Abstract:Background Although high-throughput genotyping arrays have made whole-genome association studies (WGAS) feasible, only a small proportion of SNPs in the human genome are actually surveyed in such studies. In addition, various SNP arrays assay different sets of SNPs, which leads to challenges in comparing results and merging data for meta-analyses. Genome-wide imputation of untyped markers allows us to address these issues in a direct fashion. Methods 384 Caucasian American liver donors were genotyped using Illumina 650Y (Ilmn650Y) arrays, from which we also derived genotypes from the Ilmn317K array. On these data, we compared two imputation methods: MACH and BEAGLE. We imputed 2.5 million HapMap Release22 SNPs, and conducted GWAS on ~40,000 liver mRNA expression traits (eQTL analysis). In addition, 200 Caucasian American and 200 African American subjects were genotyped using the Affymetrix 500 K array plus a custom 164 K fill-in chip. We then imputed the HapMap SNPs and quantified the accuracy by randomly masking observed SNPs. Results MACH and BEAGLE perform similarly with respect to imputation accuracy. The Ilmn650Y results in excellent imputation performance, and it outperforms Affx500K or Ilmn317K sets. For Caucasian Americans, 90% of the HapMap SNPs were imputed at 98% accuracy. As expected, imputation of poorly tagged SNPs (untyped SNPs in weak LD with typed markers) was not as successful. It was more challenging to impute genotypes in the African American population, given (1) shorter LD blocks and (2) admixture with Caucasian populations in this population. To address issue (2), we pooled HapMap CEU and YRI data as an imputation reference set, which greatly improved overall performance. The approximate 40,000 phenotypes scored in these populations provide a path to determine empirically how the power to detect associations is affected by the imputation procedures. That is, at a fixed false discovery rate, the number of cis-eQTL discoveries detected by various methods can be interpreted as their relative statistical power in the GWAS. In this study, we find that imputation offer modest additional power (by 4%) on top of either Ilmn317K or Ilmn650Y, much less than the power gain from Ilmn317K to Ilmn650Y (13%). Conclusion Current algorithms can accurately impute genotypes for untyped markers, which enables researchers to pool data between studies conducted using different SNP sets. While genotyping itself results in a small error rate (e.g. 0.5%), imputing genotypes is surprisingly accurate. We found that dense marker sets (e.g. Ilmn650Y) outperform sparser ones (e.g. Ilmn317K) in terms of imputation yield and accuracy. We also noticed it was harder to impute genotypes for African American samples, partially due to population admixture, although using a pooled reference boosts performance. Interestingly, GWAS carried out using imputed genotypes only slightly increased power on top of assayed SNPs. The reason is likely due to adding more markers via imputation only results in modest gain in genetic coverage, but worsens the multiple testing penalties. Furthermore, cis-eQTL mapping using dense SNP set derived from imputation achieves great resolution, and locate associate peak closer to causal variants than conventional approach.

Evaluation of genotype imputation using Glimpse tools on low coverage ancient DNA

Evaluation of ancient DNA imputation: a simulation study

An empirical evaluation of genotype imputation of ancient DNA

Benchmarking Imputed Low Coverage Genomes in a Human Population Genetics Context

Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.

Benchmarking for genotyping and imputation using degraded DNA for forensic applications across diverse populations

Performance of Genotype Imputation for Low Frequency and Rare Variants from the 1000 Genomes

Genotype imputation in human genomic studies

Performance of Genotype Imputation for Rare Variants Identified in Exons and Flanking Regions of Genes

Benchmarking kinship estimation tools for ancient genomes using pedigree simulations

Assessing the impact of post-mortem damage and contamination on imputation performance in ancient DNA

Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies

Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel

Estimating allele frequencies, ancestry proportions and genotype likelihoods in the presence of mapping bias

Genotype-Imputation Accuracy Across Worldwide Human Populations

On Combining Reference Data to Improve Imputation Accuracy

Rapid and accurate genotype imputation from low coverage short read, long read, and cell free DNA sequence

Genotype imputation accuracy and the quality metrics of the minor ancestry in multi-ancestry reference panels

A Novel Efficient Algorithm for Common Variants Genotyping from Low-Coverage Sequencing Data

Imputation accuracy across global human populations

Analyses And Comparison Of Accuracy Of Different Genotype Imputation Methods