Rate of successful shoulder reduction on first confirmatory imaging in the emergency department

Jeffrey R. Stowell,Levi Filler,Carl Mitchell,Ashkon Mahmoudi,Thomas Whiting,Carl Pastore,Matthew Kunz,Murtaza Akhter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.01.002
IF: 1.473
2024-01-24
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Background The management of acute shoulder dislocation in the emergency department (ED) is common. Objectives This study describes the rate, risk factors, and length of stay (LOS) associated with shoulder dislocation reduction failure in the ED. Methods The study is a retrospective case control study of patients ≥18 years presenting to the ED with acute shoulder dislocation and underwent attempted reduction. Patients with successful reduction on post-reduction first confirmatory imaging are compared to those requiring multiple rounds of attempts. Results Of 398 ED encounters where a shoulder reduction attempt was performed in the ED, 18.8% (75/398; 95% CI 15.2-22.9%) required multiple reductions attempts. Patients with successful reduction on first confirmatory imaging were more commonly male (80.2% [95% CI 75.6-84.3%] vs 68.0% [56.8-77.8%], p= 0.0220), discharged home from the ED (95.4% [95% CI 92.6-97.3%] vs 84.0% [95% CI 74.4-91.0%], p= 0.0004), reduced using a traction/countertraction technique (42.1% [95% CI 36.8-47.6%] vs 29.3% [95% CI 19.9-40.4%], p= 0.0415), and less likely to have a pre-reduction fracture (26.0% [95% CI 21.4-31.0%] vs 45.3% [95% CI 34.4-56.7%], p=.0010). The average LOS for those with successful reduction on on first confirmatory imaging was 2 hours and 8 minutes shorter than those with more than one attempt (p < 0.001). Conclusion The rate of failed first pass reduction success is higher than previously reported. Further, the ED LOS is significantly longer in patients requiring multiple rounds of attempts. Knowledge of the failure rate and risk factors may raise physician awareness and guide future studies evaluating approaches for verification of reduction success.
emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?