Abstract:Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis.Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis.Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. To investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. 49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Biopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. For pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biopsy using a three‐prong asymmetry tip needle for pancreatic tumors and peridigestive tract lesions: Retrospective single‐center study

Cutting edge of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions

Optimal Sampling Technique for EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using a 25-Gauge ProCore Needle: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Superiority Study

Clinical study of ultrasonography guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in pancreatic lesions

High diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of the new 20G procore needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition: Results of a large multicentre retrospective study

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Different Needle Types for Solid Pancreatic Masses: a Prospective and Randomized Comparative Trial in Two Centers

How to Perform Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions?

Safety and value of percutaneous core needle biopsies with biopsy-gun guided by ultrasound in pancreatic solid masses

Guiding and controlling percutaneous pancreas biopsies with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: target lesions are not localized on B-mode ultrasound.

Guidance and Control of Percutaneous Biopsy in Pancreatic Lesions with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions

Optimal Number of Needle Passes During EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions with 22G ProCore Needles and Different Suction Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Biopsy in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Space Occupying Lesions

Transesophageal ultrasound-guided bronchoscopic Acquire TBNB versus Vizishot2 TBNA needles for neoplastic lesions: A retrospective study

Endoscopic Ultrasound Can Differentiate High-Grade Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, and Benign Stenosis

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses

Evaluation of Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Cancer for Genetic Yield and Quality

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy as a tool for studying the intra-tumoral microbiome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study

A novel endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy procedure improves diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.