Microbiota in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

A. Schwiertz,Manuela Jacobi,J. Frick,Markus Richter,K. Rusch,H. Köhler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.046

IF: 2.99

2010-08-01

Jornal de Pediatria

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Differential RNA Methylation Analysis for MeRIP-seq Data under General Experimental Design

Zhenxing Guo,Andrew M Shafik,Peng Jin,Hao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac601

IF: 5.8

2022-09-07

Bioinformatics

Abstract:RNA epigenetics is an emerging field to study the post-transcriptional gene regulation. The dynamics of RNA epigenetic modification have been reported to associate with many human diseases. Recently developed high-throughput technology named Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeRIP-seq) enables the transcriptome-wide profiling of N6-methyladenosine (m 6 A) modification and comparison of RNA epigenetic modifications. There are a few computational methods for the comparison of mRNA modifications under different conditions but they all suffer from serious limitations. In this work, we develop a novel statistical method to detect differentially methylated mRNA regions from MeRIP-seq data. We model the sequence count data by a hierarchical negative binomial model that accounts for various sources of variations, and derive parameter estimation and statistical testing procedures for flexible statistical inferences under general experimental designs. Extensive benchmark evaluations in simulation and real data analyses demonstrate that our method is more accurate, robust, and flexible compared to existing methods. Our method TRESS is implemented as an R/Bioconductor package and is available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/TRESS. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

biochemical research methods,biotechnology & applied microbiology,mathematical & computational biology
Mapping Messenger RNA Methylations at Single Base Resolution

Jie Cao,Xiao Shu,Xin-Hua Feng,Jianzhao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.02.001

IF: 8.972

2021-01-01

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract:The messenger RNA (mRNA) methylations in mammalian cells have been found to contain N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N6-2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), 7-methylguanosine (m7G), 1-methyladenosine (m1A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), and 2′-O-methylation (2′-OMe). Their regulatory functions in control of mRNA fate and gene expression are being increasingly uncovered. To unambiguously understand the critical roles of mRNA methylations in physiological and pathological processes, mapping these methylations at single base resolution is highly required. Here, we will review the progresses made in methylation sequencing methodologies developed mainly in recent two years, with an emphasis on chemical labeling-assisted single base resolution methods, and discuss the problems and prospects as well.
An RNA Methylation-Sensitive AIEgen-Aptamer Reporting System for Quantitatively Evaluating M6a Methylase and Demethylase Activities

Xiner Ying,Chenyang Huang,Tengwei Li,Ting Li,Minsong Gao,Fengqin Wang,Jie Cao,Jianzhao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.3c00613

IF: 4.634

2023-01-01

ACS Chemical Biology

Abstract:N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) chemical modification determines the fate of the mammalian cellular mRNA to modulate crucial physiological and pathological processes. Dysregulations of m6A methylase and demethylase have been linked to cancer diseases. Therefore, evaluations of enzyme mutants' activities and related inhibitors for discovery of targeted therapeutic strategies are very necessary. Here, we report an RNA methylation-sensitive fluorescent aptamer reporting assay to measure the catalytic activities of m6A enzymes under various conditions. The rationale is that when an RNA aptamer, named A-Pepper, is methylated at a specific adenosine position to generate m6A-Pepper, the latter displays stronger fluorescence than the former upon binding the ligand, which is an aggregation-induced emission-active luminogen. The fluorescence signal enhancement is linearly proportional to the RNA methylation extent, which is equivalent to the methylase activity. On the contrary, the m6A demethylase activity is measured through calculating the fluorescence signal decrease caused by the switching from m6A-Pepper to A-Pepper. The assay has been successfully applied to quantitatively evaluate the mutation and inhibitor effects on the activities of m6A methylases METTL3/METTL14 and demethylase FTO, and the obtained results are well-consistent with those quantified by the expensive and time-consuming golden standard LC-MS/MS. Our work provides a simple tool capable of detecting m6A enzymes' activities and screening their inhibitors in a rapid, quantitative, cost-effective, and high-throughput manner.
Detecting m6A methylation regions from Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

Zhenxing Guo,Andrew M Shafik,Peng Jin,Zhijin Wu,Hao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab181

IF: 5.8

2021-03-16

Bioinformatics

Abstract:Abstract Motivation The post-transcriptional epigenetic modification on mRNA is an emerging field to study the gene regulatory mechanism and their association with diseases. Recently developed high-throughput sequencing technology named Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeRIP-seq) enables one to profile mRNA epigenetic modification transcriptome wide. A few computational methods are available to identify transcriptome-wide mRNA modification, but they are either limited by over-simplified model ignoring the biological variance across replicates or suffer from low accuracy and efficiency. Results In this work, we develop a novel statistical method, based on an empirical Bayesian hierarchical model, to identify mRNA epigenetic modification regions from MeRIP-seq data. Our method accounts for various sources of variations in the data through rigorous modeling and applies shrinkage estimation by borrowing information from transcriptome-wide data to stabilize the parameter estimation. Simulation and real data analyses demonstrate that our method is more accurate, robust and efficient than the existing peak calling methods. Availability and implementation Our method TRES is implemented as an R package and is freely available on Github at https://github.com/ZhenxingGuo0015/TRES. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

biochemical research methods,biotechnology & applied microbiology,mathematical & computational biology
Detection Methods of Epitranscriptomic Mark N6-methyladenosine.

Ye Wang,Guifang Jia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/ebc20200039

2020-01-01

Essays in Biochemistry

Abstract:Research on N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in recent years has revealed the complex but elegant regulatory role of this RNA modification in multiple physiological processes. The advent of m6A detection technologies is the basis for studying the function of this RNA modification. These technologies enable the detection of m6A sites across transcriptome or at specific gene, thereby revealing the alternation and dynamic of RNA modification. However, non-specific signals that arise from the antibody-based methods and the low-resolution landscape have become the major drawback of classic m6A detection methods. In this review, we summarize the current available methods and categorized them into three groups according to the utilization purpose, including measurement of total m6A levels, detection m6A locus in single gene, and m6A sequencing. We hope this review helps researchers in epitranscriptomic field find an appropriate m6A detection tool that suites their experimental design.
Identification of differentially methylated single-nucleotide m A sites by incorporating site-specific antibody specificity

Yang Guo,Zehong Wu,Weisheng Cheng,Zhijun Ren,Yixian Cun,Jinkai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.04.578119

2024-02-05

Abstract:Various genome-wide and transcriptome-wide technologies are based on antibodies, however, the specificity of antibodies on different targets has not been characterized or considered in the analyses. The antibody-based MeRIP-seq is the most widely used method to determine the locations of N6-methyladenosine (m A) on RNAs, especially for differential m A analyses. However, the antibody specificities in different RNA regions and their resulting technical biases in differential m A analyses have not been evaluated. Here, we evaluated the m A antibody specificities using 100 pairs of spike-in RNAs with known m A levels at single sites. Based on two replicates with different m A levels on spike-in RNAs, we realized the m A antibody specificities of the m A sites on spike-in RNAs were greatly varied and mainly determined by the surrounding sequences of the m A sites. Moreover, the MeRIP-seq signal fold change is the function of the real difference in m A levels as well as the m A antibody specificity. We then trained a machine learning model to predict the m A antibody specificities of given sequences and predicted the m A specificities of all RNA sequences surrounding the known m A motif DRACH throughout the human transcriptome. Finally, we developed a Hierarchical statistic model for Differential Analysis of m A Sites (HDAMS) by taking advantage of the predicted m A specificities. We found that HDAMS can accurately determine the differentially methylated single-nucleotide m A sites and the output more functionally relevant results. Our study not only provides a powerful tool for differential m A analyses but also provides a methodological framework for other antibody-based studies to incorporate antibody specificities.

Bioinformatics
Mass-Spectrometry-Based Assay at Single-Base Resolution for Simultaneously Detecting M6a and M6am in RNA

Qiang Sun,Haijuan Li,Ziwei Lin,Guodong Cao,Dongzhi Yang,Daoquan Tang,Xi Chen,Yuanjiang Pan,Mengzhe Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04003

IF: 7.4

2024-01-01

Analytical Chemistry

Abstract:The methylation modifications of adenosine, especially N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and N6, 2'-odimethyladenosine (m6Am), play vital roles in various biological, physiological, and pathological processes. However, current methods for detecting these modifications at single-base resolution have limitations. Mass spectrometry (MS), a highly accurate and sensitive technique, can be utilized to differentiate between m6A and m6Am by analyzing the molecular weight differences in their fragments during tandem MS analysis. In this study, we present an MS-based method that allows for the simultaneous determination of m6A and m6Am sites in targeted RNA fragments at single-nucleotide resolution. The approach involves the utilization of tandem MS in conjunction with targeted RNA enrichment and enzymatic digestion, eliminating the need for PCR amplification. By employing this strategy, we can accurately identify m6A and m6Am sites in targeted RNA fragments with high confidence. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we applied it to detect m6A and m6Am sites in cell and tissue samples. Furthermore, we verified the accuracy of our approach by performing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the corresponding methyltransferases. Overall, our MS-based method offers a reliable and precise means for the simultaneous detection of m6A and m6Am modifications in targeted RNA fragments, providing valuable insights into the functional characterization of these modifications in various biological contexts.
magpie : A power evaluation method for differential RNA methylation analysis in N6-methyladenosine sequencing

Zhenxing Guo,Daoyu Duan,Wen Tang,Julia Zhu,William S. Bush,Liangliang Zhang,Xiaofeng Zhu,Fulai Jin,Hao Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011875

2024-02-13

PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract:Recently, novel biotechnologies to quantify RNA modifications became an increasingly popular choice for researchers who study epitranscriptome. When studying RNA methylations such as N6-methyladenosine (m 6 A), researchers need to make several decisions in its experimental design, especially the sample size and a proper statistical power. Due to the complexity and high-throughput nature of m 6 A sequencing measurements, methods for power calculation and study design are still currently unavailable. In this work, we propose a statistical power assessment tool, magpie , for power calculation and experimental design for epitranscriptome studies using m 6 A sequencing data. Our simulation-based power assessment tool will borrow information from real pilot data, and inspect various influential factors including sample size, sequencing depth, effect size, and basal expression ranges. We integrate two modules in magpie : (i) a flexible and realistic simulator module to synthesize m 6 A sequencing data based on real data; and (ii) a power assessment module to examine a set of comprehensive evaluation metrics. Sample size and sequencing depth are two essential quantitative factors determined prior to high throughput sequencing experiments, for statistical power maximization with limited budget. Due to the complex structure of data from m 6 A RNA methylation sequencing, analytical derivations for both quantities remain challenging in experimental designs. In response to this challenge, we propose a simulation-based statistical framework, together with a user-friendly R/Bioconductor package magpie , to comprehensively assess the power of the differential m 6 A methylation detection at varied sample sizes, effect sizes, baseline expression levels, and sequencing depths. Using in-silico synthetic data that mimic real data well, magpie provides several major evaluation metrics to assist users in study design and statistical power evaluation.

biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology
A comprehensive evaluation of computational tools to identify differential methylation regions using RRBS data

Yi Liu,Yi Han,Liyuan Zhou,Xiaoqing Pan,Xiwei Sun,Yong Liu,Mingyu Liang,Jiale Qin,Yan Lu,Pengyuan Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.07.032

IF: 4.31

2020-11-01

Genomics

Abstract:<p>DNA methylation plays a vital role in transcription regulation. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) is becoming common for analyzing genome-wide methylation profiles at the single nucleotide level. A major goal of RRBS studies is to detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between different biological conditions. The previous tools to predict DMRs lack consistency. Here, we simulated RRBS datasets with significant attributes of real sequencing data under a wide range of scenarios, and systematically evaluated seven DMR detection tools in terms of type I error rate, precision/recall (PR), and area under ROC curve (AUC) using different methylation levels, sequencing coverage depth, length of DMRs, read length, and sample sizes. DMRfinder, methylSig, and methylKit were our preferred tools for RRBS data analysis, in terms of their AUC and PR curves. Our comparison highlights the different applicability of DMR detection tools and provides information to guide researchers towards the advancement of sequence-based DMR analysis.</p>

genetics & heredity,biotechnology & applied microbiology
QNB: differential RNA methylation analysis for count-based small-sample sequencing data with a quad-negative binomial model

Lian Liu,Shao-Wu Zhang,Yufei Huang,Jia Meng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1808-4

IF: 3.307

2017-08-31

BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract:BackgroundAs a newly emerged research area, RNA epigenetics has drawn increasing attention recently for the participation of RNA methylation and other modifications in a number of crucial biological processes. Thanks to high throughput sequencing techniques, such as, MeRIP-Seq, transcriptome-wide RNA methylation profile is now available in the form of count-based data, with which it is often of interests to study the dynamics at epitranscriptomic layer. However, the sample size of RNA methylation experiment is usually very small due to its costs; and additionally, there usually exist a large number of genes whose methylation level cannot be accurately estimated due to their low expression level, making differential RNA methylation analysis a difficult task.ResultsWe present QNB, a statistical approach for differential RNA methylation analysis with count-based small-sample sequencing data. Compared with previous approaches such as DRME model based on a statistical test covering the IP samples only with 2 negative binomial distributions, QNB is based on 4 independent negative binomial distributions with their variances and means linked by local regressions, and in the way, the input control samples are also properly taken care of. In addition, different from DRME approach, which relies only the input control sample only for estimating the background, QNB uses a more robust estimator for gene expression by combining information from both input and IP samples, which could largely improve the testing performance for very lowly expressed genes.ConclusionQNB showed improved performance on both simulated and real MeRIP-Seq datasets when compared with competing algorithms. And the QNB model is also applicable to other datasets related RNA modifications, including but not limited to RNA bisulfite sequencing, m1A-Seq, Par-CLIP, RIP-Seq, etc.

biochemical research methods,biotechnology & applied microbiology,mathematical & computational biology
Refined RIP-seq protocol for epitranscriptome analysis with low input materials

Yong Zeng,Shiyan Wang,Shanshan Gao,Fraser Soares,Musadeqque Ahmed,Haiyang Guo,Miranda Wang,Junjie Tony Hua,Jiansheng Guan,Michael F Moran,Ming Sound Tsao,Housheng Hansen He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006092

2018-09-13

Abstract:N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) accounts for approximately 0.2% to 0.6% of all adenosine in mammalian mRNA, representing the most abundant internal mRNA modifications. m6A RNA immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (MeRIP-seq) is a powerful technique to map the m6A location transcriptome-wide. However, this method typically requires 300 μg of total RNA, which limits its application to patient tumors. In this study, we present a refined m6A MeRIP-seq protocol and analysis pipeline that can be applied to profile low-input RNA samples from patient tumors. We optimized the key parameters of m6A MeRIP-seq, including the starting amount of RNA, RNA fragmentation, antibody selection, MeRIP washing/elution conditions, methods for RNA library construction, and the bioinformatics analysis pipeline. With the optimized immunoprecipitation (IP) conditions and a postamplification rRNA depletion strategy, we were able to profile the m6A epitranscriptome using 500 ng of total RNA. We identified approximately 12,000 m6A peaks with a high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio from 2 lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patient tumors. Through integrative analysis of the transcriptome, m6A epitranscriptome, and proteome data in the same patient tumors, we identified dynamics at the m6A level that account for the discordance between mRNA and protein levels in these tumors. The refined m6A MeRIP-seq method is suitable for m6A epitranscriptome profiling in a limited amount of patient tumors, setting the ground for unraveling the dynamics of the m6A epitranscriptome and the underlying mechanisms in clinical settings.
Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm

Bo Zhang,Yan Zhou,Nan Lin,Rebecca F. Lowdon,Chibo Hong,Raman P. Nagarajan,Jeffrey B. Cheng,Daofeng Li,Michael Stevens,Hyung Joo Lee,Xiaoyun Xing,Jia Zhou,Vasavi Sundaram,GiNell Elliott,Junchen Gu,Taoping Shi,Philippe Gascard,Mahvash Sigaroudinia,Thea D. Tlsty,Theresa Kadlecek,Arthur Weiss,Henriette O’Geen,Peggy J. Farnham,Cécile L. Maire,Keith L. Ligon,Pamela A.F. Madden,Angela Tam,Richard Moore,Martin Hirst,Marco A. Marra,Baoxue Zhang,Joseph F. Costello,Ting Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113

IF: 9.438

2013-06-26

Genome Research

Abstract:DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities.

genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
Comparing methylation levels assayed in GC-rich regions with current and emerging methods

Dominic Guanzon,Jason P Ross,Chenkai Ma,Oliver Berry,Yi Jin Liew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.06.556603

2024-01-09

Abstract:DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression, and for mammals typically occurs on cytosines within CpG dinucleotides. A significant challenge for methylation detection methods is accurately measuring methylation levels within GC-rich regions such as gene promoters, as inaccuracies compromise downstream biological interpretation of the data. To address this challenge, we compared methylation levels assayed using four different methods: Enzymatic Methyl-seq (EM-seq), whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS), Infinium arrays (Illumina MethylationEPIC, “EPIC”), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies nanopore sequencing (ONT) applied to human DNA. Overall, all methods produced comparable and consistent methylation readouts across the human genome. The flexibility offered by current gold standard WGBS in interrogating genome-wide cytosines is surpassed technically by both EM-seq and ONT, as their coverages and methylation readouts are less prone to GC bias. These advantages are tempered by increased laboratory time (EM-seq) and higher complexity (ONT). We further assess the strengths and weaknesses of each method, and provide recommendations in choosing the most appropriate methylation method for specific scientific questions or translational needs.

Genomics
Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Zhen-Dong Zhong,Ying-Yuan Xie,Hong-Xuan Chen,Ye-Lin Lan,Xue-Hong Liu,Jing-Yun Ji,Fu Wu,Lingmei Jin,Jiekai Chen,Daniel W. Mak,Zhang Zhang,Guan-Zheng Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37596-5

IF: 16.6

2023-04-05

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been increasingly recognized as a new and important regulator of gene expression. To date, transcriptome-wide m6A detection primarily relies on well-established methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. However, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform has recently emerged as a promising alternative method to study m6A. While multiple computational tools are being developed to facilitate the direct detection of nucleotide modifications, little is known about the capabilities and limitations of these tools. Here, we systematically compare ten tools used for mapping m6A from ONT DRS data. We find that most tools present a trade-off between precision and recall, and integrating results from multiple tools greatly improve performance. Using a negative control could improve precision by subtracting certain intrinsic bias. We also observed variation in detection capabilities and quantitative information among motifs, and identified sequencing depth and m6A stoichiometry as potential factors affecting performance. Our study provides insight into the computational tools currently used for mapping m6A based on ONT DRS data and highlights the potential for further improving these tools, which may serve as the basis for future research.

multidisciplinary sciences
DMseg: a Python algorithm for de novo detection of differentially or variably methylated regions

Xiaoyu Wang,Ming Yu,William Grady,Ziding Feng,Wei Sun,James Y Dai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.15032

2023-06-26

Methodology

Abstract:Detecting and assessing statistical significance of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) is a fundamental task in methylome association studies. While the average differential methylation in different phenotype groups has been the inferential focus, methylation changes in chromosomal regions may also present as differential variability, i.e., variably methylated regions (VMRs). Testing statistical significance of regional differential methylation is a challenging problem, and existing algorithms do not provide accurate type I error control for genome-wide DMR or VMR analysis. No algorithm has been publicly available for detecting VMRs. We propose DMseg, a Python algorithm with efficient DMR/VMR detection and significance assessment for array-based methylome data, and compare its performance to Bumphunter, a popular existing algorithm. Operationally, DMseg searches for DMRs or VMRs within CpG clusters that are adaptively determined by both gap distance and correlation between contiguous CpG sites in a microarray. Levene test was implemented for assessing differential variability of individual CpGs. A likelihood ratio statistic is proposed to test for a constant difference within CpGs in a DMR or VMR to summarize the evidence of regional difference. Using a stratified permutation scheme and pooling null distributions of LRTs from clusters with similar numbers of CpGs, DMseg provides accurate control of the type I error rate. In simulation experiments, DMseg shows superior power than Bumphunter to detect DMRs. Application to methylome data of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma reveals a number of DMRs and VMRs of biological interest.
Comprehensive Review and Assessment of Computational Methods for Prediction of N6-Methyladenosine Sites

Zhengtao Luo,Liyi Yu,Zhaochun Xu,Kening Liu,Lichuan Gu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13100777

2024-09-29

Biology

Abstract:N6-methyladenosine (m6A) plays a crucial regulatory role in the control of cellular functions and gene expression. Recent advances in sequencing techniques for transcriptome-wide m6A mapping have accelerated the accumulation of m6A site information at a single-nucleotide level, providing more high-confidence training data to develop computational approaches for m6A site prediction. However, it is still a major challenge to precisely predict m6A sites using in silico approaches. To advance the computational support for m6A site identification, here, we curated 13 up-to-date benchmark datasets from nine different species (i.e., H. sapiens, M. musculus, Rat, S. cerevisiae, Zebrafish, A. thaliana, Pig, Rhesus, and Chimpanzee). This will assist the research community in conducting an unbiased evaluation of alternative approaches and support future research on m6A modification. We revisited 52 computational approaches published since 2015 for m6A site identification, including 30 traditional machine learning-based, 14 deep learning-based, and 8 ensemble learning-based methods. We comprehensively reviewed these computational approaches in terms of their training datasets, calculated features, computational methodologies, performance evaluation strategy, and webserver/software usability. Using these benchmark datasets, we benchmarked nine predictors with available online websites or stand-alone software and assessed their prediction performance. We found that deep learning and traditional machine learning approaches generally outperformed scoring function-based approaches. In summary, the curated benchmark dataset repository and the systematic assessment in this study serve to inform the design and implementation of state-of-the-art computational approaches for m6A identification and facilitate more rigorous comparisons of new methods in the future.

biology
Identifying RNA N6-Methyladenine Sites in Three Species Based on a Markov Model

Cong Pian,Zhixin Yang,Yuqian Yang,Liangyun Zhang,Yuanyuan Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.650803

IF: 3.7

2021-03-19

Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract:N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most common posttranscriptional modification in eukaryotic mRNAs, plays an important role in mRNA splicing, editing, stability, degradation, etc. Since the methylation state is dynamic, methylation sequencing needs to be carried out over different time periods, which brings some difficulties to identify the RNA methyladenine sites. Thus, it is necessary to develop a fast and accurate method to identify the RNA N6-methyladenosine sites in the transcriptome. In this study, we use first-order and second-order Markov models to identify RNA N6-methyladenine sites in three species ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae , mouse, and Homo sapiens ). These two methods can fully consider the correlation between adjacent nucleotides. The results show that the performance of our method is better than that of other existing methods. Furthermore, the codons encoded by three nucleotides have biases in mRNA, and a second-order Markov model can capture this kind of information exactly. This may be the main reason why the performance of the second-order Markov model is better than that of the first-order Markov model in the m6A prediction problem. In addition, we provide a corresponding web tool called MM-m6APred.

genetics & heredity
Sequencing-free Analysis of Multiple Methylations on Gene-Specific mRNAs

Xi Zhao,Xianglin Ji,Jin Qu,Kai Xie,Zixun Wang,Peilin Fang,Yuan Wang,Youyang Wan,Yang Yang,Wenjun Zhang,Peng Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01036

IF: 15

2022-03-23

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract:RNA epigenetics is a new layer of mechanism to regulate gene expression, but limited techniques are available to profile the status of mRNA modifications. Here, we describe a molecule proximity-based technique for simultaneous analysis of multiple types of mRNA methylation with specific gene information in living cells. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) or N1-methyladenosine (m1A) modifications on multiple mRNAs can be individually or simultaneously analyzed. A chip fabricated with vertically aligned, high-aspect-ratio diamond nanoneedles was used to access the intracellular domain in a minimum-invasive format and to isolate the mRNAs out of the cell cytoplasm while keeping cells alive. In the subsequent on-chip analytical procedures, the isolated RNAs were encoded, amplified, and visualized to derive a quantitative measurement of the associated gene-specific m6A or m1A modifications. Notably, a proximity ligation approach was developed to resolve dual methylation on an individual mRNA segment. Using this method, we investigated the dynamics of mRNA methylation in mammalian cells under physical or chemical stimuli and showed that m6A and m1A in mRNAs are heavily involved in the cellular stress response. Our results also suggested the common existence of single m6A modification in the basigin (BSG) mRNA but a rare occurrence of m6A and m1A dual methylation in the same BSG transcript.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.2c01036.Materials and methods; images of the diamond nanoneedle chip; exploration of the centrifugation time for molecular fishing of m6A mRNA; signal amplification of the m6A or m1A mRNA with the HCR; determination of optimal cluster numbers of consensus clustering; profiling of m6A-mRNA in the cellular heat-shock response; characterization of quench efficiency for different Fork-fluor complexes; optimization of the antibody concentration for nanoneedle functionalization; and sequence information (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

chemistry, multidisciplinary
Advanced Sequencing Techniques to Map RNA Methylation

Ge‐Ge Song,Xiu Fan,Chun‐Chun Gao,Yong‐Liang Zhao,Yun‐Gui Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.202400003

2024-04-28

Israel Journal of Chemistry

Abstract:RNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic modification widely present in RNA molecules, and has been demonstrated to play significant roles in diverse biological processes. Advances in detection and sequencing technologies have facilitated the identification of RNA modification‐related regulatory proteins and their corresponding biological functions. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of several RNA methylation, including N6‐methyladenosine(m6A), 5‐methylcytidine(m5C), N1‐methyladenosine(m1A), N7‐methylguanosine(m7G) and N6, 2'‐O‐dimethyladenosine(m6Am), about their regulatory proteins, distribution patterns and biological functions, and mainly outline the advantages and limitations of the representative sequencing techniques. Finally, we discuss the technological challenges and future perspectives in RNA transcriptomic field.

chemistry, multidisciplinary
Corrigendum: Bilirubin Increases Insulin Sensitivity by Regulating Cholesterol Metabolism, Adipokines and PPARγ Levels

Jinfeng Liu,Huansheng Dong,Yong Zhang,Mingjun Cao,Lili Song,Qingjie Pan,A. Bulmer,D. Adams,Xiao Dong,Hongjun Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19170

IF: 4.6

2016-01-20

Scientific Reports

Abstract:

Microbiota in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Differential RNA Methylation Analysis for MeRIP-seq Data under General Experimental Design

Mapping Messenger RNA Methylations at Single Base Resolution

An RNA Methylation-Sensitive AIEgen-Aptamer Reporting System for Quantitatively Evaluating M6a Methylase and Demethylase Activities

Detecting m6A methylation regions from Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

Detection Methods of Epitranscriptomic Mark N6-methyladenosine.

Identification of differentially methylated single-nucleotide m A sites by incorporating site-specific antibody specificity

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Assay at Single-Base Resolution for Simultaneously Detecting M6a and M6am in RNA

magpie : A power evaluation method for differential RNA methylation analysis in N6-methyladenosine sequencing

A comprehensive evaluation of computational tools to identify differential methylation regions using RRBS data

QNB: differential RNA methylation analysis for count-based small-sample sequencing data with a quad-negative binomial model

Refined RIP-seq protocol for epitranscriptome analysis with low input materials

Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm

Comparing methylation levels assayed in GC-rich regions with current and emerging methods

Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

DMseg: a Python algorithm for de novo detection of differentially or variably methylated regions

Comprehensive Review and Assessment of Computational Methods for Prediction of N6-Methyladenosine Sites

Identifying RNA N6-Methyladenine Sites in Three Species Based on a Markov Model

Sequencing-free Analysis of Multiple Methylations on Gene-Specific mRNAs

Advanced Sequencing Techniques to Map RNA Methylation

Corrigendum: Bilirubin Increases Insulin Sensitivity by Regulating Cholesterol Metabolism, Adipokines and PPARγ Levels