Abstract:It has been increasingly recognized that entrepreneurship plays a crucial role in successful economies. The Schumpeterian approach to growth (Aghion and Howitt, 1997) advances the view that entrepreneurial dynamism is the key to innovation and growth. A growing body of policy work emphasizes the important role of entrepreneurs in economic development (World Bank, 2003). Yet, research on entrepreneurship in economics is rather limited. There are three distinct perspectives on entrepreneurship in social sciences. The first perspective focuses on the role of economic, political, and legal institutions in fostering or restricting entrepreneurship. Institutional problems are seen in credit constraints that make it impossible to borrow and set up businesses; insecurity of property rights that provides insufficient incentives for entrepreneurs; and regulatory burdens that make setting up new enterprises difficult. The second perspective focuses on the sociological variables shaping entrepreneurship. For example, sociologists study the role of values and social networks in promoting or discouraging entrepreneurial activities. Social networks may work through a variety of channels, such as family, friends, or ethnic groups. The third perspective emphasizes individual characteristics of entrepreneurs. Psychologists have studied the traits associated with entrepreneurship - such as a personal need for achievement, belief in the effect of personal effort on outcomes, attitudes towards risk, and individual self-confidence. Although there are studies on each perspective, little work looks at each of these factors taking the other into account. This is precisely what we do in this paper, using a new data set of Chinese entrepreneurs and a matching sample of non-entrepreneurs with similar age, gender and educational characteristics. The survey covers both entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs in order to understand how they differ in individual characteristics, family background, social networks, values and beliefs, and perceptions of the institutional environment. The data further allow us to separate Chinese entrepreneurs into two groups, by necessity and by opportunity, and to

Entrepreneurs Operating in the Informal Economy: Necessity or Opportunity Driven?

Opportunity or Necessity Entrepreneurship? A Study Based on the National System of Entrepreneurship

Broaden the Pathway to Inclusive Entrepreneurship: A Transaction Cost Proposition

Theoretical Deduction on Influence Factors of Opportunity Recognition in Social Entrepreneurship

ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL DRIVERS OF NECESSITY AND OPPORTUNITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEPENDING ON THE BUSINESS CYCLE PHASE

How Psychological Perceptions and Family Dynamics Shape Necessity- and Opportunity-Based Female Entrepreneurship: the Role of Gender Equality

Opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship: do linguistic structures matter?

Informal sector entrepreneurship, individual entrepreneurial orientation and the emergence of entrepreneurial leadership

The Nature Of Opportunity Recognition In The Entrepreneurship Of Smes

Entrepreneurial Motivations in Start-up and Survival of Micro- and Small Enterprises in the Rural Non-Farm Economy

I Can't Get No Satisfaction - Necessity Entrepreneurship and Procedural Utility

Performance differentials of necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs: through the lens of motivation to learn and female entrepreneurial competencies

Entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Does the motivation to start-up a firm matter?

Entrepreneurial Women and Men: Two Different Species?

Entrepreneurial motivation

Community and Autonomy: Motivations for Entrepreneurship among Arizona Community College Students

Untangling the Effects of Entrepreneurial Opportunity on the Performance of Peasant Entrepreneurship: the Moderating Roles of Entrepreneurial Effort and Regional Poverty Level

Who Are China's Entrepreneurs?

A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory

Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?