Abstract:Purpose In many countries, small and medium-sizes enterprises (SMEs) are primarily responsible for wealth, economic growth, innovation and research and development. In this paper, the authors examine the impact of family ownership and owner involvement on the financial performance of unlisted Finnish SMEs. Design/methodology/approach This is an empirical paper using a random sample of 1,137 non-listed Finnish SMEs. Through regression analyses and robustness tests, the authors examine the effects of family management, family and employee ownership and involvement. Findings Using profitability measures, the authors find family-owned and controlled SMEs perform significantly better than non-family firms. The number of family members actively involved in daily business operations bears a significant negative relation to firm performance. In contrast, non-family firms in which owners are actively involved, provide comparable returns to family firms, suggesting that in non-family firms active involvement contributes to performance. The authors find that employee ownership in SMEs does not provide an efficient way to compensate employees since more dispersed ownership does not lead to higher performance. Research limitations/implications SME employee ownership does not provide an efficient way to compensate employees since more dispersed ownership does not lead to higher performance. Practical implications In the case of Finland, family ownership is an effective organisational structure. As the depth of the COVID pandemic remains uncertain, firms with committed ownership are key to the economic recovery. Originality/value The authors approach the family ownership and involvement issue from a different angle. Unlike earlier studies, the authors examine the impact of both family ownership and involvement on the financial performance of privately owned SMEs. This paper helps shed light on the role of family ownership and involvement as a possible explanatory factor of overall economic performance.

Ownership succession intentions affecting earnings management in private family firms

Bequeath to Relatives or Hand Over to Professional Manager——A Survey of Zhejiang Family Enterprise's Take-over

Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Hiring a Family CEO or a Non-family CEO? Research on the CEO Successor Choice Based on Heterogeneous Goals of Controlling Families

When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? the Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation

Factors That Influence Offspring Intentions To Join The Family Businesses: Evidence From Zhejiang, China

The Boss Behind the Scenes: Nonfamily Leadership and Earnings Management

Individual Propensity,Family's Commitment and the Extent of Succession Planning

Family oblige: the link between CSR and succession intention in small and medium family firms

The impact of parental emotional support on the succession intentions of next-generation family business members

Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession

The Impact of Management Succession on Corporate Social Responsibility of Chinese Family Firms: The Moderating Effects of Managerial Economic Motivations

Successful family firm succession: Transferring external social capital to a shared-leadership team of siblings

Ownership Structure and Eco-Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Family Firms

Family Firm Governance and Financial Policy Choices in Newly Public Firms

Family firm competitiveness and owner involvement

Founding-family-controlled firms, intergenerational succession, and firm value

Family firm succession and corporate philanthropy: evidence based on internal legitimacy and external relationship-specific assets

Family Ownership and CEO Turnovers

Owner Offspring Gender and Long‐term Resource Allocation in Chinese Family Firms

Management and ownership transfer in small and medium family farms