The GERB Obs4MIPs Radiative Flux Dataset: A new tool for climate model evaluation

Jacqueline Elizabeth Russell,Richard John Bantges,Helen Elizabeth Brindley,Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-4
IF: 11.4
2024-02-24
Earth System Science Data
Abstract:A new radiative flux dataset, specifically designed to enable the evaluation of the diurnal cycle in top of the atmosphere fluxes, as captured by climate and Earth-system models is presented. Observations over the period 2007–2012 made by the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument are used to derive monthly hourly mean reflected shortwave (RSW) and outgoing longwave fluxes (OLR) on a regular 1°x1° latitude-longitude grid covering 60° N–60° S and 60° E–60° W. The impact of missing data is evaluated in detail, and a data-filling solution is implemented using estimates of the broadband fluxes from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager, flying on the same Meteosat platform, scaled to the GERB observations. This relatively simple approach is shown to deliver an approximate factor of ten improvement in both the bias caused by missing data and the associated variability in the error. To demonstrate the utility of this GERB 'obs4MIPs' dataset, comparisons are made to radiative fluxes from two climate configurations of the Hadley Centre Global Environmental model: HadGEM3-GC3.1 and HadGEM3-GC5.0. Focusing on marine stratocumulus and deep convective cloud regimes, diurnally resolved comparisons between the model and observations highlight discrepancies between the model configurations in terms of their ability to capture the diurnal amplitude and phase of the top of atmosphere fluxes: details that cannot be diagnosed by comparisons at lower temporal resolution. For these cloud regimes the GC5.0 configuration shows improved fidelity with the observations although notable differences remain. The GERB Obs4MIPs monthly hourly TOA fluxes are available from the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis with the OLR fluxes accessible at https://doi.org/10.5285/90148d9b1f1c40f1ac40152957e25467 (Bantges et al. 2023a) and the RSW fluxes at https://doi.org/10.5285/57821b58804945deaf4cdde278563ec2 (Bantges et al. 2023b).
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?