Abstract:Objective: Social media is part of current health communications. This research aims to delve into the effects of social contagion, biased assimilation, and homophily in building and changing health opinions on social media. Materials and methods: Conversations about COVID-19 vaccination on English and Spanish Twitter are the case studies. A new multilayered graph-based framework supports the integrated analysis of content similarity within and across posts, users, and conversations to interpret contrasting and confluent user stances. Deep learning models are applied to infer stance. Graph centrality and homophily scores support the interpretation of information reproduction. Results: The results show that semantically related English posts tend to present a similar stance about COVID-19 vaccination (rstance = 0.51) whereas Spanish posts are more heterophilic (rstance = 0.38). Neither case showed evidence of homophily regarding user influence or vaccine hashtags. Graph filters for Pfizer and Astrazeneca with a similarity threshold of 0.85 show stance homophily in English scenarios (i.e. rstance = 0.45 and rstance = 0.58, respectively) and small homophily in Spanish scenarios (i.e. r = 0.12 and r = 0.3, respectively). Highly connected users are a minority and are not socially influential. Spanish conversations showed stance homophily, i.e. most of the connected conversations promote vaccination (rstance = 0.42), whereas English conversations are more likely to offer contrasting stances. Conclusion: The methodology proposed for quantifying the impact of natural and intentional social behaviours in health information reproduction can be applied to any of the main social platforms and any given topic of conversation. Its effectiveness was demonstrated by two case studies describing English and Spanish demographic and sociocultural scenarios.

Unveiling the hidden face of discrimination: understanding the triggers of countering and spreading discriminatory memes on social networks

Polarization, virality and contrary sentiments for LGTB content on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter

Digital destigmatization: How exposure to networking profiles can reduce social stereotypes

'You Got My Back?' Severity and Counter-Speech in Online Hate Speech Toward Minority Groups

A multilayered graph-based framework to explore behavioural phenomena in social media conversations

Preventing Prejudice Emerging from Misleading News among Adolescents: The Role of Implicit Activation and Regulatory Self-Efficacy in Dealing with Online Misinformation

Examining the Unique Online Risk Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes of LGBTQ+ versus Heterosexual Youth

Online Disinhibition and Online Trolling Among Chinese College Students: The Mediation of the Dark Triad and the Moderation of Gender

Too civil to care? How online hate speech against different social groups affects bystander intervention

Advancing E-contact to Reduce Intergroup Anxiety and Increase Positive Attitudes Towards Individuals Who Identify as Bisexual

Dispositional mindfulness and the nonjudgmental regard towards others: the role on sexual prejudice and transphobia among cisgender heterosexual people

Observers of social media discussions about racial discrimination condemn denial but also adopt it

Mapping Homophobia and Transphobia on Social Media

Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users

Exploring the De-Stigmatizing Effect of Social Media on Homosexuality in China: an Interpersonal-Mediated Contact Versus Parasocial-Mediated Contact Perspective

An Overview of Prevalence and Behavioral Responses

Impact and dynamics of hate and counter speech online

The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study

When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice

Effectiveness of dismantling strategies on moderated vs. unmoderated online social platforms