Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of the X-Tack Endoscopic HeliX Tacking System
Andrew Canakis,Sanad Maher Dawod,Enad Dawod,Malorie Simons,Bianca Di Cocco,Donevan Richard Westerveld,Roberto Paolo Trasolini,Tyler M Berzin,Christopher A Marshall,Ahmed Maher Abdelfattah,Neil B Marya,George B Smallfield,Matthew Kaspar,Guilherme M Campos,Wasseem Skef,Prashant Kedia,Terrence A Smith,Hiroyuki Aihara,Matthew T Moyer,Kartik Sampath,Srihari Mahadev,David L Carr-Locke,Reem Z Sharaiha,Tyler M. Berzin,Christopher A. Marshall,Neil B. Marya,George B. Smallfield,Guilherme M. Campos,Terrence A. Smith,Matthew T. Moyer,David L. Carr-Locke,Reem Z. Sharaiha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001977
2024-01-29
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Abstract:Background and Aims: The application of endoscopic suturing has revolutionized defect closures. Conventional over-the-scope suturing necessitates removal of the scope, placement of the device, and reinsertion. A single channel, single sequence, through-the-scope suturing device has been developed to improve this process. This study aims to describe the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of a through-the-scope suturing device for gastrointestinal defect closure. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 9 centers of consecutive adult patients who underwent suturing using the X-Tack Endoscopic HeliX Tacking System (Apollo Endosurgery). The primary outcomes were technical success and long-term clinical success. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, recurrence, and reintervention rates. Results: In all, 56 patients (mean age 53.8, 33 women) were included. Suturing indications included fistula repair (n=22), leak repair (n=7), polypectomy defect closure (n=12), peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) site closure (n=7), perforation repair (n=6), and ulcers (n=2). Patients were followed at a mean duration of 74 days. Overall technical and long-term clinical success rates were 92.9% and 75%, respectively. Both technical and clinical success rates were 100% for polypectomies, POEM-site closures, and ulcers. Success rates were lower for the repair of fistulas (95.5% technical, 54.5% clinical), leaks (57.1%, 28.6%), and perforations (100%, 66.7%). No immediate adverse events were noted. Conclusion: This novel, through-the-scope endoscopic suturing system, is a safe and feasible method to repair defects that are ≤3 cm. The efficacy of this device may be better suited for superficial defects as opposed to full-thickness defects. Larger defects will need more sutures and probably a double closure technique to provide a reinforcement layer.
gastroenterology & hepatology