Impact of Grating Duty-Cycle Randomness on DFB Laser Performance

Manpo Yang,Xiangpeng Kong,Xun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11060574

IF: 2.536

2024-06-19

Photonics

Abstract:The duty-cycle randomness (DCR) of the Bragg grating of the distributed feedback (DFB) lasers introduced by the fabrication process is inevitable, even with state-of-the-art technologies such as electron beam lithography and dry or wet etching.This work investigates the impact of grating DCR on DFB laser performance through numerical simulations. The result reveals that such randomness causes a reduction in the side mode suppression ratio (SMSR), and deteriorates the noise characteristics, i.e., broadens the linewidth and increases the relative intensity noise (RIN). With the grating DCR, the effective grating coupling coefficient decreases as evidenced by the reduced Bragg stopband width. However, the longitudinal spatial hole burning (LSHB) effect in the DFB lasers can somewhat be diminished by the grating DCR. The seriousness of these effects depends on different grating structures and their coupling strengths. Our simulation shows that a degradation of 17 dB can be brought to the SMSR of the uniform grating DFB lasers with their duty cycles taking a deviation of ±25% in a uniformly distributed random fashion. It also broadens the linewidth of the quarter-wavelength phase-shifted DFB lasers by more than 2.5 folds. The impact of this effect on the RIN is moderate—less than 2%. All the performance deteriorations can partially be attributed to the effective reduction in the grating coupling coefficient of around 20% by such a DCR.

optics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the impact of grating duty cycle randomness (DCR) on the performance of distributed feedback (DFB) lasers. Specifically, the paper investigates how the randomness in the grating duty cycle, caused by imperfections in the manufacturing process, affects key performance metrics of DFB lasers through numerical simulation methods.

The main findings of the paper include:

1. **Side Mode Suppression Ratio (SMSR) Decrease**: DCR significantly reduces the side mode suppression ratio of the laser. For uniform grating DFB lasers, when the duty cycle varies randomly within the range of ±25%, the SMSR may decrease by about 17 dB; for quarter-wavelength phase-shifted DFB lasers, the SMSR decreases by about 3 dB.

2. **Linewidth Broadening**: DCR also causes the linewidth of the laser to broaden. For uniform grating DFB lasers, the linewidth may increase by about 40%; for quarter-wavelength phase-shifted DFB lasers, the linewidth may increase by more than 2.5 times.

3. **Relative Intensity Noise (RIN) Increase**: The impact of DCR on RIN is relatively mild, usually increasing by no more than 2%.

4. **Effective Coupling Coefficient Reduction**: DCR reduces the effective coupling coefficient of the grating by about 20%, which further leads to a decrease in the Bragg stopband width.

5. **Longitudinal Spatial Hole Burning (LSHB) Effect Weakening**: Although DCR leads to performance degradation, it also partially alleviates the LSHB effect in DFB lasers.

The paper employs an improved transfer matrix model (TMM) capable of handling minor variations within the grating period and validates the simulation results by comparing them with existing models to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the authors study the performance differences of DFB lasers with different structures (such as uniform gratings and quarter-wavelength phase-shifted gratings) and different coupling strengths in the presence of DCR. These findings are significant for understanding the impact of DCR on DFB laser performance and provide guidance for designing high-performance DFB lasers.