Profilometry‐Based Indentation Plastometry at High Temperature
Hannes Tammpere,Phil McKeown,James Miller,Chizhou Fang,Emily Curtis,Marcus Gaiser‐Porter,Max Burley,James Campbell,Maria Artiles,Yuanbo Tang,Satesh Utada,Roger Reed,Trevor Clyne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202301073
IF: 3.6
2024-08-31
Advanced Engineering Materials
Abstract:This is a first report on application of profilometry‐based indentation plastometry at high temperature. The hot stage, which is used with a standard benchtop plastometer, is described in detail, together with the procedures involved in its use. Stress–strain curves are obtained for five materials, over a range of temperature, and compared with corresponding curves from conventional tensile testing. This is a first report on profilometry‐based indentation plastometry (PIP) at high temperature (HT), covering both thermal characterization and issues for obtaining stress–strain curves. The heating system has a relatively low thermal inertia, reaching 800 °C within about 10 min, while both indentation (≈20 s) and cooling (≈20 min) are also quick. This capability is useful in terms of limiting exposure of the sample to prolonged periods at HT, and hence avoiding the formation of thick oxide layers (which can affect indent profiles and hence inferred stress–strain curves). There is good general consistency between stress–strain curves obtained via HT‐PIP and those from tensile testing. However, the possibility of creep (time‐dependent deformation) affecting the outcomes (of both types of test), particularly at higher temperatures, should be borne in mind. Creep has a characteristic effect on tensile curves, which can often be confirmed and investigated by changing the imposed strain rate. It can also be revealed by carrying out the HT‐PIP testing with different penetration velocities or by monitoring the shape of the load–displacement plot.
materials science, multidisciplinary