The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on the psychological and physical outcomes among cancer patients: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Chunxiao Zhao,Lizu Lai,Lin Zhang,Zhihui Cai,Zhihong Ren,Congrong Shi,Wenjun Luo,Yifei Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110304
IF: 4.62
2021-01-01
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>The current study used meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to estimate the effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on the psychological and physical distress of cancer patients, and to identify potential moderators in this body of research.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A search of multiple databases in February 2020 identified 25 independent trials (17 randomized controlled trials, 8 non-randomized controlled trials; 2256 participants) on the effects of ACT among cancer patients. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to determine whether the available evidence is sufficient to draw strong conclusions.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>ACT significantly reduced cancer patients' psychological distress (<em>g</em> = 0.88), and improved psychological flexibility (<em>g</em> = 0.58), quality of life (<em>g</em> = 1.19), and sense of hope (<em>g</em> = 2.17). TSA showed that there was sufficient evidence to obtain stable estimates of the effect of ACT on psychological distress and quality of life. Effect sizes for psychological distress were larger in studies conducted in eastern countries, in older samples, and when therapy was of longer duration.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy can effectively improve the mental health of cancer patients, and can be applied to clinical practice as an effective psychological intervention. Researchers are encouraged to take into account stage and trajectory of cancer in future studies.</p>
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impact of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on the psychological and physical outcomes of cancer patients and to identify potential moderating factors in this research area. Specifically, the authors use meta - analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to estimate the effect of ACT in alleviating the psychological and physical distress of cancer patients and to explore the factors that may influence these effects. ### Main research objectives: 1. **Evaluate the effect of ACT**: Evaluate the impact of ACT on the psychological distress (such as depression, anxiety) and quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients through meta - analysis. 2. **Identify moderating factors**: Explore whether factors such as participant characteristics (such as age, country, cancer stage), intervention characteristics (such as intervention form, duration), and research design (such as randomized controlled trials vs. non - randomized controlled trials, control group type, research quality) will affect the effect of ACT. ### Research methods: - **Literature search**: Search for relevant literature from multiple databases, and finally include 25 independent trials (17 randomized controlled trials, 8 non - randomized controlled trials) with a total of 2,256 participants. - **Data extraction**: Extract the basic information, participant characteristics, ACT characteristics, and outcome variables of each study. - **Meta - analysis**: Use Comprehensive Meta - Analysis software to conduct meta - analysis and calculate the standardized mean difference (Hedges' g) as an effect size indicator. - **Trial sequential analysis**: Use the TSA method to evaluate whether the existing evidence is sufficient to support the effect of ACT and calculate the required information size (RIS). ### Main findings: - **Psychological distress**: ACT significantly reduced the psychological distress of cancer patients (g = 0.88), and the effect was more pronounced in eastern countries, in older samples, and in studies with a longer treatment time. - **Psychological flexibility**: ACT significantly increased the psychological flexibility of cancer patients (g = 0.58). - **Quality of life**: ACT significantly improved the quality of life of cancer patients (g = 1.19). - **Sense of hope**: ACT significantly enhanced the patients' sense of hope (g = 2.17). - **Physical distress**: The improvement effect of ACT on physical distress was not significant (g = - 0.18). ### Conclusions: - **Effectiveness**: ACT can effectively improve the mental health of cancer patients and can be used as an effective psychological intervention method in clinical practice. - **Suggestions for future research**: Researchers should consider different stages of cancer and disease course trajectories to further optimize the effect of ACT. Through these analyses, this study provides strong evidence support for the application of ACT in cancer patients and points out the direction for future research.