Abstract:Purpose In many countries, small and medium-sizes enterprises (SMEs) are primarily responsible for wealth, economic growth, innovation and research and development. In this paper, the authors examine the impact of family ownership and owner involvement on the financial performance of unlisted Finnish SMEs. Design/methodology/approach This is an empirical paper using a random sample of 1,137 non-listed Finnish SMEs. Through regression analyses and robustness tests, the authors examine the effects of family management, family and employee ownership and involvement. Findings Using profitability measures, the authors find family-owned and controlled SMEs perform significantly better than non-family firms. The number of family members actively involved in daily business operations bears a significant negative relation to firm performance. In contrast, non-family firms in which owners are actively involved, provide comparable returns to family firms, suggesting that in non-family firms active involvement contributes to performance. The authors find that employee ownership in SMEs does not provide an efficient way to compensate employees since more dispersed ownership does not lead to higher performance. Research limitations/implications SME employee ownership does not provide an efficient way to compensate employees since more dispersed ownership does not lead to higher performance. Practical implications In the case of Finland, family ownership is an effective organisational structure. As the depth of the COVID pandemic remains uncertain, firms with committed ownership are key to the economic recovery. Originality/value The authors approach the family ownership and involvement issue from a different angle. Unlike earlier studies, the authors examine the impact of both family ownership and involvement on the financial performance of privately owned SMEs. This paper helps shed light on the role of family ownership and involvement as a possible explanatory factor of overall economic performance.

Franchise ownership types and noneconomic performance among quick service restaurants: do family operated franchises receive fewer health code violations?

Family Firms, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Zhejiang

Does familial decision control affect the entrepreneurial orientation of family firms? The moderating role of family relationships

When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? the Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation

Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: the Roles of Family Commitment and Long-Term Orientation

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

'Ugly Princess': Self-Enforcement in Franchising

MULTIPLE-UNIT FRANCHISING AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES

Does Family Meet Its Affective Need by Owning and Operating Business in Socioemotional Wealth Ways?

The Effects of Franchising on Stores, Competitors, and Consumers

Turning aligned interests into higher chain performance in franchising

Chain Affiliation and Human Resource Investments: Evidence from the Restaurant Industry

CEO Overconfidence and the Effects of Equity-Based Compensation on Strategic Risk-Taking in the U.S. Restaurant Industry

Encouraging Non-Family Employee Voice in Family Firm: the Role Model Effect of Owning Family

Do financial constraints affect the sensitivity of investment to cash flow? New evidence from franchised restaurant firms

Sustainable Operations of Online and Offline Restaurants: Focusing on Multi-Brand Restaurants

Reputational risk and firm performance: Family versus nonfamily firms in different regulatory environments

Perceived organizational justice in family SMEs: The challenge of HRM consistency

Family firm competitiveness and owner involvement

Ownership succession intentions affecting earnings management in private family firms