Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Zhen-Dong Zhong,Ying-Yuan Xie,Hong-Xuan Chen,Ye-Lin Lan,Xue-Hong Liu,Jing-Yun Ji,Fu Wu,Lingmei Jin,Jiekai Chen,Daniel W. Mak,Zhang Zhang,Guan-Zheng Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37596-5
IF: 16.6
2023-04-05
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been increasingly recognized as a new and important regulator of gene expression. To date, transcriptome-wide m6A detection primarily relies on well-established methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. However, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform has recently emerged as a promising alternative method to study m6A. While multiple computational tools are being developed to facilitate the direct detection of nucleotide modifications, little is known about the capabilities and limitations of these tools. Here, we systematically compare ten tools used for mapping m6A from ONT DRS data. We find that most tools present a trade-off between precision and recall, and integrating results from multiple tools greatly improve performance. Using a negative control could improve precision by subtracting certain intrinsic bias. We also observed variation in detection capabilities and quantitative information among motifs, and identified sequencing depth and m6A stoichiometry as potential factors affecting performance. Our study provides insight into the computational tools currently used for mapping m6A based on ONT DRS data and highlights the potential for further improving these tools, which may serve as the basis for future research.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?