Abstract:The heat transfer of a slab is significantly influenced by roll contact during the continuous casting process. The influence of roll contact calculation methods on the predicted heat transfer results has not been previously investigated. In this work, the non-uniform solidification of the wide-thick slab was studied with a 2D heat transfer model using real roll contact method (R. method) and equivalent roll contact method (E. method). The predicted slab surface temperature and shell thickness were verified with the measured results of the infrared camera and nail shooting experiments, respectively. Then, the predicted heat transfer results (including the slab surface temperature, mushy region length, and solidification end position) for the wide-thick slab with different thicknesses and different casting speeds were calculated using the E. method and R. method, and the influence of these two roll contact methods on the predicted heat transfer results was discussed for the first time. The results show that both these two roll contact methods could be applied to accurately predict the slab surface temperature without considering the transient temperature dips in the roll–slab contact regions. However, the deviation of the predicted mushy region length and solidification end position using the E. method are obvious. Compared with the R. method, the predicted mushy region length obtained using the E. method is larger and the solidification end obviously subsequently moves along the casting direction.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the influence of different roll - contact calculation methods on the prediction results of heat transfer during the solidification of wide - thick plates in the continuous casting process. Specifically, by establishing a two - dimensional heat transfer model and using the actual roll - contact method (R. method) and the equivalent roll - contact method (E. method), the researchers studied the heat transfer behavior during the solidification of wide - thick plates under non - uniform cooling conditions. They focused on the differences between these two methods in predicting the slab surface temperature, the length of the semi - solid region, and the end position of solidification, in order to provide a theoretical basis for selecting an appropriate roll - contact calculation method, so that relevant heat transfer results can be calculated more accurately and quickly when optimizing certain process parameters.
### Research Background
During the continuous casting process, the heat of the molten steel is removed successively in the mold, the secondary cooling zone, and the air - cooling zone, which is crucial for the quality and productivity of the cast steel. Many researchers have used numerical calculation methods to study the heat transfer behavior of cast steel to optimize cooling and other process parameters. For example, based on the predicted slab surface temperature and the target temperature, the cooling water volume or the nozzle arrangement in the secondary cooling zone is optimized to eliminate the transverse cracks on the slab surface; according to the predicted characteristics of the semi - solid region and the end position of solidification, the reasonable position for implementing electromagnetic stirring (S/F - EMS) or soft/heavy reduction (S/HR) is determined to effectively improve internal defects such as center - line segregation and porosity.
### Influence of Roll Contact
As one of the main cooling methods after the mold, roll contact removes approximately 10% of the heat of the cast steel, thus significantly affecting the heat transfer of the cast steel. In previous studies, two main calculation methods have been used to deal with the cooling boundary conditions between the roll and the slab: the equivalent roll - contact method (E. method) and the actual roll - contact method (R. method). The E. method assumes that all the heat extracted through roll contact is released evenly in the casting direction, while the R. method applies the cooling boundary conditions within each roll - slab contact area.
### Research Method
The researchers selected peritectic steel plates produced by a commercial wide - thick continuous caster as the research objects. Based on some simplified assumptions, a quarter of the slab cross - section was selected as the calculation domain, and a two - dimensional heat transfer model was established. The model was discretized using four - node rectangular elements, with a mesh size of 2 mm × 2 mm and a time step of 0.2 seconds. The accuracy of the model was verified by measuring the slab surface temperature and the shell thickness through an infrared camera and a pin - shooting experiment.
### Main Findings
The research results show that both the R. method and the E. method can accurately predict the slab surface temperature, but the E. method has obvious deviations in predicting the length of the semi - solid region and the end position of solidification. Compared with the R. method, the E. method predicts a longer length of the semi - solid region, and the end position of solidification is obviously shifted in the casting direction.
### Conclusion
The research results indicate that in cases where accurate prediction of the length of the semi - solid region and the end position of solidification is required, the actual roll - contact method (R. method) should be preferentially selected, although its calculation cost is relatively high. This provides an important theoretical basis for optimizing the cooling parameters in the continuous casting process.