A Novel, Wearable Inertial Measurement Unit for Stroke Survivors: Validity, Acceptability, and Usability

Lauri Bishop,Marika Demers,Justin Rowe,Daniel Zondervan,Carolee J Winstein,Carolee J. Winstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.020
IF: 4.06
2024-03-08
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Abstract:Objective To establish the concurrent validity, acceptability, and sensor optimization of a consumer-grade, wearable, multi-sensor system to capture quantity and quality metrics of mobility and upper limb movements in stroke survivors. Design Single-session, cross-sectional. Setting Clinical research laboratory. Participants Thirty chronic stroke survivors (age 57 (10) years; 33% female) with mild to severe motor impairments participated. Interventions Not Applicable. Main Outcome Measures Participants donned 5 sensors and performed standardized assessments of mobility and upper limb (UL) movement. True/false, positive/negative time in active movement for the UL were calculated and compared to criterion-standards using an accuracy rate. Bland-Altman plots and linear regression models were used to establish concurrent validity of UL movement counts, step counts, and stance time symmetry of MiGo against established criterion-standard measures. Acceptability and sensor optimization were assessed through an end-user survey and decision matrix. Results Mobility metrics showed excellent association with criterion-standards for step counts (video: r =0.988, P <.001, IMU: r =0.921, P <.001) and stance-time symmetry ( r =0.722, P <.001). In the UL, movement counts showed excellent to good agreement (paretic: r =0.849, P <.001, nonparetic: r =0.672, P <.001). Accuracy of active movement time was 85.2% (paretic) and 88.0% (nonparetic) UL. Most participants (63.3%) had difficulty donning/doffing the sensors. Acceptability was high (4.2/5). Conclusions The sensors demonstrated excellent concurrent validity for mobility metrics and UL movements of stroke survivors. Acceptability of the system was high, but alternative wristbands should be considered.
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?