Genotype Imputation and Reference Panel: A Systematic Evaluation

Wei-Yang Bai,Xiao-Wei Zhu,Pei-Kuan Cong,Xue-Jun Zhang,J Brent Richards,Hou-Feng Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/642546

2019-01-01

Abstract:Here, 622 imputations were conducted with 394 customized reference panels for Han Chinese and European populations. Besides validating the fact that the imputation accuracy could always benefit from the increased panel size when the reference panel was population-specific, the results brought two new thoughts as follows. First, when the haplotype size of reference panel was fixed, the imputation accuracy of common and low-frequency variants (MAF>0.5%) decreased while the population-diversity of reference panel increased, but for rare variants (MAF<0.5%), a fraction of diversity (<20%) of panel could improve the imputation accuracy. Second, when the haplotype size of reference panel was increased with extra population-diverse samples, the imputation accuracy of common variants (MAF>5%) for European population could always benefit from the expanding sample size. But for Han Chinese population, the accuracy of all imputed variants reached the highest when reference panel contained a fraction of extra diverse sample (15%∼21%). In addition, we evaluated the existing reference panels such as the HRC and 1000G Phase3 and CONVERGE. For European population, HRC was the best reference panel. For Han Chinese population, we proposed an optimum constituent ratio for the Han Chinese imputation if researchers would like to customize their own sequenced reference panel, but a high quality and large-scale Chinese reference panel was still needed. Our findings could be generalized to the other populations with conservative genome, a tool was provided to investigate other populations of interest (https://github.com/Abyss-bai/reference-panel-reconstruction). Highlights (Key points) A total of 394 reference panels were designed and customized by three strategies, and large-scale genotype imputations were performed with these panels for systematic evaluation in Han Chinese and European populations. The accuracy of imputed variants reached the highest when reference panel contains a fraction of extra diverse sample (15%∼21%) for Han Chinese population, if the haplotype size of the reference panel was increased with extra samples, which is the most common cases. The imputation accuracy showed the different trends between Han Chinese and European populations. In a sense, the European genome may more diverse than Han Chinese genome by itself. Existing reference panels were not the best choice for Chinese imputation, a high quality and large-scale Chinese reference panel was still needed.