatide in preventing the necessity of surgical intervention in individuals with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.MethodsIn a 24-month follow-up retrospective analysis, 191 OVCF patients from January 2016 to October 2020 were randomly assigned to Non teriparatide Group A (n = 104) or Group B teriparatide (n = 87). At baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following treatment, demographic data and need of surgical intervention, VAS, ODI, union rates, and kyphosis development, were examined.ResultsOur study found that non-teriparatide group individuals had an 11.53% higher risk of non-union formation that required surgery. Only 8.63% of teriparatide group patients needed surgery. Both groups had significant VAS score reductions. Non-teriparatide group scores declined from 8.38 ± 0.74 to 3.15 ± 1.40, while teriparatide group scores decreased from 8.49 ± 0.73 to 1.11 ± 0.31. The 2-year follow-up ODI scores significantly decreased, with values of 25.02 ± 13.94 for non-teriparatide patients and 15.11 ± 2.17 for teriparatide patients. The kyphosis progression angles in the teriparatide group were considerably lower (4.97 ± 0.78°) compared to the other group (8.09 ± 1.25°).ConclusionWith increasing elderly populations, it is necessary to take measures to prevent surgical intervention in osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. Teriparatide can be employed as an early medication in the management of these fractures to avert non-union and the minimise the progression of kyphosis.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?