Abstract:Abstract Introduction: Advancements in technology have revolutionized the landscape of medical imaging, offering a multitude of modalities. However, this progress is not always fully traceable to patients, necessitating studies in this area to bridge the gap between technological advancements and patients’ insights. This study delves into patient awareness, preferences, and understanding concerning radiation risk in medical imaging procedures using ionizing radiation. Material and methods: An anonymous survey was conducted among 152 patients in Bulgaria who underwent X-ray procedures to gauge their insights into medical imaging. Data analysis utilized SPSS version 20.0, computing frequencies and percentages for categorical variables like gender, age, and education. Results: Significant correlations were found between gender and the need for knowledge related to radiation risks (χ2 = 4.622, p = 0.032), as well as patient understanding of radiation dose information and decision-making preferences (χ2 = 10.800; p = 0.020). Female participants showed higher awareness levels in these areas compared to male participants. Younger patients, notably aged 36-50 (52.6%), comprised a significant portion undergoing X-ray imaging, diverging from global trends. Age correlated with the frequency of X-ray examinations (χ2 = 171.256; p = 0.000) and decision-making preferences (χ2 = 8.324; p = 0.016), with older patients favoring informed decisions with physician input. Education levels significantly influenced radiation risk awareness (χ2 = 7.084, p = 0.008) and understanding of radiation dose information (χ2 = 14.752, p = 0.001). Patients with higher education levels demonstrated a significantly better understanding of absorbed radiation doses compared to those with secondary education. These findings highlight the influence of demographic factors such as gender, age, and education on patient awareness, knowledge acquisition, and decision-making processes regarding medical imaging and radiation risks. Conclusions: Tailored communication strategies, informed consent practices, and ongoing specialist education are crucial to enhancing patient awareness, optimizing decision-making processes, and ensuring radiation safety in medical imaging. Implementation of electronic health records can further improve radiation exposure monitoring, aligning with evolving technological standards and patient needs.

Factors Affecting Response Rates in Medical Imaging Survey Studies

Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment

Survey response rates in health sciences education research: A 10-year meta-analysis

Predictors of response rates of safety culture questionnaires in healthcare: a systematic review and analysis

Enhancing Response Rates in Web-Based Surveys: The Impact of Direct Participant Contact

Optimizing Survey Response Rates in Graduate Medical Education Research Studies

Association between response rates and monetary incentives in sample study: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Meta-Analysis of How Country-Level Factors Affect Web Survey Response Rates

In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire

Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework

Monetary Incentives in Clinician Surveys: An Analysis and Systematic Review With a Focus on Establishing Best Practices

Surveys in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Reporting Guideline

Evidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey

Neurointerventional surveys between 2000 and 2023: a systematic review

Insights into patient awareness and preferences in medical imaging procedures involving ionizing radiation

[Patients' Predisposition to Participate in Clinical Trials at Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study]

Quality of survey reporting in nephrology journals: a methodologic review

Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan

Demographic differences between health care workers who did or did not respond to a safety and organizational culture survey

How Many Responses Do We Need? Using Generalizability Analysis to Estimate Minimum Necessary Response Rates for Online Student Evaluations

Prevalence Survey of Cognition of Potential Participants for Clinical Trials