Comparative Study on the Macroscopic Exploitation and Microscopic Mobilization Characteristics of CO 2 and N 2 HnP to Enhance Shale Oil Recovery

Feng Liu,Yong Kang,Mengda Zhang,Yi Hu,Yong Huang,Lian Li,Haizeng Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00507
IF: 4.6541
2024-03-26
Energy & Fuels
Abstract:Gas huff and puff (HnP) is one of the means to improve shale oil recovery, and the commonly used gases are CO2 and N2. However, the current research on CO2 and N2 HnP enhancing shale oil recovery is not sufficient. This study compares the macroscopic exploitation and microscopic mobilization characteristics of CO2 and N2 HnP by the HnP experiments with a full-diameter core, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) tests, and online nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests. Moreover, the impact of cycle number on the oil recovery efficiency of HnP is analyzed. The results show that CO2 HnP achieves a 7.23% higher final oil recovery factor (ORF) compared to N2 HnP and CO2 has a stronger injection capacity. Moreover, CO2 has a better extraction ability, and the CO2 HnP process can realize the storage of CO2. Furthermore, the lower limit of pore mobilization for CO2 HnP is significantly lower, and the final ORF from micropores during CO2 HnP is 20.98% higher than that during N2 HnP. In summary, CO2 HnP has a stronger recovery effect compared to N2 HnP. As the cycle number grows, the incremental ORF decreases, while the growth rate of cumulative ORF slows down, and the produced gas–oil ratio (GOR) rises rapidly. Meanwhile, the gas injection volume increases and the gas–oil exchange ratio decreases. These indicate that the oil recovery effect and economic efficiency of HnP deteriorate with an increase in the cycle number.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?