Review of the Upright Balance Assessment Based on the Force Plate

Baoliang Chen,Peng Liu,Feiyun Xiao,Zhengshi Liu,Yong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052696
IF: 4.614
2021-03-08
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Quantitative assessment is crucial for the evaluation of human postural balance. The force plate system is the key quantitative balance assessment method. The purpose of this study is to review the important concepts in balance assessment and analyze the experimental conditions, parameter variables, and application scope based on force plate technology. As there is a wide range of balance assessment tests and a variety of commercial force plate systems to choose from, there is room for further improvement of the test details and evaluation variables of the balance assessment. The recommendations presented in this article are the foundation and key part of the postural balance assessment; these recommendations focus on the type of force plate, the subject’s foot posture, and the choice of assessment variables, which further enriches the content of posturography. In order to promote a more reasonable balance assessment method based on force plates, further methodological research and a stronger consensus are still needed.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the standardization issue in human upright balance assessment. Specifically, the paper aims to review important concepts of upright balance assessment based on force - plate technology, and analyze experimental conditions, parameter variables and application scopes. Due to the wide variety of balance assessment tests and the diverse selection of commercial force - plate systems, there is room for further improvement in test details and assessment variables. The paper points out that in order to promote more reasonable balance assessment methods based on force - plates, further methodological research and stronger consensus are still required. The main problems mentioned in the paper include: 1. **Standardization of environmental conditions**: Ensure the consistency of the assessment environment, such as good lighting, quiet and noiseless, and comfortable temperature (unless these variables are for research purposes). Special environments will affect the subject's postural control system, such as sensory orientation (SO) and information processing system. 2. **Selection and use of force - plates**: It is recommended to use two independent force - plates to measure the ground reaction force under the left and right feet and the center of pressure point (COP) respectively, especially for people with asymmetrical weight distribution, such as hemiplegic or amputee patients. 3. **Standardization of test time and number of trials**: The test time of static postural tasks is usually longer than that of dynamic postural tasks. Under static conditions, since the stable process of postural control requires several seconds of adjustment time, the data parameters recorded within 25 - 40 seconds are recommended to be stable and reliable. Under dynamic conditions, the time for each trial should be 15 - 25 seconds, and for subjects with weaker physical conditions, 10 - 20 seconds are more appropriate. Repeating the same postural task may lead to learning effects or fatigue, so it is recommended to randomly arrange the test order. 4. **Standardization of foot postures**: Foot postures directly affect the area of the support base. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure the standardization of foot postures among different subjects and in multiple trials of the same subject. However, a uniformly regulated foot posture may not be suitable for every subject, resulting in deviation of assessment results. It is recommended that subjects use their most natural foot postures for balance assessment. 5. **Safety in the assessment process**: In postural balance assessment with interference, subjects may lose their balance, so safety in the assessment process is very important. The design of the safety system should avoid providing too much mechanical support so as not to affect the assessment results. 6. **Influence of target fixation distance**: Subjects are usually required to fixate on a target in space during postural balance assessment, and the distance between the target and the eyes will affect the stability of the posture. Usually, the target is placed at a position equivalent to the subject's eye - level height, and the distance is between 1 - 3 meters. By solving these problems, the paper aims to provide valuable reference suggestions for force - plate - based postural balance assessment to improve the accuracy and reliability of the assessment.