Abstract:Purpose: Addressing trapezio-metacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis often involves considering TMC joint replacement. Utilizing TMC prostheses offers advantages such as preserving the thumb length and more accurately replicating the thumb's range of motion (ROM). TMC prostheses have an intrinsic risk of dislocation and aseptic loosening. Analyzing pre- and postoperative imaging can mitigate complications and improve prosthetic placement, providing insights into both successes and potential challenges, refining overall clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 30 patients with severe TMC arthritis treated with a Touch© (Kerimedical, Geneva, Switzerland) prosthesis in 2021–2023: X-ray and CT protocols were developed to analyze A) the correct prosthesis placement and B) its correlation with clinical outcomes (VAS, Kapandji and QuickDASH scores) by performing Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The average differences in trapezium height and M1-M2 ratio pre- and post-surgery were, respectively, 1.8 mm (SD ± 1.7; p < 0.001) and 0.04 mm (SD ± 0.04; p = 0.017). Pre-to-postoperative M1 axis length increased by an average of 2.98 mm (SD ± 3.84; p = 0.017). Trapezial cup sinking, indicated by the trapezium index, measured 4.6 mm (SD ± 1.2). The metacarpal index averaged at 11.3 mm (SD ± 3.3). The distance between the centers of the trapezium distal surface and the prosthesis cup was 2.23 mm (SD ± 1.4). The Spearman correlation analysis gave the following results: negative correlations were highlighted between postoperative VAS scores and the M1/M2 ratio and residual trapezium height (correlation coefficient: −0.7, p = 0.03 and −0.064, p = 0.03, respectively) at 6 months; a negative correlation was found at the 3-month mark between QuickDASH and the trapezium residual height (correlation coefficient: −0.07, p = 0.01); and a positive correlation was found for the trapezium index at 1 month (correlation coefficient: 0.07, p = 0.03) and 3 months (p = 0.04) using the Kapandji score. Similarly, we found a positive correlation between the distance between the prosthesis and trapezium centers and QuickDASH score at 1 and 3 months (correlation coefficient: 0.066, p = 0.03; correlation coefficient: 0.07, p = 0.05, respectively) and a positive correlation between prosthesis axis and the residual first metacarpal angle with QuickDASH score at 3 months (correlation coefficient: 0.07, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Pre- and postoperative systematic imaging analysis should become a method for predicting complications and guiding recovery in TMC prosthesis: CT imaging could provide us with radiographical landmarks that are intrinsically linked to clinical outcomes. Further research is necessary to fuel a protocol for the correct intraoperative TMC prosthesis implantation.

Analysis of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis cup position with respect to the trapezial anatomy

Influence of the anatomy of the proximal articular surface of the trapezium (PAST) and the trapezoidal articular surface of the trapezium (TRAST) in cup placement during trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

Computer-simulated TOUCH prosthesis cup malposition and solutions

Proposed Radiographic Parameters to Optimize Clinical Outcomes in Trapezio-Metacarpal Prosthesis Placement Using CT Imaging, with 1-Year Follow-Up

Superior bone fixation of conical compared with hemispherical trapezial cup design: an experimental radiostereometry study

Position of the Prosthesis and the Incidence of Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement

Scaphometacarpal arthroplasty with a TOUCH® prosthesis: feasibility and biomechanical impact in a cadaver model

Automated analysis of trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics using four-dimensional computed tomography

Interposition Arthroplasty versus Dual Cup Mobility Prosthesis in Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Study

Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA

Development of an implantable trapezium carpal bone replacement for measuring in vivo loads at the base of the thumb

Accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty by means of a mechanical positioning device: a comprehensive cadaveric 3d analysis of 16 specimens

PROSTHETIC CUP ORIENTATION IS MORE PRECISE IN THE ANTERIOR APPROACH VERSUS THE TRANSGLUTEAL APPROACH

Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

Is transverse acetabular ligament an anatomical landmark to reliably orient the cup in primary total hip arthroplasty?

De Quervain's tendinitis after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

Validation of a New Method for Determination of Cup Orientation in THA.

Evaluation of the Feasibility of Acetabular Cup Pre-Determination in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Via X-ray of the Bone Stock of the Anterosuperior Acetabulum

Comparative Analysis of Prosthetic (Touch) and Arthroplastic Surgeries for Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis: Functional Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With a 2-Year Follow-Up

Do the porous custom implants have a position consistent with the planning and allow anatomical reconstruction of hip center of rotation in complex acetabular revisions Paprosky III?

A995. ACCURACY OF CT-BASED COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY