Abstract:Purpose This paper seeks to explore one particular aspect of recent PA research: the apparently widening gap between top academic research and practitioner concerns. This topic was commissioned by the Editor of IJPSM . Evidence of this sliding away from the “real world” is presented. The reasons for it are discussed including Q1 increased measurement, competition and professionalization within academia. Whilst these trends bring significant benefits, a case can nevertheless be made for re-balancing PA research. The purpose of this paper Q2 is to sketch some ways of approaching these trends. Design/methodology/approach This paper was commissioned by the editor. The author has chosen to examine the often-cited gap between academic research and current practitioner concerns. The author has done this using as the author’s main evidence base all the main articles published by the highest impact journals over the years 2015 and 2016. Findings Over the past 30 years more and more of the PA research published in the highest impact journals has become further and further removed from the immediate concerns of practicing administrators and managers. At the same time publication in these journals has become more salient for academic careers. Research limitations/implications Whilst the identified trends bring significant benefits (in terms of increasing professionalization and methodological sophistication) they also carry negative consequences for the historically important dialogue between academics and practitioners. A case can be made for attempting to re-balance PA research. Some ways of approaching this are sketched. Practical implications The academic practitioner dialogue, which, historically, has been vital for academic PA, is currently under some stress. Professionalization and competition within the academic world seem to have widened the gap between the top journals and the “real world.” A case is made that the PA academic community needs to find ways of giving this issue more systematic discussion. Originality/value If the argument is largely correct, then current trends threaten the future of academic PA research. This paper is not the first to identify this threat, but it is one of the first to give it extended consideration and systematically to consider possible causes and remedies.

Reflections on AJPA and Other Public Administration Journals

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

Journal of Public Policy & Marketing in Our Turbulent Times: Foundations Laid and Challenges Ahead

Navigating Forward: Sustaining and Enhancing JAPA's Legacy of Impact

Introduction to the symposium on international and comparative public administration education

Reflections on the Journal of Applied Psychology in times of change.

Inaugural editorial.

Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?

Celebrating 15 years of the JAOC: a critical overview and reflections

Publishing while editor: Transparency and behaviour in public administration journals

Reflections on a Legacy: Thoughts from Scholars about Agenda-Setting Past and Future

Editorial Policy As Conversation Aid

Growth and Gratitude: A Note From Our Outgoing Editors

Inaugural editorial for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance .

The Scope and Trends of Public Administration Publications from Selected Journals Between the Year 2000 and 2019

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

Digital Journalism: The Journal and the Path that Brought us Here

A sincere thank you to all our contributors as JA&WMA continues to improve its impact

"I Get By With A Little Help From My Friends ... ": An Editor'S Retrospective

A Tale of Two Journals: Women’s Representation in Public Administration Scholarship

Public Administration for Development: Trends and the Way Forward