A case of allele “drop‐in”

C. Sweatt,J. Mead

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33193142317.x

1993-01-01

Transfusion

Abstract:To the Editor: The development and use of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) testing has greatly aided resolution of disputed parentage cases.’ RFLP analysis relies on the presence of a variable number of tandem repeat sequences found in human genomic DNA and DNA probes that identify closely linked regions. Since the introduction of this technology, many loci have been identified and characterized as to the range of fragment sizes observed.Z On the basis of these results, protocols were established that call for trimming the electrophoretic gel to a specific size before Southern blotting to conserve both probe and reagents. The location of these trimming cuts is dependent on the known migration characteristics of the locus to be identified and the restriction enzyme employed. During a determination of paternity in a case received in our DNA testing laboratory, we discovered that the standard method of trimming gels results in the loss of larger fragments for locus DlS47 (probe pL336). A blood sample, drawn at the time of autopsy from a decedent white alleged father, was received from the local coroner’s office. This sodium fluoridepreserved sample was approximately 4 weeks old when received. DNA from this specimen and from ACD samples from the mother and child was extracted, restricted with Pst I, and electrophoresed at 1.8 V per cm in an 0.8-percent agarose gel in TrisiborateEDTA buffer at pH 8.3. To prepare the gel for Southern blotting, the gel was trimmed for locus DlS47 (probe pL336) according to the specifications3 of the manufacturer (Collaborative Research Incorporated, Bedford, MA). The DNA was transferred to a charged nylon membrane by neutral Southem